Trump’s imagination, caring for customers, and whether Trump is really a woman

26 July 2025

While the bigwigs are trashing societies and economies worldwide, here’s some light relief in a selection of irresistible and utterly forgettable facts.

Have you noticed that Trump’s combover has been gradually re-dyed from blonde to grey?  Curiously, the much-published photograph of him with Jeffrey Epstein (which incidentally proves to his complete satisfaction that he was never close to Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell so his name cannot possibly appear in the Epstein files that he’s desperately trying to stop being published) … where was I? … oh yes, the photo shows his hair was originally brown.

During his first presidency, he made 30,573 false or misleading claims during his first four years as president. The Washington Post counted them.

I wonder when Donald Trump will realise his country was named after a filthy foreigner and needs to be renamed.  Trumpton would work and Trump could change his name to Captain Flack, the head honcho in Trumpton fire station (younger readers overseas may need to google this).

I generally try not to criticise people for physical features that are not of their choice, like height or physical abnormalities, but I do have great difficulty watching Trump when he purses his mouth into a shape that exactly matches a textbook anus.

A friend of mine has an EE phone.  When it broke recently, they bought a new phone that had to be verified by a code which, in a stroke of genius, EE sent to the old phone with the damaged SIM card.

This is the sort of unintelligent disregard for customers you expect from Ryanair.  I flew with Ryanair once, some 30 years ago, in the days before they sold flights for a token amount and then gave you the choice of paying extra to sit next to your violent, autistic child or to save money by letting a stranger sit next to them while you catch up on your sleep.

Anyway, our outbound flight was OK apart from landing us at an airport some 15km from Rome and bussing us into the centre.  When we left, they bussed us back to the airport before telling us all their UK flights that day had been cancelled but they could book us on a flight 4 days later, which left a lot of irate passengers trying to find other ways home.  All other direct flights were full, as were trains, so we had to buy an extra night in the hotel and spend a fortune on scheduled flights back the next day, via Prague.

I naturally wrote to the CEO, Michael O’Leary, about this and asked if could think of any reason why anybody should fly Ryanair.  He ultimately answered “reliability and price” so I pointed out he obviously hadn’t read my original letter and told him not to bother to reply.

Ryanair’s attitude to their customers is clear on their website:  they’ll fly you to Copenhagen, the capital of Denmark, but you’ll actually land in Malmö in Sweden.  Likewise, they’ll take you to Florence but you’ll land in Pisa.  O’Leary was once famously quoted as saying he’d wipe somebody’s bottom for a fiver, which perfectly sums up his character.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, aka Tommy Robinson to avoid frightening the peasants, is out of prison and in the news again, at least in Epping.  Lucy Brown, once part of his inner circle that includes the son of one of the Krays, a Canadian far-right publisher and a criminal convicted of threatening to slash the throat of a shopkeeper during a robbery, has described him as impulsive.

She has said “He’ll just rush in, straight away, whatever feels right at the time. He just does not think. Which is why he falls in [to] prison all the time, because he’s always saying stuff that he shouldn’t.”

More management disdain for the people who pay them was seen at the Nationwide Building Society’s AGM last week when an increase in the CEO’s pay of 43% was ‘approved’ (though voters didn’t actually have the power to stop it) and Debbie Crosbie will snaffle £7m of the assets of a mutual society that belongs to its members (who described the increase as “an obscenity” and “hypocritical”).

Another needy CEO is Trump himself, whose ratings are falling daily.  Increasingly, Americans are leaving their home country because they can see Trump destroying it, and many of them are relocating to the Cotswolds (formerly known as the Couttswolds because so many rich Brits live there).  One of the latest immigrants (who, according to my taxi driver last week, are the sole cause of all Britain’s problems) is the American comedian and former chatshow host Ellen DeGeneres and her wife, the actor Portia de Rossi.

This seems diametrically opposed to right wing claims that Britain’s millionaires are emigrating in droves to pay even less tax elsewhere, but who lets contradictory facts stand in the way of a good slogan.

A possible side effect of one of Trump’s ill-considered decisions is that he should consider himself to be female.  One of his first acts as president was to sign an order that gender is “immutably” defined at the moment of conception, saying “‘Female’ means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell …’Male’ means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.”  Which reveals his total ignorance of human biology.

In fact, for the first 6-7 weeks after conception, it isn’t possible to determine the gender of a foetus because a Y chromosome doesn’t start to develop testes until then.  However, most scientists now accept that sex is not immutably anything and gender is much more complex than just being male or female.

Trump’s unrecorded response to this criticism was “Bollocks to that, or not, as the case may be”.

Still, it does pave the way for an antique joke:  “How do you tell the sex of a chromosome?” / “Take its genes down.”

Lucky Wilbury, rapists, UK prisons, genocide, Trump’s latest gaffe, Brexit and dodgy lawyers

24 May 2025

Today’s biggest news is, of course, that Lucky Wilbury (aka Bob Dylan) has made it to his 84th birthday.  Who said mind-altering drugs were bad for you?  They helped him become the greatest lyricist in the last 100 years …

Other goodish news this week (at least for us sadists) came when Shabana Mahmood, the Lord Chancellor, was reported to be considering chemical castration for the most serious sex offenders.  I know of two young women who were violently raped and suffered permanent damage and wonder if this goes far enough;  I’ve heard enough about these two people to be tempted to support the use of a pair of blunt bolt-cutters.

They’re also considering releasing and tagging killers and rapists half-way through their sentences.  Surely these are exactly the wrong people to release.  Shouldn’t they be releasing (and tagging?) non-violent offenders to release overcrowding in prisons and perhaps never giving first offenders custodial sentences if their crimes didn’t involve violence against people?

Talking of criminals inevitably makes me think of Benjamin Netanyahu who is committing war crimes in the name of Zionism and then accusing his critics of being anti-Semitic.  I don’t know enough about him to know if he actually is that stupid or if he’s intentionally manipulating the truth because he wants people to think he’s slaughtering Palestinians in the name of a religion rather than for political reasons.

Gary Lineker has been fired by the BBC after re-posting a pro-Palestinian video criticising Zionism on social media .  Unfortunately, it included a picture of a rat which was, apparently, used by the Nazis to associate Jews with vermin.  Lineker later apologised and said he would “never knowingly share anything antisemitic” and he’d deleted the post “as soon as I became aware of the issue”.

Still, it’ll save the BBC a fortune because they grossly overpaid him.

Even the UK is taking a stand and the Foreign Secretary David Lammy has suspended negotiations over a free-trade deal saying calls from some of Israel’s cabinet ministers to “purify Gaza” by expelling Palestinians were abhorrent, and he condemned their refusal to allow thousands of aid deliveries to reach starving Palestinians.

Israeli troops fired what they called “warning shots” at an international group of diplomats from 31 countries who had been invited by the Palestinian Authority to see what was happening in Gaza.  Israel’s explanation was that the group had deviated from the route they’d tried to impose on the delegation in a country which they’d invaded where they have no legal rights to impose a tax on bread.

The leader of the Israeli opposition has said Israel “kills babies as a hobby” and even Ehud Olmert, a former prime minister of Israel, has said what Israel “is doing now in Gaza is very close to a war crime”.  “Very close”? What haven’t they told him?

Netanyahu’s apparent lack of intelligent reasoning seems rather like Donald Trump’s more stupid outbursts which last week included accusing South Africa’s president Cyril Ramaphosa of “white genocide” which Trump ‘proved’ to his complete satisfaction with pictures taken in the Democratic Republic of Congo.  Ramaphosa himself remained dignified and stood up to Trump by drawing attention to his apparent attachment to far-right conspiracy theories.

Trump could, I suppose, have responded by saying that one of his latest ploys has been to suggest that women with more than five children should be awarded a National Medal of Motherhood in attempt to increase the population.  Doesn’t this sound like something Mao Zedung would have done if he hadn’t been encouraging people to kill flies though I don’t think even Trump would believe Mao was on the far-right so his at least his delusions are balanced.

Over here, my Conservative friend is trying to convince me that, because Brits voted for Brexit, it’s undemocratic for Keir Starmer to be negotiating with the EU to remove some of its daftest consequences.  However, he refuses to accept that an even greater majority of Brits elected Starmer’s party, which empowers the prime minister to reduce some of the inconveniences such as queuing with other ‘aliens’ to enter an EU country, and allowing EU citizens to be given visas and permits to work in the UK, a right that already exists for young Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders and South Koreans.

In a different arena, another friend recently discovered the unfairness and misleading claims of ‘no-win, no-fee’ lawyers.  They had a perfectly good case against their landlords (a housing association, also registered as a charity, with assets of almost £1bn!) who took 5 years to act on reports of damaged window frames.

Unfortunately, one of these firms managed to convince them they could get compensation from the landlords so they drew up a case which went to Court on the day before the Easter weekend when people wanted to rush things and get home early.  I accompanied her as a McKenzie friend and discovered that the solicitors, who are based in Liverpool, had instructed a barrister from Cardiff (well, Cardiff, Exeter, they’re all south of Crewe aren’t they) to represent her in court.

I know some KCs and this one didn’t impress me nearly as much as he impressed himself. He didn’t discuss either the case or what sort of compensation they would accept with my friend, instead talking about his personal life and showing us pictures of his house.  He also ignored a specific instruction that costs were to be in addition to compensation (since he didn’t know what the costs would be) but, after some to-ing and fro-ing with the other side, he announced that he’d agreed a settlement out of court, without saying what it was.

This turned out to be a lump sum which included costs totalling more than 80% of the total so the actual compensation was derisory and, so far, the lawyers have ignored the Court’s instruction that payment should be made within 21 days and my friend has so far received nothing.

I’m now trying to help my friend put this right but the main lesson I’ve learned is never to use no-win no-fee lawyers because at least some of them don’t know what’s written on their tin.

US electioneering,UK’s leaders, radioactive peaches and oysters,

14 September 2024

Last week saw the first – and only? – debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump and immediate reactions, even from Fox News, were that Harris had won:  a snap poll by CNN showed 63% for Harris and 37% for Trump.  The Democrats no doubt also benefitted from the contrast between this debate and the earlier skirmish between Trump and Joe Biden, which Biden fluffed so badly.

Another move in Harris’s favour came from Taylor Swift whose AI-generated image had been broadcast by Trump and appeared to show that she and her fans were Trump supporters, and an earlier post that had called her a “childless cat lady”.  Having stayed away from the tussle so far, this brought her into the open and she has now endorsed Harris for president, saying “she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos”. 

She included a picture of herself with one of her cats and signed off as “Childless cat lady”.

Harris succeeded by being well-prepared and leading Trump into his usual, incomprehensible rants about unrelated topics.

It’s a bit like how to reply when somebody is aggressive and swears at you or insults you:  leave a slight pause and ask what they said.  They then repeat it and you say “I thought that’s what you said” and you stop, turn away and walk off, ignoring any attempts they make to amplify the original comment.

One of the ads that pop up on my computer claimed that there are 10 different measures of intelligence.  I naturally didn’t click on it but I did have a vision of Trump getting one answer right in each of the 10 tests and then claiming he scored 10 out of 10, or 100% …

Me, I’d vote for Harris because she’s beautiful, looks intelligent and has an irresistible smile.  My Conservative friend would vote for Trump because he’s not Biden or his protegé.  Aren’t they both great reasons for helping elect a new Commander-in-Chief!

Out in the field, the Republican candidate for the Senate in Montana, a state that could decide which party controls the Senate, is busy rewriting his CV.  Records written at the time show he left the military because of injury, disillusionment over military personnel policies and refusing the offer of a desk job but, on the campaign trail, he’s now claiming to have been “discharged” because of wounds suffered while he was on duty.

Over here, OfCom, which fined Royal Mail £5.6m last year because it failed to deliver 20% of its first class post on time, is now saying they might let Royal Mail off delivering second class mail on Saturdays, reducing the contractual commitments they demanded of Royal Mail when the service was privatised.  This seems stupid since postal workers will still have to do their rounds on Saturdays to deliver first class mail so why not take second class letters as well?

The aim is presumably to reduce staff costs while increasing profits for the owners while, quite coincidentally, its parent company is currently considering an offer (which is subject to a national security review) from the Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky.

I no longer understand quite how the Post Office, Royal Mail and Parcelforce are now related.  I stamped an envelope recently and took it into the local post office to add the extra costs of ‘Signed for Delivery’.  We can’t do that, I was told, because the stamp is Royal Mail and getting mail signed for is the Post Office.  Or possibly vice versa

The decision to remove the winter heating payment from people who don’t receive pension credits has been widely criticised and it does appear that it might not have been properly thought through.  One commentator has pointed out that the £1.3bn saved will barely cover 8 weeks’ spending on “the useless HS2 – spending that is set to continue for the next five years”.

They go on to say that Keir Starmer must stop rubbishing the Tories and show how Labour can save “prisons, hospitals, schools and care homes” (something the Tories so disastrously failed to do in 14 years).

On the other side, there seems no great enthusiasm within the parliamentary party for any of the Tories who want to take over from Rishi Sunak (and the rest of us couldn’t give a hoot).

In Japan, they are still facing problems over the removal of 880 tons of extremely dangerous radioactive material that is still in Fukushima after the 2011 earthquake destroyed three of the nuclear plant’s six reactors.  Radiation levels in the debris are still so high that the Tokyo Electric Power Company has had to develop specialised robots to extract a tiny sample for testing.

They’re also promoting food grown in the Fukushima area and Harrods now sells Fukushima peaches (£80 for a box of 3, but that’s Harrods for you).  The peaches are apparently known for their juicy, sweet taste – and possibly because they glow in dark kitchens when night starvation takes you in there for a fruity snack.

Now here’s a confession:  I’ve never liked oysters.  Apart from a feeling of distaste at eating something that’s still alive, twitches when you dribble lemon juice on it and has the consistency of fresh snot, all you can taste is salt (and lemon juice). 

Anyway, conservationists are now employing oysters’ skills at filtering water (an adult oyster can filter 200 litres of water a day) to create oyster reefs which will attract other species to the filtered water and help rebalance the marine ecology.  Thames Water will probably start selling packs of three oysters for £80 because they won’t just taste of oyster but will have the added gustatory subtleties extracted from untreated sewage and retained in their bodies.

The next, obvious step is to do away with all those expensive sewage treatment plants and create oyster beds in the outflow systems.

I’m now going to find a quiet place and lie down for a bit.

Small steps forward in the UK and elsewhere, and a Lesser Mutterings recommended supplier

7 September 2024

There are small signs that the UK is beginning to move on from the depredations of recent years.

David Cameron, first of the five prime ministers under the last Conservative government, committed himself to “a bonfire of red tape”.  The principle was of course widely applauded as necessary to “boost the economy” but he tragically failed to tighten regulations that were inadequate or ambiguous, such as fire regulations that are designed to ensure the safety of buildings.

In 2013, following the death of six people in a fire in the cladding of Lakanal House, a London council block, the coroner recommended that fire safety regulations should be tightened up.

Eric Pickles, housing secretary at the time, was keener on cutting back regulations and is reported to have “ignored, delayed or disregarded” matters regarding fire safety and risk to life.  In his recent examination under oath, Pickles still claimed, in the face of hard evidence to the contrary given by his officers and contemporaneous documents, that cutting regulations did not include building regulations.

Then on 14 June 2017, four years later, 72 people (of whom 15 were disabled) were killed in the catastrophic fire at Grenfell Tower, another London council block.

The 1,700-page report of the official inquiry into the latter disaster, which was published last week, has made it clear that almost everyone colluded in concealing the risks and must bear the blame.

The report found that three firms, Arconic, Kingspan and Celotex, “engaged in deliberate and sustained strategies to … mislead the market”;  the architects, Studio E, did not act as a “reasonably competent architect” and “bears a very significant degree of responsibility for the disaster”;  the builders Rydon and Harley Facades, and the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea’s building control department also share responsibility for the fire and the deaths it caused.

The inquiry also says the government was “well aware” of the risks posed by highly flammable cladding “but failed to act on what it knew” and, even worse, that some £250m more has been since been given to firms involved in the incompetent refurbishment of Grenfell Tower

The good news is that this report is likely to get so much publicity that firms are likely to be excluded from future government contracts and, with luck, key individuals will face corporate manslaughter charges.  The bad news is that this is likely to take years and they don’t sound like the sort of people who will die of shame..

More good news is that the new government has scrapped the one-word judgment on state schools after Ofsted ‘inspections’.  Why did it take so long after the suicide of head teacher Ruth Perry after her school was downgraded from ‘outstanding’ to ‘inadequate’ to get politicians to make the change to a system that was obviously fundamentally flawed.

The new government has also cancelled the VIP helicopter contract on which Rishi Sunak spent £40m so he could get from London to places like Southampton and Essex.  Not much quicker than the train but so, so much more comfortable my dear.  (Even E2R sometimes used a public train from Kings Cross to get to Kings Lynn on her way to Sandringham.)  The helicopter contract, which Sunak extended in December last year, expires this December and had already been put out to tender by the Conservatives.

Other good news is that, after a 2-month review, the Foreign Office believes there is a “clear risk” that exporting arms to Israel may allow them to commit serious breaches of international law, and the UK is to suspend some arms export licences to Israel. 

According to the Financial Times, our contribution only comprises 1% of Israel’s arms imports (or 0.02% according to GBNews, which has estimated that 98% of arms exports will still be allowed).  Still, we have to start somewhere and any reduction is to be welcomed.

Even better is the news that America is bringing criminal charges against at least six of Hamas’ top leaders for the 7 October attack on Israel which has since led to more than 40,000 deaths.  And no, I’m not one of those who believe that all Gazans are Hamas terrorists even though they elected a Hamas-led government.  Nor do I believe that Brits were all Conservative until very recently and are now all Labour even though they elected both the governments we’ve had this year.

This then made me wonder what would happen in America if Donald Trump was elected president before the various criminal charges he’s facing are resolved.  Can a president pardon himself before a case has been judged?  If they can, and Trump does, surely that’s an implicit admission of guilt.

Do presidents actually have the power to pardon themselves anyway?  Surely the writers of the Constitution couldn’t have intended that, after being elected in November, a president-elect could go on the rampage with a weapon and then pardon themselves after they take office in January.  Or didn’t it cross their minds that Americans might be stupid enough to elect somebody like Trump?

Labour is planning to remove the remaining 92 of the nepo babies from the House of Lords.  Whether that will significantly reduce the numbers actually attending and voting remains to be seen.

Although I conceal it well*, I’m a great believer in complaining about bad service in the hope it will encourage firms to improve their service for others so I think it’s only fair to acknowledge good service when I come across it. 

I recently decided to replace a couple of worn-out shirts with one offered by Savile Row Company and discounted to my price limit, but the discount code didn’t work so I emailed them asking why.  (Have you noticed how few companies now publicise their email addresses, presumably because they provide lousy services and then get fed up with people emailing them to complain?)

Anyway, they answered by return saying that code had expired but they had another which gave a better discount and the shirt arrived 2 days later, even more cheaplier than I’d expected.  Well done Savile Row Company!

*          Comparatively well?

The biggest anti-Semite, Trump the Felon, Labour dithering, bank’s irresponsibility

1 June 2024

The most effective anti-Semite is now proving to be Benjamin Netanyahu.  This week, he excelled himself by killing about 50 people living in tents by bombing the Rafah refugee camp.  He argued that Hamas terrorists could have been hiding there and what are a few innocent lives worth compared with the death of a terrorist.  He didn’t put it in quite those words but the man is obviously bonkers.

His actions have even caused America, until now one of the biggest supporters of the state of Israel, to pull back and limit their support, particularly since reports have claimed the bombs used in the attack were made in America.

Even those of us who were appalled and horrified by Hamas’s unheralded and murderous attack on Israel in October have been even more horrified by Israel’s wholly disproportionate response that has been extended into a genocidal attack on everybody living in Gaza.  People who have unwisely compared this with the Nazis’ holocaust are missing the point:  no desire for racial purity is being claimed, just Netanyahu’s desire to delay his ending up in a criminal court.

We also heard this week that Israel has been using its intelligence agencies to “surveil (sic – how I hate that word, backformed from surveillance), hack, pressure, smear and allegedly threaten senior staff” of the International Criminal Court by intercepting phone calls, messages, emails and documents, for at least ten years, so Netanyahu had advance warning of what they were thinking.

Isarel also made it clear that “we know where you live”, sending pictures of their families to people who didn’t seem to believe the sun rises in Israel and were seeking an arrest warrant for Netanyahu himself.

It is no doubt coincidental that the governments of Ireland, Norway and Spain have decided to recognise the state of Palestine.

How long will it be before Netanyahu joins Donald Trump in having to offer a defence to a court?  Perhaps he’ll do the decent thing and have heart failure first.

Trump himself has been found guilty of all 34 of the offences he was charged with after only 12 hours of deliberation by the jury.  Even though his crimes were committed to hide things from voters deciding whether to elect him in 2016, he’s unlikely to be given a custodial sentence because telling lies in politics and falsifying business records are ‘white collar’ crimes, but he could have to report regularly to New York’s probation department.  If he is – God forbid – re-elected as president, you can imagine it can’t you:  “Sorry Benjie, I can’t meet you next Tuesday, I’ve got to report to my probation officer”.

What amazes me is that his poll ratings have hardly reacted to his exposure as a liar and a thief and devout Republications everywhere are claiming it’s a stitch-up.  I wonder how many of them have read all the documents presented to the court and listened to all the arguments before making this judgement.

Worryingly, his conviction doesn’t prevent his becoming president again.

Which reminds me that the largest and most complete Stegosaurus fossil ever found is coming up for auction at Sothebys in the summer with an estimate of $4m-$6m.  I haven’t seen any reference to the costs of posts and packing but perhaps it’s ‘buyer collects’.

Which reminds me Jeremy Hunt has promised that current tax thresholds will stay the same for six years, thereby forcing millions more to pay more tax, but he’s said wouldn’t increase taxes.  Anybody else spot the self-contradiction?

The Labour party has been getting its knickers in a twist by refusing to let Diane Abbott, who said something stupid and apologised, stand as a Labour candidate but, luckily, commonsense has prevailed and they’ve changed their minds.

Whether Angela Rayner’s intervention, saying she couldn’t see any reason why Abbott shouldn’t stand for Labour, made any difference, we’ll never know, but it stopped Keir Starmer’s dithering.

Rayner had previously been accused by Tories of having dodged tax on the sale of her former council house but she was given absolute clearance this week by the police, the local council and HMRC.  HMRC of course says it never comments on an individual’s tax matters but, somehow, what a surprise, its conclusions were made public and they stated categorically that she had done nothing wrong.

And a final apolitical thought:  have you ever realised how banks have become less and less interested in securing the money they hold on trust for their customers?  These ‘touch and go’ cards mean that anyone with somebody else’s card can use it to spend up to £100 without permission.  Again and again, until their credit limit is reached (or the card’s owner realises and cancels the card).

Well, the banks will no doubt say, it’s just like cash, which anyone else can spend if you lose it.  Except that it isn’t because the chances of dropping several hundreds of pounds in notes in a public place are very much less.

And, if your account is hacked and your money is transferred to an unknown account, will the banks chase it and refund it?  Will they buggery.  You should have had a second level of security, they say.  Why?  Because (they won’t say) their first level of security is grossly insufficient and they don’t have any control systems that pick up things like a first-ever cash transfer to Switzerland, or repeated payments to betting companies that you’ve never made before.

But why should they take care of the money you’ve entrusted to them?  It’d just increase costs.

This has all happened to a friend of mine recently so, if you’re thinking of changing banks, avoid Barclays like the plague.

My two bad weeks, migrants and sewage

27 April 2024

Do you ever have one of those weeks when you think that at least next week can’t be any worse, then it is?

Two weeks ago, I was on my way to the local hospital to give a friend and her 17-day old baby a lift home, crawling through traffic and stopping in queues at traffic lights.  When the lights changed, I drove forward slowly, signalled and turned left into a narrow one-way street where a bicycle was coming the wrong way towards me in the middle of the road, so I stopped, but the car behind me didn’t.  According to my dashcam, I was doing 3mph when I was hit, having braked from 11mph in 2 seconds.  From the extent of the damage caused to both cars, the driver behind was obviously still accelerating.

Nobody was hurt and my first reaction was “buggrit, another 24 hours of unnecessary paperwork”.  This has turned out to be a gross underestimate.

Two days later, the other car shed its brake fluid (three weeks after it had been changed as part of a service and MOT).  Luckily, we had just got home when the dashboard flashed up a message in unfriendly red letters saying “STOP, DRIVE NO MORE, YOU WILL DIE, YOU’VE DRIBBLED ALL YOUR BRAKE FLUID ONTO THE ROAD, YOU HAVE NO BRAKES, WE’RE SORRY FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE THIS MAY CAUSE, THANK YOU FOR HOLDING, YOU ARE NUMBER 117 IN THE QUEUE”.

Followed by writing a report for the insurance company and attaching a map, a sketch plan, details of the cyclist, a witness and the other driver, 7 pictures of the damage, and a video clip from my dashcam.  Did you know that Direct Line’s email address for claims don’t accept movie clips so you have to start again and upload them to a different link?

The paperwork and phone calls from insurers, repairers and the replacement car people, none of whom seem to talk to each other, were followed by a trip to the repairers who took more pictures and said of course they wouldn’t know how much damage had been done until they could see the panels under the damaged bumper.

(Naturally, my policy needs renewing in four weeks so I’m having to confess that yes I’ve had an accident but no I haven’t got the foggiest what it’ll cost.)

This week, the Sainsbury delivery didn’t arrive in the morning when it was supposed to and, two hours later, they emailed to say that all deliveries had been cancelled because their computer system had broken and here’s £20 compensation.  No food, just £20, and no word about why this warning wasn’t sent before the delivery was due. 

Then we went to the hospital for a 6-week check-up on my wife’s eyes – their third attempt at an appointment after they’d cancelled the first two – and got chucked out because they hadn’t read the bit on her file about the need for a hoist to transfer her a gurney / bed.  They then rang later to say the earliest they could do was late May so we had a friendly chat about whether a 13-week gap was OK instead of a 6-week gap (it wasn’t last time).  I asked them to check with the consultant and they finally rang back to say we could come in on Monday and, if we came in 4 hours earlier, they could do two procedures at once.  So I had to ring the dentist to delay the appointment I had booked into that 4 hours.

Next Monday is the day our car is being collected for repair and the replacement car is being delivered.  Guess whether the same person can drive the replacement car here and go back in the (driveable) damaged car.

The whole process is almost as convincing as Rishi Sunak’s law allowing him to send migrants to Rwanda, which he had to bully through parliament this week.  Rwanda is a central African country with lots of sunshine which, despite a history of genocide and human rights abuses, is now united under a democratically-elected leader of immense charm who regularly gets more than 95% of the vote and Sunak’s new law declares it is now absolutely safe for migrants who will probably be accommodated in luxury hotels overlooking Rwanda’s sunlit beaches*.

Sunak has said that, if migrants know they’re going to be shipped from the UK straight out to Rwanda, this will deter them from crossing the Channel.  He doesn’t seem to have thought this through because, if Rwanda really is that safe, migrants will be rushing across the Channel and saying ”Sod UK visas, where’s my boarding card for the next flight to Rwanda”.

Sheer brilliance.  Same as “stopping the boats” or, as the old proverb has it “treating the symptom, not the cause”.  First, many of us don’t care about the boats and think it’s the people in them who are important, and second, if there was an international police effort to remove all the traffickers from circulation, the ‘passengers’ wouldn’t be forced to pay huge sums of money to criminal gangs to risk their lives in leaky boats.

While on a roll, the Conservatives have also forced through a requirement that water companies should prioritise profits over sewage in rivers, lakes and the sea.  This would be OK if they were required to factor in absolutely massive fines they should pay every single time they allowed sewerage to ‘escape’ into our natural waters. They’d owe us money by Thursday week.

Why don’t they just renationalise the lot?  The Tories have already quietly renationalised a large proportion of the railway network, at least one major artery of which now seems to be making more money than when it was privatised despite the same people running it, and Kier Starmer has promised that, if Labour’s elected, they’ll reclaim the rest when their contracts expire.

Hurriedly changing the subject as I rush to the end, have you heard of ‘auto-brewery syndrome’?  Neither had I.  It’s very rare but the bodies of people with it make their own alcohol and risk failing a breath test even if they’re teetotal.

*          As I’m sure you know, Rwanda doesn’t actually have a coast.

Tabloid ethics, late stage capitalism and the Lord’s prayer

15 July 2023

The Sun newspaper hit the news last week with a very dubiously motivated story about a (then) unnamed senior BBC figure paying for “sordid images” of someone who had been 17 at the time.  My immediate reaction was “so what,” based on my belief that, when I was 17, I’d have felt able to make up my own mind about being paid for photographs and, if they produced enough money to feed a drug habit, it would have been better than stealing from my parents.

The presenter has since been named but I see no reason to humiliate them any more here because it seems potty that the two people concerned could have had a sexual relationship legally but sending photographs is illegal.

It’s a bit like the Illegal Migrants bill which is being forced through parliament.  This is a hugely important piece of legislation designed to sacrifice frightened and vulnerable people, victims of modern slavery, pregnant women and children (sorry, “small boats”) on the altar of the gods but the number of MPs on either side who could be bothered to attend the debate was pathetic.

I gather that not even Rishi Sunak could be bothered to take part, but he doesn’t seem to turn up for much for anything nowadays, not even PMQs, though he has finally accepted the recommendations of independent public sector review boards to allow 6% pay increases (but only if they cut budgets elsewhere).  The government can still afford huge, outdated aircraft carriers, refurbishing / rebuilding the Palace of Westminster instead of hiring a bunch of portakabins in Croydon and pouring good money after bad into HS2 (whose umpteenth CEO resigned last week), a railway line that is going from an old engine shed in NW London to … Scotland?  North Wales?  the north of England?  the continent?  … no, Birmingham, to cut 20 minutes off the journey time for any Brummies who might want to go to Willesden.

The MacAlister review of children’s social care on the care system published last year has found things are now worse than ever and that private care providers have been getting even richer by opening new homes in areas where housing is cheap, regardless of where they are actually needed.  So children and young adults may now be ‘housed’ more than 300 miles from their families and friends.

The report concluded that urgent changes were needed to transform a financially unsustainable system whose costs are already spiralling out of control:  some private children’s residential home providers are charging up to £30,000 per week per child and often still failing to meet the needs of those in their care.

But let’s not worry about this because moving them to cheaper areas produces more profits for the private care providers (and, with luck, more tax for the government.)

Perhaps all health and social care provision should be nationalised and the profits used to pay the staff properly and provide professional health- and care-related services. 

A further example of the shocking lack of integrity, professionalism and whatchamacallit of private businesses was demonstrated by Revolution Beauty.  At a shareholders’ meeting on 27 June, 75% of the shareholders voted to chuck out the CEO, the CFO and the chair. 

So far, so good, and out they were chucked;  after all, the shareholders own the company while the directors are the people who run it for them so they had the power to do this.  The shocking bit came when, after the meeting that fired them, an ‘independent’ director, Jeremy Schwartz, co-opted all three of them back onto the board.  Watch this space!

Other examples of corporate misdeeds were uncovered by HMRC who have fined 200 companies, including household names like Argos, Lloyds Pharmacy, Marks & Spencer and WH Smith, a total of £7m, as well as forcing them to pay almost £5m more as compensation to the workers they’d cheated.

Talk about ‘late stage capitalism’ which has totally lost sight of the ideals of ‘pure’ capitalism which accept that businesses need both money and people, with profits shared between the people who put the money in and the people who do the work, accepting that being a manager is less dangerous than digging out coal a mile underground.

Of course it never worked like this but, after a fashion, it survived until Maggie Thatcher, who never had family silver, started selling the government’s assets, not realising that once the proceeds had been spent, there was no longer an income stream to cover shortfalls.  Its ultimate failure came when regional monopolies with locked-in customers were privatised and ‘Thatcherism’ allowed water companies to charge consumers what they like and shovel shit into their swimming waters because their ‘customers’ can’t change supplier. 

After a 7-year €1.4bn clean-up project, the French are planning to open three bathing areas in the Seine in Paris, one of them close to the Eiffel Tower in central Paris.  Tests carried out last year showed waterborne bacteria at a safe level for swimming 90% of the time with the quality only deteriorating after heavy rain.  The water will be tested daily when bathing starts.

Insert your own comparisons with the English water companies here.

There’s also trooble at t’ church.  The archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, has upset some people by suggesting the start of the Lord’s Prayer might be perceived as sexist because it starts “Our father …”  Another clergyman has objected, saying (I paraphrase) “Well, the Bible quotes Jesus as having said ‘Our Father …’”

What worries me slightly (and I’m not a Christian) is that English versions of the Bible have been translated from other languages into which into which it had, over the millenia, been translated from yet other languages.  What’s the big deal?  Why don’t they just say “Our Lord …” or “Dear God …”?  Surely it’s the spirit of the thing that matters, not the actual words?

God has traditionally been portrayed as an older man with a flowing grey beard who looked rather like my great great grandfather but I haven’t the foggiest idea why he’s male (God, not my GGGF).  I’ve always liked to visualise God as a glowing light, like a halo, or aura, that doesn’t need a person underneath.

It was neatly summed up in the 1970s by a graffito that said “God is dead” and, underneath this, somebody had written “No she isn’t”.

Liars, pronoun problems, BRICS, raisins and Cormac McCarthy

17 June 2023

Wasn’t it fascinating last weekend to watch the UK’s best-known liar resign because he believed somebody had lied to him after he had himself been judged to have lied to (“misled” in parliamentary language) the House of Commons.  Followed by his remaining fan stamped her little foot and resigned, saying she was “heartbroken” (!) because she wasn’t given a peerage, except her resignation letter has not yet been received.  It’ll be interesting to see how ‘the people’ vote in the by-elections the resignations caused.

Reactions to Boris Johnson’s petulance were predictable, and occasionally laughable. 

One of the more serious views was that “As a master of public manipulation, Boris Johnson has few equals … The announcement [of his resignation] has familiar characteristics: ‘convicted by a kangaroo court’ [and] ‘undemocratic’ is difficult to square with the ultimate responsibility that the committee places on the House of Commons. The Labour chair is thrown into the mix to give his friends in the popular press a hook onto which to hang their anti-Labour propaganda … He can continue to cause damage to the party as he has done so conspicuously in recent years, because he retains a following in the country.” 

This could have been seen as sour grapes from one of the tofu-eating wokerati had it not been penned by Lord (Michael) Heseltine, deputy prime minister in John Major’s Conservative government from 1995 to 1997, who is clearly keen to reunite the Conservative party.

On the lighter side, the Sunday Times quoted one of his close friends who said “He is making loads of money.  He needs money. He likes money.  I think he’ll use the money to try to buy back all the people he lost in his life.” 

With friends like that, who needs enemies?

Or, as Bob Dylan wrote “All the money you made will never buy back your soul.”

A different view was taken by Gillian Keegan, the Education Secretary, who has said – apparently with a straight face – that people need to live within their means as the Government works to bring down inflation;  and that public sector pay rises risk increasing inflation and making everyone poorer.  She then produced a classic example of ‘the pronoun problem’ and said “We too must show restraint when it is needed”.

Where does this “we” come from?  Is that “we who struggle through on six-figure pay packets” or we whose existence she denies, like a friend of ours who is a young (= no pension) single-mother with a challenging 5-year old who found it hard enough to survive on child support and universal credit even before she got long covid and prices went through the roof and she can’t get a job that fits round school hours and holidays?

Not quite as unrepresented is the former American president Donald Trump who apparently had difficulties finding lawyers to represent him after several had declined to defend him at his latest court appearance.  After all, who’d use a law firm that had unsuccessfully attempted to defend prisoner 41283649 Trump Donald.  “Well, we only did it for the money” doesn’t impress.  “We did it so we could all admire his new haircut” would be better.

That evening, Fox News showed a live broadcast of Trump’s speech and, towards the end, split the screen to show side-by-side pictures of Joe Biden and Trump under which one of Trump’s loony fans in Fox had written the chyron “Wannabe dictator speaks at the White House after having his political rival arrested.”  The text remained up until the following programme and Fox News said they had “addressed” the situation – possibly with a bottle of champagne?  Fox rivals CNN and MSNBC had declined the opportunity to broadcast Trump’s rant.

South Africa is supposed to host this year’s BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) summit to discuss closer partnership between the five countries.  The problem is that R’s president is one Vladimir Putin who is wanted by an international court on charges of war crimes and, as a party to the Rome statute on which the international criminal court is based, South Africa would be required to arrest Putin on his arrival and send him to the Hague for trial.  The summit may therefore be relocated to China or India, who don’t believe suspected war criminals should be arrested.

By the way, a recent study published in the journal Current Biology claimed that worms also get the munchies when stoned.  They soaked worms in a cannabinoid solution and the worms starting eating more.  Actually, I don’t get the munchies but I do get terribly thirsty.

We ordered a food delivery this week and were sent an email saying some items we’d ordered weren’t available so they’d substituted them.  So far, fair enough since we can return unwanted substitutions but we’d ordered a 1kg packet of Sainsbury Raisins, Seedless, and they’d only got 500g packets so they substituted what we wanted with just one packet of the latter.  Wouldn’t somebody, anybody, even someone with the brains of a stoned worm, have realised two packets of 500g would have given us what we’d ordered?

The Pulitzer-winning novelist, Cormac McCarthy, died this week.  His most famous work was probably ‘The Road’, or ‘No Country for Old Men’ both of which were filmed, the latter by the Coen brothers almost straight from the book and the funniest line in a (very violent) film came directly from McCarthy’s words.

One of my favourite McCarthy quotations uses the pronoun problem to much better effect.  It comes from ‘Cities of the Plain’, one of the Border Trilogy, when someone is telling a friend about his plans to rebuild a shack on a top of a hill, miles from the nearest road.

“You think you’re goin’ to be able to get the truck up here?”

“I think we might, could comin’ up the other side.”

“What’s this we shit?  You got a rat in your pocket?”

Tina Turner, bad management, GB News and good management

27 May 2023

I was saddened to hear of Tina Turner’s death.  Her life story was fascinating: from picking cotton with her father to an abusive relationship with her husband Ike, to establishing herself as a solo rock singer and, until I started to know more of them, the sexiest grandmother in the world. 

Suella Braverman had almost as bad a week but is too thick to realise it.  Last year, she was caught breaking the speed limit.  This happens (I now call myself a police-trained driver) but Braverman tried to get Home Office officials to get her special treatment.  Had she gone on a course, or paid up and accepted three points on her licence at the time, none of this would have emerged.

Senior sources in government also complained this week that her grasp of facts was tenuous at best.  One said she made “basic errors” and another complained she “keeps getting facts wrong”. 

It was also Braverman who enchanted the far right with her repeated claims (which ignored the facts previously reported by her own department) that grooming gangs targeting vulnerable girls are predominantly run by British-Pakistani people because of their different “cultural values”.

And there’s a rumour she’s got something on Rishi Sunak because he hasn’t fired her yet .

English water companies have now been embarrassed into committing £10bn this decade to cleaning up their act after humiliating themselves by giving money to owners and executives instead of solving their sewage problems.  From 2010 to 2022, water companies paid their shareholders some £20bn in dividends and they’ve promised to pay good dividends in future; a Greenwich University professor has estimated could cost them another £15bn by the end of this decade.  That’s £35bn to shareholders and just £10bn more on doing their legal duty.

I only discovered this week that the ‘regulators’ don’t make the water companies disclose the volume of raw untreated sewage discharged in each overflow and – spoiler alert – they don’t volunteer the information.

“A lot of our pipework and drains are Victorian” they say.  This has, of course, been known since … er … Victorian times and was part of the infrastructure the private owners took on when the old water boards were privatised by Maggie Thatcher, whose government wrote off loans to the old companies and injected a lot of money into the new ones. 

Because each private company is effectively a monopoly (a result of England’s topography rather than a political decision), they don’t have to worry about losing customers and can pass on all their costs, including dividends to shareholders and fines for failing in their statutory duties, to those of us with taps and loos connected to their pipes.

(I used to have an aunt with a croft in Scotland who didn’t pay water rates because her water came from under a bog on the top of the hill and ran down a pipe through a couple of settlement tanks, and it was delicious, except when something died in one of the tanks.)

A small team of masochists recently monitored the output of the GB News channel which is watched by 2.8m viewers (about twice as many as watch Rupert Murdoch’s TalkTV).  It is regulated by Ofcom and says “Ofcom is very clear that due impartiality does not mean a 50:50 balance. Instead, broadcasters are required to include a range of views. Diversity of opinion is what GB News is all about.”

Ofcom says its broadcast code is clear and that opinionated hosts are fine but “alternative viewpoints must be adequately represented”.  It hasn’t specified what exactly ‘adequately’ means, but GB News believes 10-15% representation of differing views is adequate.

The masochists’ conclusion was that its content is mostly uncontentious and is basically gossip about Eurovision, Phillip Schofield’s future and Harry’s car chase, interspersed with anodyne news updates, rather like a sort of televisual Daily Mail.

What does make it contentious is the deliberately provocative anti-establishment programmes presented by fiercely right-wing hosts who pander to those on the radical right with subjects like gender, the “war on motorists”, working from home (which is “bankrupting Britain”) and, above all, the menace of migration, rather like a sort of televisual Daily Mail

They do broadcast some archly serious discussion panels that often include a left-winger (rarely a senior figure) but the radicals on the right preach their own views with no attempt to balance them.  They also read out emails and include vox pop sections where viewers urge the reintroduction of capital punishment or link the covid vaccination programme to mass murder, rather like … well, you’ve got the point.

Ofcom has said it had “issued guidance to GB News to ensure they take care when discussing conspiracy theories, given the potential harm to audiences”.

Good news comes from the organic vegetable box company Riverford.  Guy Singh-Watson, its founder, sold three-quarters of the company to its 900 employees in 2018 and is now transferring full control of the company to a trust for the benefit of its staff.  He said he will continue as a trustee, non-executive director and spokesperson for Riverford but added “Founders can hang around too long, and I don’t want to be that person who needs to be told to go.”

After looking at the possibilities and the finagling of senior politicians, he said “I have decided to make no attempts to avoid tax liability on the sale of the shares.  I’ve not set up trusts to avoid tax, even though much of the money will end up supporting charitable projects. I will pay my tax as others who can’t afford creative accountants do, and I strongly support the idea of a wealth tax.”

Britain would be a better place if more self-made millionaires thought like him.

I also discovered last week that our dog has a phobia.  He happily climbed up some modern stairs with a clear glass balustrade but refused to go back down them and I had to take him in the lift, dreading being asked why a fit young man like me was taking the lift for one floor and having to explain that the dog has vertigo.

Apology, Sidmouth, voting, royal money, Labour and Tory saboteurs, cromulence and a cobra

8 April 2023

A friend who isn’t a crossword fan failed to spot the significance of the date on last week’s mutterings and didn’t realise that they weren’t all entirely accurate.  My apologies to all those who didn’t get the clue in the first paragraph that was supposed to lead to ‘a cross tick’ (“an angry parasite”, geddit?), or ‘acrostic’, thereby inviting people to read the first letter of every paragraph in order.  It wasn’t meant to make people feel stupid, it was just intended as a bit of fun, so this week’s is deadly serious. 

Sidmouth is a pretty town with crumbling cliffs on the coast of East Devon which has hosted an annual folk festival for longer than some of us care to remember and is a good resting place on the South West coastal path, attracting thousands of visitors every year so the town’s last bank, Lloyds, will be closing in September (HSBC and Coop have already closed their branches).  Do you think their call centres have a recording saying “Thank you for holding.  Your call is important to us.  But not so important that we’re going to hire extra staff to reduce your waiting time.”?

Everybody wanting to vote in person next month must now have photo ID even though there were no prosecutions for voter impersonation last year.  According to the Electoral Commission, there were just seven allegations of ‘personation’ at local and mayoral elections and the six by-elections throughout the UK in 2022 and no police action was taken in any of these cases either because there was insufficient evidence of wrongdoing, or none at all.

Downing Street’s defence of this utterly pointless exercise said it was “to guard against the potential for wrongdoing”.  If you listen carefully, you can hear Rome burning.

The Guardian has disappointed me this week with what appears to be a republican campaign, estimating how much the royal family gets and what it owns.  They have to estimate the numbers because, even though we pay them, the family refuses to disclose their income and assets (“it’s private” they say). 

As far as we know, they’re not even the richest family in the UK and we give money to all the others as well for the stuff they sell us (like pageantry and vacuum cleaners), or they stole it from us in the past.  Since it now seems polite to apologise for our great6 grandparents’ part in the horrors of slavery, doesn’t it sound reasonable that we should ask various dukes and other nobles who inherited stuff to give back the land that was stolen from people like us by their great12 grandparents?

However, the Windsors do have one big advantage in that they are exempt from tax, even though some of them voluntarily pay what they think they should.  Wouldn’t it be better if they were subject to all the same laws and taxes as the rest of us, including capital gains and inheritance taxes?  They could always give Cornwall to the National Trust if they haven’t enough spare cash to pay what should have been paid on the Queen’s estate.

I’m not anti-monarchy but I do worry that the Guardian’s coverage looks more like a republican campaign than a simple desire to expose the inequities of rich people.

And now the government is giving £8m to allow every public authority a free portrait of King Charles.  You can tell the ministers who decided this by their brown noses.

Luckily for them, Labour has attempted political suicide by using ‘knocking copy’ which accuses the Tories in general and Rishi Sunak in particular of not imprisoning paedophiles.  This has been welcomed by the Tories and condemned by clear-thinking lefties. 

But the Conservatives have their own saboteur in the form of Suella Braverman.  She claimed “almost all” members of grooming gangs were British Pakistani men even though a 2020 Home Office report concluded that most child sexual abuse gangs comprise white men aged under 30 and there wasn’t enough evidence to suggest members of grooming gangs were disproportionately more likely to be Asian or black.

When challenged over the 18-hour delays at Dover, she also denied it was anything to do with Brexit even though Doug Bannister, the port’s chief executive, admitted a year ago that Brexit was causing longer processing times at the border.

This week has also seen reports of falling house prices.  Why do people worry about this?  If the values of houses go down across the board and we decide to move, we’d get less when selling and pay less for our new house.  People with second homes and Buy To Let landlords would lose out but who cares about them?

Suppose all property prices reduced by 90% and became worth only 10% of what they were last week.  It wouldn’t make any difference to those of us who already own our houses and would make it much easier for first-time buyers.  My first house cost about 2½ times my salary;  the same house would now cost about 25 times what I would now get doing the same job I did back then.

Mortgages could then also be reduced by 90% so it stopped people with mortgages going into negative equity.  The cost to lenders would be funded by cancelling management bonuses and taxing the Windsors …

I had a slight attack of schadenfreude when Donald Trump announced that he was going to be “indicated” [sic] and he duly was, looking rather grumpier than usual. 

Sounds cromulent to me (a new word created for The Simpsons in 1996 meaning legitimate or acceptable, which I heard for the first time this week).

And, in South Africa, a private plane flying four passengers at 11,000’ made an emergency landing at the nearest airport after a 5-foot cobra slid past the pilot’s thigh and curled up under his seat.  Everybody left the plane safely, the snake slept on, and the pilot was rewarded with a handful of Valium tablets.