Cats’ life expectancy, exclusive groups, a backward story and drugs

18 May 2024

Last Sunday, the day after I’d written about Israel realising “their ceaseless rocket attacks have probably killed the Israeli hostages that Gaza was holding”, Hamas announced that one of their Israeli hostages had died from wounds inflicted by an Israeli rocket attack.  I sometimes wonder who reads these mutterings.

Later in the week, we discovered that scientists have discovered an earth-sized planet orbiting a small, ultra-cool red dwarf star some 55 light years away (which, bearing in mind that it takes less than 1½ seconds for light to get from earth to the moon, is a long way away).  It’s about the same size as Earth and orbits its star in 17 days, which means that a year there lasts 17 days and, if I lived there, I’d be well over 1,500 years old.

How do they know there aren’t two planets of the same size relative to their ‘sun’, 180o apart, on the same plane, that take 34 days to circumnavigate the star?

On earth, a 2019 study of almost 8,000 cats by the Royal Veterinary College has shown that some breeds tend to have shorter lifespans than others and the Sphynx cat, an ugly, hairless little beast bred intentionally (and incestuously) in the 1960s, has an average lifespan of 6.8 years while Burmese and Birman cats live for an average of 14.4 years.  The average lifespan of all breeds was 11.7 years.

There are two obvious conclusions to be drawn if these results are accurate and representative of all cats in a particular breed:

  1. if you want a long-lived furry friend, get a Burmese or a Birman cat
  2. if you want to get rich, breed Sphynx cats.

Much coverage has been given to the Garrick Club’s decision to allow members to join after almost 200 years and somebody has suggested a list of women who might become members, including people like Mary Beard, Judi Dench, Elizabeth Gloster, Amber Rudd and Juliet Stevenson but it’s not clear whether these people have actually expressed an interest in joining, or even whether they were consulted before their names were mentioned.  It may be entirely misguided on my part but I’d love to have been there when Judi Dench was told she’d been suggested as a potential member.

I’m also puzzled by the people who have been named as members, though I admit some have been embarrassed enough to resign after their membership was made public.  Having turned down invitations to join various clubs over the years, I still can’t imagine wanting to join any club that excluded women but that’s basically because I feel more comfortable in the company of women than I do in the company of men. 

The limited membership problem made me think of Mensa, the organisation whose membership is limited to people who score highly on IQ tests.  I could never see the point of joining a group of people whose only common feature was enjoying doing IQ tests.

But I sometimes wonder if I’m a bit unusual.  I did a bank of tests recently and one question involved listing as many words beginning with P I could think of in a minute.  At the end, I was told I’m the first person they’d ever come across whose first suggestion was ‘pterodactyl’.

I recently read ‘A Spark of Light’ by Jodi Picoult, who presents the story backwards.  It has a thought-provoking plot, is well written and telling the story backwards adds an interesting dimension to it;  the first section is headed ‘Five p.m.’, the second ‘Four p.m.’ and so on (with an unavoidable coda headed ‘Six p.m.’)  An interesting selection for book clubs?

As we age, our senses can weaken, with a need for glasses and hearing difficulties usually the first to be recognised.  Losing our sense of smell can be harder to identify, despite its close links to memory.  Sometimes a particular smell can bring back a vivid flash of memory from decades ago and scientists are wondering if losing our sense of smell might be an early sign of the memory loss associated with dementia.  However, research has been complicated by the loss of a sense of taste, which is closely related to smell, being one of the symptoms of Covid.

Smoking also dulls the sense of smell and I remember when I gave up smoking that I smelt something, possibly cowslips, and realised I hadn’t been able to smell them for years.  This could, of course, be a good reason for smoking like a chimney if one works in a sewage plant or an abattoir.

When I first started work, every office had ashtrays, heaped high with butts and, looking back, it’s shocking to remember that we smoked in department stores, foodshops, aeroplanes, cinemas and trains – even the London underground – had special ‘no smoking’ coaches.  Nowadays, smokers have become social pariahs who huddle together in windy corners and a 2021 survey showed that the number of adult cigarette smokers in America had fallen by almost 50% in the previous 15 years.

This is bad news for tobacco companies but, as good capitalists, they reacted by offering smokeless nicotine pouches and vapes which give the illusion of smoke.  Even more disgustingly, at least to those of us who used to smoke French cigarettes with the distinctive flavour of Algerian black tobacco, vapes now come with fruit flavours, presumably to hook in younger smokers.  The pouches contain anything from 1½mg to 9mg of nicotine, compared with the 8mg to 20mg in cigarettes, of which only 1-2mg is actually absorbed.

To put the dangers of smoking into perspective, according to the Office for National Statistics, about 75,000 deaths in 2021 in England and Wales were smoking-related;  about 21,000 were alcohol-related and about 5,000 were drug-related.  The last figure includes 2,250 from opiates, 850 from cocaine and the other 1,900 from all other class A, B and C drugs, of which about 20 were related to cannabis (though more deaths from other drugs were of people who also had traces of cannabis in their system).

What nobody seems to know is the percentage of people actually using these drugs who died so these totals don’t indicate the relative lethality of the various groups (but don’t we wish we weren’t starting from here when classifying and taxing various drugs).

Defections, deterring asylum seekers, Zionist credibility and press freedom

11 May 2024

What a curious thing, when a defection from the Conservative benches to the Labour benches upsets some Labour MPs.  Natalie Elphicke, previously a far-right MP, crossed the floor, apologising for the nasty things she’d said, blaming her ex-husband, also on the far right, who’d been imprisoned for sexual offences.  And some Labour MPs were up in arms, saying “We don’t need people like that”.

Isn’t it a bit like a Jehovah’s witness making a convert then, on returning to the Witness Box (or whatever they call their headquarters), being told “Jehovah doesn’t want that sort of person”?   What happened to Luke’s “Joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance”?

We know politicians are not always the sort of people one would want to meet at a dinner party so we can let them be them and us be us, though we could perhaps make an exception and blackball the Tory candidate Susan Hall who lost her bid to be London’s mayor by a record margin.  With the complete disregard for facts, Hall said she will “never forget” how she “so nearly” defeated Sadiq Khan (who overwhelmingly won an unprecedented third term).  She added “I will never forget what we so nearly achieved”, thereby adding a whole new dimension to the word ‘nearly’.

My own recent excitement came a couple of weeks ago as my bout of man-flu was starting.  I’d been feeling a bit rough and decided what I really needed was have a bath and bed (this all at about 8pm).  So, as one does, I took off all my clothes and had a sudden attack of hypothermia, trembling so much I couldn’t stand upright or turn the taps on or get toothpaste onto the brush.  Anyway, the fascinating thing was I saw that the end two joints of all my fingers had gone chalky white and I thought how clever it was that my body had withdrawn blood from my extremities to concentrate on heating up my torso;  which was why, I realised, the extremities are the first bits of the body to get frostbite.

When I mentioned this to someone a few days later, they said this is why, if you get cold fingers, you shouldn’t try to warm them, you should concentrate on getting your body warm again and the fingers will follow.  Yes, I know, it’s obvious when you think about it but I hadn’t before.

The most recent comedy highlight was the Met Gala which involves a bunch of people parading around in what can only be called a fancy dress parade.  A picture of one of the frocks, a wonderful tent-like structure of varicoloured rags and patchwork, actually made me laugh aloud.

What I don’t understand is that these risible attempts at impressing people are created (if that’s the right word) by ‘famous’ people like a former pop singer’s daughter and the wife of a former footballer – you see, I’d even heard of some of them. 

Since no normal person would be seen dead shopping in Sainsburys in any of the costumes on show, what’s the point?  There doesn’t even seem to be a prize for the daftest costume.

But wait.  Let’s think positively about this.  The government wants to deter migrants and has so far spent an estimated £300m deporting not many people to Rwanda, which claims it will accept “thousands” rather than the 200 people mooted so far, but nowhere near the estimated 52,000 asylum seekers who would be ‘eligible’* for export.  Let’s save 99% of this money and require all asylum seekers to wear clothes that have appeared on catwalks.  If that doesn’t dissuade them from coming, they deserve the right to live here.

Mind you, if Labour wins the election, the Rwandan drain on Britain’s resources will stop because Keir Starmer has said they will end the Rwandan scheme.

Perhaps Gaza would be an alternative.  Israel under Benjamin Netanyahu has slaughtered so many tens of thousands of Gazan civilians, women and children in the hope of getting a few of the militant wing of Hamas at the same time so there’ll be room for more people.  Well, there will be after Gaza’s rebuilt all the buildings Israel’s destroyed, and given the people still squashed under them a decent funeral. 

Surely Israel would be happy to pay for the reparations since they blew everything up in the first place and they’re still delaying a ceasefire in case there’s a catch in what Hamas has agreed (and because they realise their ceaseless rocket attacks have probably killed the Israeli hostages that Gaza was holding).

Israel also shut down Al Jazeera’s local offices last weekend and admitted stealing their broadcasting equipment, claiming the news outlet was a threat to Israeli security.  A BBC team visited the scene but was prevented from filming or recording anything.

Human rights and press groups worldwide have condemned Israel’s action and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel have applied to the country’s Supreme Court for an order to overturn the ban, and the Foreign Press Association has urged the Israeli government to think again.

The problem the credibility of Israel’s announcements was horrifically illustrated in January when a car was shot at and a 6-year-old, Hind Rajab, was trapped under the dead bodies of her family.  She managed to phone the Red Crescent for help but, when the medical team arrived, they too were shot and the child’s decomposing body was only found some 12 days later.

Israel has denied any involvement in the shootings although satellite imagery proved that Israeli armoured vehicles were in the area and the damage caused to the ambulance and the car was consistent with Israeli armaments.

When celebrities are interviewed, they’re sometimes asked what they would choose as a superpower.  Mine would be to make everybody realise that everybody else is somebody’s son or daughter, and nothing else matters whether it’s race, religion, skin colour or shoe size.  Which makes us all brothers and sisters and, unless we’re seriously disturbed, we may argue with them but we don’t kill our siblings.

*          That’s ‘eligible’ in the same way as drivers are ‘eligible’ for a fine for doing 120mph along Piccadilly.

Tory triumph, presidential immunity, Gary Trudeau and blood alcohol

4 May 2024

With due ceremony, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom ventured into distant realms of his fiefdom this week to offer his personal congratulations to the most triumphant of all the Tories who had been been standing in Thursday’s local elections.  Off he trotted, all the way to Teesside, where Ben Houchen, that’s Baron Houchen of High Leven to you, had managed only to lose a third of the people who voted for him last time and held on to the Tees Valley mayoralty.

The reason for his win might have been explained is his acceptance speech in which he thanked voters for “backing my plan” and failed to mention Rishi Sunak, saying very clearly that he’d be happy to work with a Labour government if one is elected later this year.

Ah yes, that’s the sort of graciousness and loyalty we Tories expect from the chaps in the field God bless St George and all who sail in her.

Further south, the person who’d given him a peerage a couple of years ago, Boris Johnson, was refused permission to vote by a polling officer in South Oxfordshire until he went home and got a note from his mother some photo ID.  Wicked journalists leapt on this with glee because he was the prime minister who had introduced the requirement for photo ID in 2022, and the polling officer had to explain their schadenfreude to fellow volunteers.

Naturally, how the results are reported at a national level depends on the media doing the reporting:  whether they headline ‘Tories Crushed’ or ‘Labour Fails to Win Teesside’. 

Views will also differ on whether the results are likely to be repeated at a national level, with everybody’s nerves jangling as a general election approaches.

Equally fascinating, and potentially terrifying, are Donald Trump’s claims that presidents should be above the law, with a side order of ‘is a convicted criminal eligible to serve as president?’  He’s facing so many charges for so many felonies it’s difficult to know where to start but I did rather enjoy the very small triumph of the law when he was fined a token amount for contempt of court and threatened with a night in jail if he keeps on doing it.

The worrying thing is that they even have to consider a president’s criminality.  Imagine the founding fathers sitting round over a late-night pipe and a cocoa wondering whether a serial rapist who’d served their sentence should be allowed to stand as president;  or whether a school shooter, still in prison, should be allowed to stand.  Until the scribe spoke, holding up his quill in a highway that was curling up like smoke above his shoulder, and said “Come on folks, shirley that’s commonsense, and there ain’t room left here on the paper for all o’ that anyways.”

So this is now being debated with, presumably, the question of whether a president could legally pardon themselves of a crime for which they’d been convicted, or whether they would have to recuse themselves.  And what would happen if they failed to do so.

Just think of the implications of the unlimited power that the ability to pardon oneself for any crime, not just ‘official’ ones, would give to a crook, or a mafia boss;  and if the power isn’t unlimited, where would the line be drawn between ‘official’ crimes that are OK and can be pardoned, and ‘unofficial’ crimes that can’t?

One of the supreme court judges has even proposed that presidents who weren’t immune from prosecution for ‘official’ acts might then face prosecution when their term ended, and this would put a stable democracy at risk.  I can’t see the link myself but he’s a Republican and America supreme court judges are political appointments and base their decisions on political expediency, not the law, which itself destabilises what they like to consider a stable democracy.

Sadly, there have been moves in Britain to empower the government of the day to overrule the judiciary’s understanding of statute and case law, so our own democracy is also teetering.

Incidentally, Gary Trudeau, the American, Pulitzer prize-winning cartoonist and satirist, is not the first person to suggest that Trump is suffering from dementia, offering real quotations as evidence.  His work is syndicated to 1,000 daily and Sunday newspapers worldwide and is accessible online.  If you don’t know it and enjoy wry smiles, he is brilliant and his Doonesbury strips are well worth a look.

A few days ago, I decided not to do any muttering this week because I’ve been feeling a bit under the weather (which, thank you for asking, is bright and sunny today – Dog thinks the sky has fallen) and wondered about pulling a sickie. 

Do you know I always thought ‘pulling a sickie’ was a joke but, when I was in Australia many years ago, we were planning a trip with a local who had taken all their leave for the year, and they said “well, I’ve still got some sickies left”.

Then I heard of something called ‘auto-brewery syndrome’ and thought you might like to know about it.  It’s very rare but the body manufactures its own alcohol which gets into the bloodstream and teetotallers can get busted for drink-driving unless they can produce a note from their mother countersigned by a medic or two confirming that such a condition does actually exist, and they have it.  So I sat down at the keyboard and out this came, stream of consciousness stuff.

By the way, I’ve only intentionally mangled two and a half quotations in the seventh paragraph but if you can find more, do let me know.

My two bad weeks, migrants and sewage

27 April 2024

Do you ever have one of those weeks when you think that at least next week can’t be any worse, then it is?

Two weeks ago, I was on my way to the local hospital to give a friend and her 17-day old baby a lift home, crawling through traffic and stopping in queues at traffic lights.  When the lights changed, I drove forward slowly, signalled and turned left into a narrow one-way street where a bicycle was coming the wrong way towards me in the middle of the road, so I stopped, but the car behind me didn’t.  According to my dashcam, I was doing 3mph when I was hit, having braked from 11mph in 2 seconds.  From the extent of the damage caused to both cars, the driver behind was obviously still accelerating.

Nobody was hurt and my first reaction was “buggrit, another 24 hours of unnecessary paperwork”.  This has turned out to be a gross underestimate.

Two days later, the other car shed its brake fluid (three weeks after it had been changed as part of a service and MOT).  Luckily, we had just got home when the dashboard flashed up a message in unfriendly red letters saying “STOP, DRIVE NO MORE, YOU WILL DIE, YOU’VE DRIBBLED ALL YOUR BRAKE FLUID ONTO THE ROAD, YOU HAVE NO BRAKES, WE’RE SORRY FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE THIS MAY CAUSE, THANK YOU FOR HOLDING, YOU ARE NUMBER 117 IN THE QUEUE”.

Followed by writing a report for the insurance company and attaching a map, a sketch plan, details of the cyclist, a witness and the other driver, 7 pictures of the damage, and a video clip from my dashcam.  Did you know that Direct Line’s email address for claims don’t accept movie clips so you have to start again and upload them to a different link?

The paperwork and phone calls from insurers, repairers and the replacement car people, none of whom seem to talk to each other, were followed by a trip to the repairers who took more pictures and said of course they wouldn’t know how much damage had been done until they could see the panels under the damaged bumper.

(Naturally, my policy needs renewing in four weeks so I’m having to confess that yes I’ve had an accident but no I haven’t got the foggiest what it’ll cost.)

This week, the Sainsbury delivery didn’t arrive in the morning when it was supposed to and, two hours later, they emailed to say that all deliveries had been cancelled because their computer system had broken and here’s £20 compensation.  No food, just £20, and no word about why this warning wasn’t sent before the delivery was due. 

Then we went to the hospital for a 6-week check-up on my wife’s eyes – their third attempt at an appointment after they’d cancelled the first two – and got chucked out because they hadn’t read the bit on her file about the need for a hoist to transfer her a gurney / bed.  They then rang later to say the earliest they could do was late May so we had a friendly chat about whether a 13-week gap was OK instead of a 6-week gap (it wasn’t last time).  I asked them to check with the consultant and they finally rang back to say we could come in on Monday and, if we came in 4 hours earlier, they could do two procedures at once.  So I had to ring the dentist to delay the appointment I had booked into that 4 hours.

Next Monday is the day our car is being collected for repair and the replacement car is being delivered.  Guess whether the same person can drive the replacement car here and go back in the (driveable) damaged car.

The whole process is almost as convincing as Rishi Sunak’s law allowing him to send migrants to Rwanda, which he had to bully through parliament this week.  Rwanda is a central African country with lots of sunshine which, despite a history of genocide and human rights abuses, is now united under a democratically-elected leader of immense charm who regularly gets more than 95% of the vote and Sunak’s new law declares it is now absolutely safe for migrants who will probably be accommodated in luxury hotels overlooking Rwanda’s sunlit beaches*.

Sunak has said that, if migrants know they’re going to be shipped from the UK straight out to Rwanda, this will deter them from crossing the Channel.  He doesn’t seem to have thought this through because, if Rwanda really is that safe, migrants will be rushing across the Channel and saying ”Sod UK visas, where’s my boarding card for the next flight to Rwanda”.

Sheer brilliance.  Same as “stopping the boats” or, as the old proverb has it “treating the symptom, not the cause”.  First, many of us don’t care about the boats and think it’s the people in them who are important, and second, if there was an international police effort to remove all the traffickers from circulation, the ‘passengers’ wouldn’t be forced to pay huge sums of money to criminal gangs to risk their lives in leaky boats.

While on a roll, the Conservatives have also forced through a requirement that water companies should prioritise profits over sewage in rivers, lakes and the sea.  This would be OK if they were required to factor in absolutely massive fines they should pay every single time they allowed sewerage to ‘escape’ into our natural waters. They’d owe us money by Thursday week.

Why don’t they just renationalise the lot?  The Tories have already quietly renationalised a large proportion of the railway network, at least one major artery of which now seems to be making more money than when it was privatised despite the same people running it, and Kier Starmer has promised that, if Labour’s elected, they’ll reclaim the rest when their contracts expire.

Hurriedly changing the subject as I rush to the end, have you heard of ‘auto-brewery syndrome’?  Neither had I.  It’s very rare but the bodies of people with it make their own alcohol and risk failing a breath test even if they’re teetotal.

*          As I’m sure you know, Rwanda doesn’t actually have a coast.

Carers abused, Sure Start and revenge

21 April 2024

There are some 5 million carers in the UK, about 1 million of whom claim carer’s allowance. Carers generally have had a lot of coverage in the press recently, encouraged by the revelation that the Department for Work and Pensions has been fining tens of thousands of people who have been claiming the £81.90 per week carer’s allowance (for a full-time carer, that’s just under 50p an hour with no holidays) while inadvertently earning more than the permitted maximum in part-time work. 

Even if the limit is exceeded by only £1, the entire benefit is disallowed (with no marginal or tapering relief, huge penalties build up very quickly)

The problem is that, even if the earnings limit is exceeded by as little as £1, claimants automatically lose the entire carer’s allowance. This results in a “cliff edge” repayment penalty unmatched in its severity in the benefits system despite an estimated 44% of its claimants classified as being ‘in poverty’.

The regulations that define how much a carer can earn without having to forfeit some or all of their allowance are labyrinthine and the benefit is means-tested so even a minimal infringement leads to the DWP imposing fines of thousands of pounds, with the risk of a prison sentence if the carer can’t afford to pay the fine. 

Brilliant isn’t it!  Somebody is giving care that would otherwise have to be funded by the state but they’re willing to imprison ‘offenders’ and put the cost of caring back onto the state.

(I must here disclose a personal interest:  I am a 24/7 carer for a severely disabled person but I do not claim the carer’s allowance.)

In July 2019, the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee, looked into overpayments of carer’s allowance and concluded that the vast majority of earnings-related overpayments were the result of “honest mistakes” by carers and that administrative failures by DWP allowed the overpayments to spiral, often a long time and many thousands of pounds later, before they told carers they wanted their money back.

The 2019 report said “The Department could, and should, have got to grips with the problems in Carer’s Allowance much more quickly” and urged the government to take action to limit the risk to claimants.

In the 5 years since the report was published, the Conservatives haven’t yet acted on the recommendations but, even though they’ve proved themselves highly skilled at choosing the wrong leaders and then replacing them, this is little comfort to poorer carers.

Earlier this week, the Institute for Fiscal Studies published new research into the long-term effectiveness of the Sure Start programme, set up by the Labour government in 1998 and regarded as one of its most successful policies.  Sure Start linked early years, health and family support services for poor children in disadvantaged areas.

The follow-up study showed that the scheme had significantly improved the life chances of children who had been eligible for free school meals and had access to a Sure Start centre:  they did three grades better at GCSE – like getting five Cs instead of two Cs and three Ds – when compared with similar poor children without access to Sure Start.

The study also showed that younger children with special educational needs were identified much sooner and their problems were identified when they were younger, thereby reducing the need for education, health and care plans later.

The Tories closed Sure Start down to save money.

If you believe the Guardian is written by the spawn of the devil, skip this paragraph because it’s just won a diversity award at the Press Awards after researching and publishing its founders’ links to the transatlantic slave trade in what the judges called “breathtakingly honest mea culpa”, adding that it was “a hugely thoughtful and comprehensive project that provides a groundbreaking example of how an organisation addresses historical links to slavery”.  How many other publications would dare to be this honest?

Certainly not Liz Truss’s book (Remember her?  Record-breaking prime minister?) which should have been called ‘Mea non culpa’ or ‘I was the only one in step’.  I’m ashamed to admit that I almost feel sorry for somebody who is so deluded.

Truss’s credo seems to have extended into the police force.  We’re being invited to elect a new police commissioner locally on the basis of their politics;  there’s no mention of experience of policing or justice.  How long before the police ask how you vote before deciding whether to arrest you?  I’m tempted to spoil my ballot paper.

Talking of delusion, Donald Trump, former president of the most powerful country of the world, a man with whom you’d feel as safe as you would if a two-year old had a tantrum while carrying a machine gun, you remember him, orange make up, starched and dyed combover, pouty little mouth, fancies his daughter, unfaithful husband and serial groper … anyway, he’s been in court while jurors are selected for his trial on criminal charges and he keeps been falling asleep.  His eyes shut, his head dropped forward and he drooled but he said he wasn’t asleep, he was thinking.  When he actually was awake, his expression was a sight to see:  Trump the Grump.

Dubai had 18 months’ rain in 24 hours earlier this week, which was described by a meteorologist as a “very rare rainfall event”.  We’ve had quite a few rainfall events here over the last 3 months but we call them showers or storms.

In the Middle East, Israel is still trying to kill all Palestinians in Gaza and, as a side show, recently arranged to launch a rocket attack on Iran so Iran naturally had to retaliate by attacking Israel with over 100 rockets and Israel promised to get their revenge with another attack on Iran, and so on.  When does revenge stop?

This is the way the world ends, not with a whimper but with a “he started it, no he started it, no he started it, no he started it … Ma, he’s throwing bombs at me.”

Media influences and people with worries about gender

13 April 2024

Isn’t it worrying how we develop opinions about people based on just what our favoured media tell us about them!  What brought this to mind was Thursday’s news that OJ Simpson had died (two months after saying was receiving chemotherapy for prostate cancer).

I haven’t read a transcript of the proceedings of his trial and saw little more than headlines at the time so all I know is that, in 1995, he was tried for the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman, and was acquitted;  and I’ve only just discovered that the OJ stood for Orenthal James.

It seemed clear at the time that many people had formed their own opinions about whether or not he did kill them.  Some thought that, because the defence showed he couldn’t get a pair of blood-stained gloves onto his hands, it couldn’t have been him, though I don’t remember hearing any evidence about DNA evidence taken from the inside of the gloves before he tried them on.  Others thought the prosecution case and his flight from the police (even though it was carried out in slo-mo) were sufficient to convict him.

In another case, Oscar Pistorius shot his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp in 2013.  Pistorius didn’t deny having fired the shots that killed her but said he shot through a bathroom door at what he thought was an intruder.  The prosecution case highlighted apparent inconsistencies in his story and he spent near 9 years in prison after being found guilty after a trial that might possibly have produced a ‘not proven’ verdict had it been held in Scotland.

In both cases, many people seemed to believe that one or both were guilty, or innocent, and that justice was, or wasn’t done.  But how do they come to these conclusions?  From the bits and pieces given to us by the media, or from the fact that Simpson was a good-looking man and Pistorius was an Olympic champion despite having lost the bottom half of both legs?

Many people seem to have the same problem with various aspects of the LGBTQ+ acronym, despite never having been there themselves. However, before muttering, I must make two confessions:  I wasn’t committed to a boarding school and surrounded by bullies and pederasts and I spent far too much time trainspotting to pass through the homosexual phase that many boys are supposed to pass through.

So I don’t really understand why some people get so exercised over people who are in one of the groups that they’re not?  Take ‘trans’ people, who seem to have been getting a lot of press coverage recently.  We all know that, at birth, the genitals can appear quite similar and medics don’t necessarily spend a lot of time assigning a gender to neonates.  Indeed, even adults’ visible genitals come in a wide range of shapes and sizes and, internally, their structure is very similar;  and that’s a few of their physical differences.

Inside their heads, people experience life very differently and, from a very young age, some believe their gender was assigned wrongly at birth and they’re inhabiting the wrong body.  (The debate about nature versus nurture is different.) 

There’s also a huge overlap between masculine and feminine. While a group of us at work were chatting once, one of my staff said she thought I was a very feminine man.  I said “Thank you, I take that as a compliment”, she said “It was meant to be” and the conversation moved on.  I wonder how I’d have felt if I weren’t comfy with being as I am.

But there are people out there, including one famous author, who believe that people with penises are men, even if they choose to live as women;  and, presumably, men who have surgery and chemicals to reconstruct their bodies, are just as disgusting as women who choose to live as men. 

If it makes them happy, why should anybody else care?  Surely people are kind and thoughtful or selfish and cruel regardless of the shape of their bodies;  and, if they spend time worrying about gender identity, perhaps they’re a bit uncertain about their own identity and are over-compensating.

Donald Trump appears to be a good example of uncertainty, believing that women exist to have their fannies groped so men can share the experiences in locker rooms, and women shouldn’t be allowed to have abortions after being raped, even though the foetus is 50% rapist. 

Actually, Trump probably isn’t the best example because there are so many loose connections in his head that it’s never clear whether he does feel insecure or is just ‘neurologically divergent’.  Consider Trump’s criticism of Joe Biden in his Georgia response to the State of the Union (in this unedited quotation, you can actually hear his synapses making random connections):

“Somebody said he looks great in a bathing suit, right? And you know, when he was in the sand and he was having a hard time lifting his feet through the sand, because you know sand is heavy, they figured three solid ounces per foot, but sand is a little heavy, and he’s sitting in a bathing suit. Look, at 81, do you remember Cary Grant? How good was Cary Grant, right? I don’t think Cary Grant, he was good. I don’t know what happened to movie stars today. We used to have Cary Grant and Clark Gable and all these people. Today we have, I won’t say names, because I don’t need enemies. I don’t need enemies. I got enough enemies. But Cary Grant was, like – Michael Jackson once told me, ‘The most handsome man, Trump, in the world.’ ‘Who?’ ‘Cary Grant.’ Well, we don’t have that any more, but Cary Grant at 81 or 82, going on 100. This guy, he’s 81, going on 100. Cary Grant wouldn’t look too good in a bathing suit, either. And he was pretty good-looking, right?”

This is somebody who could become America’s next president thanks to a bunch of idiots and an electoral system that is even more dysfunctional than Britain’s.

Exit through the gift shop.

Motion and change, Israeli pogrom and private sewers

6 April 2024

We know that everything is in motion, from sub-atomic particles, to the corpuscles churning through our veins, to the fragmentation of Gondwanaland to the moon revolving round the earth which is revolving around the sun to the expansion of spacetime itself.  We also know that if nothing moved, everything would stop and become no more than a snapshot on the wall of the gods’ dining room on the second floor of the ninth dimension.

We also know that motion changes things, and that change involves motion.  Everything moves all the time, some things faster than others, but everything is in motion.

Just imagine time stops.  No ticking clock, no beating of the heart.  Everything is frozen because things can’t move without taking time to do it.  Or imagine, things stop moving.  How do you know if you haven’t got time to measure that time has passed but nothing’s moved.

All this means is that time and space (i.e. just stuff, from ants’ breakfasts to dark energy) are inseparable and that’s where we live, in spacetime which is constantly changing, so there’s no point trying to resist change.  Or to welcome it come to that;  we just have to accept that things are changing all the time.                                                        

Luckily, our awareness of these changes is limited to those that affect the way we live and those we are hear about here and now.  Of course the past influences us now but, if we did something yesterday that we now regret, we can’t go back and change it.  If it affected someone else, we can apologise and try to put it right but, if we can’t, we shouldn’t worry about it.  People who feel regret or sadness for something that happened are living in the past, which can’t changed.

The flipside is that if we worry about what might happen tomorrow or the next day, we’re living in the future, and all we can do is take precautions today to protect us when tomorrow comes:  save money now for a pension and, if you haven’t got enough money to do this, stop worrying about it;  worry won’t give you a pension fund but it will make you feel bad.

In practice, we need to make some preparations for the morrow, but we can only make them now.  If I haven’t got a clean pair of pants for tomorrow, I’ll do a wash today and make sure they’re dry before I need them;  there’s nowt worse than soggy pants, and I speak as someone who waited till the transfer bus came into sight before I left the sea in Corfu, pulled my jeans over a wet bathing costume, added a T-shirt, picked up my case and boarded the bus.

Six hours later, we were all still sitting sealed in a plane at Corfu airport as it got hotter and hotter while the crew tried to start the engine.  They finally gave up, bussed us to a local hotel and checked us in for the night.  In the room I stripped off my (by then) damp jeans and hung them over a chair on the balcony, then put my wet swimming costume in a plastic bag.  There are some joys in life that we don’t recognise until we experience them.

There seem to have been too many changes in the world recently and the only one that even veers in the right direction is the internal combustion of the Tory party.  Incidentally, of which man was it recently written by one of his own people saying “His madness has been described as “delusional” and “terrifying”, adding “This man is putting us all at risk:  Our future, our children’s future, the strategic alliance that is the keystone of [our country’s] national security.”  Others, also of his own people, have said he’s “off the rails” and an existential danger to [his country].  He must be gone from our lives”?

  • Boris Johnson
  • Donald Trump
  • Benjamin Netanyahu
  • Vladimir Putin

The correct answer is Netanyahu but it could be any of them and that’s what frightens me. 

His recent murders included precision attacks on an aid convoy run by World Central Kitchen that killed seven people in three trucks that weren’t travelling in convoy but had up to a mile between them, taking supplies to people who are being exterminated by Israel.  You’d think that, knowing what had happened to Jews in the Second World War, some of the Jewish leaders of Israel would see the similarities with what their state is now doing to Gazans.

Even Joe Biden, hitherto having failed to condemn Israel, seems to have come off the fence and more than 600 UK lawyers, including three former supreme court justices, have warned the government that it’s breaking international law by continuing to send arms to Israel.  A friend has said “Aha, but we import more arms from Israel than we export to them.”  I have no idea if this is true but, if it is, why don’t we increase our imports of weapons from them to reduce the stocks they’re using to kill charity volunteers and starving Gazans who Israel has forced out of their homes into concentration refugee camps?

Back at the ranch, all we can offer is the chance to share what used to be the clear waters of rivers, lakes and beaches with piles of shit, shredded lavatory paper and used condoms.  The water companies that were privatised (surely one of the stupidest decisions a UK government every made) (well, along with the railways) knew they were taking on crumbling Victorian sewerage infrastructure but, rather than plan for its replacement, chose to give a lot of its income to its management and shareholders instead.

Britain’s biggest water company, Thames Water, now seems to be on the point of being renationalised and South West Water blames its problems on having more coastline than any other British water company.  Really?  And this wasn’t known when it was privatised?  You’ll probably find Slartibartfast’s signature in one of Cornwall’s smaller coves.

£100,000 a year, social care costs and the ethics of electioneering

30 March 2024

The vast gulf between the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s beliefs and his grasp of reality was terrifyingly illustrated in a recent tweet in which he said £100,000 is “not a huge salary” for people in South West Surrey.  He was even stupid enough to repeat this fantasy to Laura Kuenssberg in an interview last weekend when he said £100,000 a year “doesn’t go as far as you might think” and added that “even on those higher salaries, people are feeling under pressure” because of housing costs, childcare and taxes (oh, come on, all of us whose income is high enough pay taxes).  And childcare?  What about the helicopter?

This is the sort of “pressure” many millions of people would sell their soul for. 

The median pay for a full-time worker last year was £34,963, which means that half of all full-time workers were paid less than that. 

I have a friend, a single parent of a 6-year old, who only gets Income Support and Child Benefit totalling just over £13,000 a year.  They live in a tiny housing association property paying rent of £6,000 a year plus energy bills, car insurance, phone etc, which leaves almost exactly nothing for food, clothing and treats such as a sandwich from Greggs.  I give them what I can to help but, according to a recent survey, there are 4,300,000 children in the UK below the official poverty line;  sadly I can’t help them and the government won’t. 

In a feeble attempt at self-defence, Jeremy Hunt* did say the UK had been through a “very very tough patch”, caused primarily by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  Excuse me!  How long have you people been in power?  And whose austerity policies started the decay?

It’s no better in America where, according to research by Americans for Tax Fairness and the Institute for Policy Studies, senior management at 35 of the largest companies were given more than their companies paid in federal taxes between 2018 and 2022; and, in the UK, Chris O’Shea, Centrica’s boss, will be getting £8.2m this year, nearly double what he got last year when he said his pay was “impossible to justify”.    No doubt he’ll trouser it anyway.

Just in case you hadn’t noticed, this makes me very angry, and what makes it worse is that there’s absolutely nothing I can do about it …

At the other end of life, the problems are just as great when someone becomes unable to take care of themselves, even if they’ve paid their taxes all their lives.

A series of three programmes shown recently on TV told the story of a well-known broadcaster, Kate Garroway, as she watched her husband, Derek Draper, decline and die, needing increasing care as he weakened.  The trilogy started in May 2023 with her husband saying he wants to be on camera and “I want to be heard” even though he already needed intensive, round-the-clock care.

Since only people with very low incomes and high needs qualify for state-funded care, care for his basic needs cost £4,000 a week before the additional costs of therapeutic support.  Needing care is an expensive business because, in the absence of government funding, capitalists have pounced on care services and make themselves huge profits by bankrupting the needy. 

After being told Draper wasn’t ill enough to qualify for state support, Garroway appealed against the decision three years ago but is still awaiting a reply even though Draper died in January.

She has admitted she gets a generous salary but even this wasn’t enough and unofficial reports, not mentioned in the programme, say she’s now some £800,000 in debt.

For those of us who are full-time carers for a family member who is physically disabled and entirely reliant on a wheelchair and hoists as well as suffering from dementia, the costs are still terrifying.  Our ¾ hour of care per day costs more than £10,000 a year and respite breaks in residential care home cost about £1,500 a week;  even full-time care costs about £70,000 a year.  So, for respite care, we’ve chosen a (lovely) care home run by a charity, knowing that greedy owners won’t take a third of our payments straight into their piggy banks (emphasis on piggy, not banks).  It’s also why I’m giving money to friends and other charities now because I won’t be able to afford to when our savings run out.

And, sooner or later, the money will run out and we’ll have to sell the house, claim utterly inadequate benefits and then take the pills.

This makes me more sad than angry.  I paid every penny of tax and national insurance contributions due while I was working and it’s being given to Jeremy Hunt and people running companies on government contracts who believe £100,000 a year doesn’t go as far as you think it might.  Well, mush, it would keep us out of the workhouse for the rest of our lives and we are (or were) relatively comfortable;  just think what it would do to people who are not as fortunate as we are.

And, heaven help us all, the Conservative want to get themselves back into the power they’ve abused so appallingly over the last 14 years.  Since they’ve achieved so little so far, they’re desperate enough to produce ‘knocking copy’ to support the Conservative who’s standing as their candidate to become the next mayor of London. 

Sadiq Khan may not be perfect but does London need a Conservative who produces an advertisement showing scenes of people running away from suspected gunshots through a crowded underground station, captioned “London under Labour has become a crime capital of the world”?  Apart from the caption being bollocks, the pictures were actually taken in New York’s Penn station.

Yes, I know the pictures were removed from the ads after thousands of horrified complaints, but they’re the sort of people who thought it was OK in the first place.

And Shamima Begum remains stateless after latest appeal against the removal of her perfectly legal British passport was removed.

Stop the world, I want to get off.

*          This Jeremy Hunt is of course the same person who screwed the NHS when he was Health Minister all those years ago. 

Vets, fruit, dogs, Strine and what’s under our feet

23 March 2024

Those of you not privileged enough to get the Guardian will have missed a piece in last Saturday’s issue by Lucy Mangan.  Talking about the recent exposure of how vets, especially those that are part of large groups, charge extortionate amounts to people who feel they must do their best for their beloved pets, she said “As the owner of two cats whom I love more than life itself (well, one of whom I love more than life itself – the other one and I are in talks), … I am shocked. And as an upstanding member of western capitalist society, I am appalled to learn that the profit motive could ever lead to unethical behaviour or any kind of corruption, major or minor.”

The idea of her being “in talks” with the “other” cat made me hoot with laughter, leaving half a mouthful of my lunch spread over the table.  Then of course I had to read it to my wife without giggling.

Down under, a fruit and vegetable producer in New South Wales has just won the title for the world’s heaviest blueberry with a fruit that weighed 20.4 gms and is 39.3mm wide.  Isn’t it wonderful how different we all are!  Brad Hocking decided to see if it was a world record;  I’d have wanted to know what it tasted like.

But they do have strange tastes in Australia.  I once asked if they had any proper beer, tasting of hops, served at room temperature with a slight scum on the top.  The response was along the lines of “Bloody whingeing pom.  Beer should be cold, fizzy and taste of aluminium.”  I resisted the temptation to point out that’s lager not beer and, if they can grow massive blueberries, why can’t they manage humble hops, because Bruce – I’m sure that was his name – was twice my height and proportionally muscled.

They also have their own language, collected in a 1965 book called Let Stalk Strine by Afferbeck Lauder*.  It includes translations of ‘Emma Chisit” (“how much is it”), ‘Gunga Din’ (as in “I gunga din, the door slokt”), “Egg nishner” (that keeps you cool in hot weather) and ‘Tiger’ (as in “Tiger look at this, Reg”).

Which inevitably leads to French Bulldogs, flat-faced little dogs that have been bred by vets so they can’t breathe properly without unbelievably expensive treatment.  They’re accepted at Crufts and have become favourites of the sort of female ‘celebrities’ who like to be papped with something furry nuzzling their paps.

According to the RSPCA, their appeal is fading and the number being dumped has risen from 8 in 2020 to 582 in 2023.  The number of other breeds being dumped has also increased but the French Bulldog is the top reject.  Strangely, Staffordshire bull terriers are also being rejected, probably because they’re associated with those illegal bull terriers that go deaf when the ‘owner’ says “Let Go. Give. GIVE.  That’s my doughnut.”  Actually Staffies are rather nice little dogs and rate very highly for being good with children.

As any fule kno, scientists only have a basic ‘understanding’ of what 15% of the universe is made of so they labelled the 85% ‘dark matter’ or ‘dark energy’ (one always feels better if something inexplicable is given a name).  It doesn’t react with electronic forces or light so, basically, it could be anything from an overlap with another universe to the smell left by the iguanas of the gods.

Perhaps I’m alone in thinking this is slightly arrogant for a species that discovered the uses of electricity about 180 years ago and inhabits a microscopic particle of dust in an unimaginably vast universe that came into being about 13,700,000,000 years ago.  In fact, we don’t even inhabit this particle of dust, we live on its very thin skin and know very little about what’s under it.

For instance, we do know that the magnetic north and south poles swap over every so often and scientists have only hypothesised about why this might happen, and when it’s going to change again.  I just worry whether my satnav will still work.

It’s almost 4,000 miles to the centre of the earth and we know very little about the vast bulk of it.  Even one mile down, it is noticeable warmer than on the surface.  It’s thought that the centre is a viscous liquid (if molten rock can be called liquid) with tectonic plates floating around on top of it, tearing the surface apart (at geological speeds) so magma can spurt upwards through the gaps, or crunching together and buckling the surface to throw up mountain ranges like the Himalayas and the Alps.

In an article just published in Nature, scientists from a range of institutions including the California Institute of Technology and NASA’s Ames Research Center claim that the two huge, anomalous structures buried 1800 metres below the surface under the Pacific Ocean and Africa are remains of the ancient planet Theia which, it’s generally agreed, crashed into the earth millions of years ago.

The study was led by Dr Qian Yuan, a geophysicist at Caltech, who believes that this would explain the existence of these “large low-velocity provinces”, or LLVPs, that were first discovered in the 1980s.

And just room for another bit of fascinating information contrasting the tails of dogs and wolves.  It’s been found that hand-reared dog pups wag their tails far more often than hand-reared wolf pups and dogs wag their tails to the right when something has pleased them, and to the left when they are submissive in threatening situations.  Mind you, somebody else has suggested that dogs wag their tails in more than 30 different ways so who knows.  Our dog certainly has very expressive ears that he can operate independently – his favourite position is combined with a look that says “Did you see me back there with the other dog, I was very good wasn’t I, do I get a treat?”

*   You guessed it of course:  alphabetical order.

LTNs, angry politicians, extremism and kindness

16 March 2024

Recent surveys have shown that the government misjudged public reaction to low traffic neighbourhoods.  Not all have worked as hoped but most of the schemes launched four years ago are still in place, making the government’s pledge to get rid of “anti-car measures” rather stupid.  A recent study commissioned by Rishi Sunak showed that support for LTNs in Birmingham, London, Wigan and York averaged 45%, with only 21% opposing them.  Curiously, this report disappeared into the bowels of Whitehall and only became public after it was leaked.

Israel doesn’t need surveys because Amicai Eliyahu, the Israeli Minister of Heritage, has unilaterally called for the Muslim month of Ramadan (which started last week) to be “wiped out”.  Do we need a clearer example of the gulf between Judaism and Zionism?  Ramadan Kareem to all Muslims everywhere.

The former Conservative Lee Anderson is just as prejudiced, describing a pro-Palestinian march as “an angry baying mob” and adding “This is a murderous, vile, wicked thing that we see on our streets, and the police are doing nothing”, blaming Sadiq Khan, London’s mayor, for demonstrations taking place all over the country.  He also said “In the real world, my parents are watching this on TV every night and they’re disgusted.”  If anyone know this Anderson geezer, perhaps they could get him to tell his parents how to use the off switch, and where the Valium is kept.

Luckily, another nasty piece of work, Michael Gove (yes that Gove, the one who screwed the education systems for an entire generation of hapless children), is taking action against extremism.  Entirely the wrong action but he’s taking action. 

He’s planning to define extremist groups and individuals by their motivations rather than by their actions and is claiming this new definition will tackle the rise of Islamophobia and anti-Semitism in Britain.  This was of course the Gove who described Israel as “a light to the world” at a Conservative Friends of Israel event in 2017 but he’s now defining extremism very widely as anything affecting “the fundamental rights and freedoms of others” or “the UK’s system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights”. 

Just to cover all bases, he’s included anything that would “intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve” either of the above aims but he’s said the policy will be “non-statutory” and he’ll be preparing a list of extremist organisations and individuals, which is even more worrying, and irritating little groups like Stop Oil, Greenpeace and even Black Lives Matter could be included.

Another draconian power to be taken away from the justice system and given to the police whose objectivity is … er … good heavens, is that the time?

Even more worryingly, possibly as part of the government’s commitment to destroying the NHS and transferring its money to private business owners, it now seems they’re defrocking competent medics for their personal beliefs.

Talk about a barss ackwards approach to controlling extremism.

I wouldn’t mind being arrested for doing something (in fact I was once, on a peaceful sit-down CND demonstration a long time ago – fined £1 and given a week to pay since you ask) but I’d object like hell to being arrested for giving money to Greenpeace. 

I’ve always been much more concerned about the competence of a medic than whether they believe that Tommy Robinson is God and the ‘wokerati’ are Satan’s acolytes, or that the climate emergency is going to destroy the world our children will have to live in.  However, Dr Sarah Benn, who was a Birmingham GP, is intelligent enough to worry about this and has become an activist – sorry, ‘extremist’ – and has been arrested and imprisoned several times for trying to draw attention to the coming environmental crisis.

Doctors must tell the General Medical Council if they are charged with or convicted of a criminal offence but Benn went beyond this by telling the GMC and her local NHS employerevery time she was arrested, saying “There is no guidance as to any kind of protest or activist-related stuff by the GMC … but I wanted to be transparent.”

And on to an even nastier piece of work:  Frank Hester, the Conservative party’s biggest donor, who said that looking at Diane Abbott, Britain’s longest-serving black MP, made “you want to hate all black women” and said she “should be shot”.  In a subsequent statement, Hester said he admitted he’d been rude about her but “the criticism had nothing to do with her gender nor colour of skin”.  I worry about people who don’t understand what they say.

According to GBNews, “Senior and well-placed Tories have confirmed to GB News that the Tories are in talks about the additional £5million donation from Frank Hester, in additional (sic) to the £10million which the millionaire businessman gave to the party last year” so he hasn’t even got the entire party onside.  Rishi Sunak called Hester’s remarks “racist and wrong” but has so far refused to return the £15m to Hester, and he’s right not to do so:  the £15m shouldn’t be returned to Hester (for whom it would effectively be tax-free income), it should be given to charities working on feminist and racist issues, perhaps even Black Lives Matter because that would piss Gove off.

Coincidentally, Hester’s software firm has coincidentally been awarded lucrative NHS and prison contracts coincidentally by the government …

The BIG story of the week was that a mother had edited a family photograph before letting anyone see it and caused a tremendous fuss.  Elsewhere, photographers whose pictures have won prizes explain how they took them and how they had subsequently adjusted the images.

But, without doubt, the best story of the week was that Esther Ghey, Brianna’s mother, met Emma Sutton, mother of one of Brianna’s murderers.  “I don’t blame her for what her child has done” Ghey said and the two of them discussed “the challenges of parenting”.  Doesn’t the world need more people like her to demonstrate the power of kindness:  Esther Ghey, I love you.