21 April 2024
There are some 5 million carers in the UK, about 1 million of whom claim carer’s allowance. Carers generally have had a lot of coverage in the press recently, encouraged by the revelation that the Department for Work and Pensions has been fining tens of thousands of people who have been claiming the £81.90 per week carer’s allowance (for a full-time carer, that’s just under 50p an hour with no holidays) while inadvertently earning more than the permitted maximum in part-time work.
Even if the limit is exceeded by only £1, the entire benefit is disallowed (with no marginal or tapering relief, huge penalties build up very quickly)
The problem is that, even if the earnings limit is exceeded by as little as £1, claimants automatically lose the entire carer’s allowance. This results in a “cliff edge” repayment penalty unmatched in its severity in the benefits system despite an estimated 44% of its claimants classified as being ‘in poverty’.
The regulations that define how much a carer can earn without having to forfeit some or all of their allowance are labyrinthine and the benefit is means-tested so even a minimal infringement leads to the DWP imposing fines of thousands of pounds, with the risk of a prison sentence if the carer can’t afford to pay the fine.
Brilliant isn’t it! Somebody is giving care that would otherwise have to be funded by the state but they’re willing to imprison ‘offenders’ and put the cost of caring back onto the state.
(I must here disclose a personal interest: I am a 24/7 carer for a severely disabled person but I do not claim the carer’s allowance.)
In July 2019, the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee, looked into overpayments of carer’s allowance and concluded that the vast majority of earnings-related overpayments were the result of “honest mistakes” by carers and that administrative failures by DWP allowed the overpayments to spiral, often a long time and many thousands of pounds later, before they told carers they wanted their money back.
The 2019 report said “The Department could, and should, have got to grips with the problems in Carer’s Allowance much more quickly” and urged the government to take action to limit the risk to claimants.
In the 5 years since the report was published, the Conservatives haven’t yet acted on the recommendations but, even though they’ve proved themselves highly skilled at choosing the wrong leaders and then replacing them, this is little comfort to poorer carers.
Earlier this week, the Institute for Fiscal Studies published new research into the long-term effectiveness of the Sure Start programme, set up by the Labour government in 1998 and regarded as one of its most successful policies. Sure Start linked early years, health and family support services for poor children in disadvantaged areas.
The follow-up study showed that the scheme had significantly improved the life chances of children who had been eligible for free school meals and had access to a Sure Start centre: they did three grades better at GCSE – like getting five Cs instead of two Cs and three Ds – when compared with similar poor children without access to Sure Start.
The study also showed that younger children with special educational needs were identified much sooner and their problems were identified when they were younger, thereby reducing the need for education, health and care plans later.
The Tories closed Sure Start down to save money.
If you believe the Guardian is written by the spawn of the devil, skip this paragraph because it’s just won a diversity award at the Press Awards after researching and publishing its founders’ links to the transatlantic slave trade in what the judges called “breathtakingly honest mea culpa”, adding that it was “a hugely thoughtful and comprehensive project that provides a groundbreaking example of how an organisation addresses historical links to slavery”. How many other publications would dare to be this honest?
Certainly not Liz Truss’s book (Remember her? Record-breaking prime minister?) which should have been called ‘Mea non culpa’ or ‘I was the only one in step’. I’m ashamed to admit that I almost feel sorry for somebody who is so deluded.
Truss’s credo seems to have extended into the police force. We’re being invited to elect a new police commissioner locally on the basis of their politics; there’s no mention of experience of policing or justice. How long before the police ask how you vote before deciding whether to arrest you? I’m tempted to spoil my ballot paper.
Talking of delusion, Donald Trump, former president of the most powerful country of the world, a man with whom you’d feel as safe as you would if a two-year old had a tantrum while carrying a machine gun, you remember him, orange make up, starched and dyed combover, pouty little mouth, fancies his daughter, unfaithful husband and serial groper … anyway, he’s been in court while jurors are selected for his trial on criminal charges and he keeps been falling asleep. His eyes shut, his head dropped forward and he drooled but he said he wasn’t asleep, he was thinking. When he actually was awake, his expression was a sight to see: Trump the Grump.
Dubai had 18 months’ rain in 24 hours earlier this week, which was described by a meteorologist as a “very rare rainfall event”. We’ve had quite a few rainfall events here over the last 3 months but we call them showers or storms.
In the Middle East, Israel is still trying to kill all Palestinians in Gaza and, as a side show, recently arranged to launch a rocket attack on Iran so Iran naturally had to retaliate by attacking Israel with over 100 rockets and Israel promised to get their revenge with another attack on Iran, and so on. When does revenge stop?
This is the way the world ends, not with a whimper but with a “he started it, no he started it, no he started it, no he started it … Ma, he’s throwing bombs at me.”