Trump’s and Netanyahu’s rockers, racism, and a joke

30 August 2025

As another August fades into history, the world is still divided between people who think Donald Trump is off his rocker and those who never thought he was on it in the first place.

Trump’s recent achievements include announcing that the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, could end the war with Russia “almost immediately” if he wanted to.  Of course he could:  all he has to do is agree with everything Vladimir Putin wants and the war will end as Russia secures its new borders and disenfranchises all Ukrainians.

At Trump’s meeting with Putin in Alaska, he was obviously confident when he welcomed Putin at the airport.  After the meeting, it was all too obvious that Trump hadn’t got his own way and his vanity had been punctured:  he sat slumped in his chair while Putin sat upright and inscrutable.

He also proved that surrounding oneself with unqualified sycophants is never the best idea when it was widely reported that one of his team had left confidential documents describing his brief for the meeting in a public area of an Alaskan hotel.

Billy Long, a loyal Trump supporting Republican congressman and previously an auctioneer, was appointed head of the Internal Revenue Service in June and has just been booted out.  His appointment at the time had raised eyebrows because Long’s previous experience of tax were limited to the promotion of a fraud-riddled tax credit scheme.  The next head of the IRS will be Trump’s 7th appointment so far this year.

His stunning lack of self-knowledge (and ‘political’ nous) was revealed when the Norwegian media Dagens Næringsliv reported that he had cold-called the Norwegian finance minister Jens Stoltenberg to ask for a Nobel Peace Prize.

When one remembers that Henry Kissinger was awarded a peace price in 1973, this perhaps isn’t so unlikely after all.  Kissinger was awarded the prize together with his North Vietnamese counterpart Le Duc Tho but Tho had the decency to reject it and was reported by the New York Times as saying “peace has not yet really been established in South”.

A ceasefire had been agreed in October 1972 but Kissinger then ordered a bombing raid on Hanoi in December and two members of the Nobel Committee resigned in protest at the award while a New York Times op-ed suggested it should be called the ‘Nobel War Prize’.

North and South Vietnam remained at war until North Vietnam took Saigon in April 1975 and united the country.

Nothing much has changed in the Middle East except that Benjamin Netanyahu (another rocker-free ‘leader’) has decided the best way to improve Israel’s image internationally is to target and murder the journalists reporting on what they do, even if they’re inside a hospital.  They’ve even added a subtlety of their own by killing a bunch of journalists and then hitting exactly the same target again 15 minutes after the first attack so the aid workers and surviving journalists who had arrived to help the wounded are also killed.

Despite tens of thousands of people, Jews and Arabs, joining demonstrations across the country calling on Netanyahu to cancel plans to attack Gaza City, Israel’s military is accelerating its preparations for the assault.

Critics, including relatives of hostages still in Gaza, say he is prolonging the war to extend his personal political career and further delay the courts hearing the criminal charges brought against him.

Even Trump said “I’m not happy about it”.

Numbers from a classified Israeli military intelligence database indicate that, by May this year, almost 9,000 fighters from Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad were dead or “probably dead”.  However, Israel believed they had already killed some 53,000 Palestinians, thereby admitting that almost five out of six people they’d killed were civilians.

Earlier in August, the Israel Defense Force had even “claimed responsibility” for the killing of Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif and admitted having targeted him.

(Have you noticed that bombers and other terrorists are always reported as “claiming responsibility” for such atrocities.  I once suggested to Jon Snow, then a Channel 4 News presenter, that they should say that bombers had “accepted the blame” for atrocities but he was surprisingly defensive and said that a lot of editorial thought had been given to the words used.)

All that Britain can offer is Nigel Farage who has taken advantage of other politicians taking holidays to produce headline-grabbing soundbites – lots of emotional fluff not too hampered by detail or facts.  (One journalist, possibly not a fan, pointed out that Farage grabbed headlines during the summer recess because he took his own holidays while parliament was sitting.)

His “Operation Restoring Justice” (no, me neither) proposes the deportation of “absolutely anyone” arriving in a small boat and the removal of the UK’s commitments to human rights.  He said he would leave the European Convention on Human Rights, repeal the Human Rights Act, disapply the 1951 refugee convention and the UN convention against torture as well as the Council of Europe’s anti-trafficking convention.  (His party has already promised to do away with all those rubbish policies on equality and diversity.)

The whole thing is so ludicrous I wonder if Farage would claim he’s just patriotic but I wonder when patriotism merges with racism and ill-considered beliefs in ‘racial purity’ (c.f. Hitler’s Germanic “Master Race”, which was to be achieved by murdering Jews, Russians, Roma, disabled people, and anybody who wasn’t tall and blonde – and that was just the women because Hitler himself was short and dark).

It reminds me of whoever it was who claimed they could prove that everybody was still anti-semitic.

 “Nonsense” said a friend, “I’m not anti-anybody.”

“Well, just think:  Hitler wanted to exterminate the Jews.”

“That was 90 years ago.”

“But, in Germany today, there are still Nazi groups whose aim is to kill another 6 million Jews and 47 postmen.”

“47 postmen???”

“You see, not even you care about the Jews.”

Book thefts, tax dodgers, assisted dying, odd churches, and unknown visitors

22 June 2025

I’ve been muttering away every week for about 10 years now (although they weren’t published here until mid-2018) and I’ve sent a weekly email about it to the local volunteers of the charity for which I started it. 

I will no longer be warning this hard core of readers that another bunch of my hang-ups has been published but I guess they can bookmark the site, or ‘like’ it, or Google ‘Lesser Mutterings’, or do whatever clever people do if they want to keep up with something.

This also removes my (self-imposed) weekly deadline so I can mutter when the mood takes me or when I need to vent my anger at some of life’s stupidities about things like [fill in your own words here].

So here’s a bunch of fascinating but useless information.

For example, did you know the Bible is the one book most frequently stolen from bookshops (presumably the thieves are people who haven’t read it) and one bookseller in Austin, Texas, has said “The average King James Bible with a zipper is about 35 bucks.”  I’ve got several translations of the Bible, including the King James version, and none of them has a zip.  Perhaps I should go with the flow and steal one with a zip.

Our own HMRC spends a fortune trying to catch thieves.  In 2016, they devoted the time of 2,700 staff to investigating possible tax losses but their priorities are worrying:  five times as many people were investigating benefit fraud, which cost them an estimated £1.3bn a year, as those checking tax evasion schemes which cost an estimated £35bn each year.  Tax avoidance is, of course, OK while evasion is basically fiddling the system so as to pay less tax (I over-simplify slightly …)

(Don’t you love the “estimated” losses?  It’s like saying there are 2,500 undiscovered murders in Britain every year.)

Take Amazon, for example, who seem to have structured their UK business so that, in the last reported year, it only paid £932m (including business rates, corporation tax and national insurance contributions) on UK income of £27bn.  However, we must remember that poor old Amazon has to shunt a proportion of its taxable income over to what it describes as its “loss-making” subsidiary in Luxembourg so not much profit is left in the UK for HMRC to tax.

Curiously enough, our friendly neighbour vet retired a few years ago and sold the two privately-owned practices to a subsidiary of a company also registered in Luxembourg.  This company owns almost 3,000 veterinary practices in the UK and has increased its prices by 80% in three years, including changing the crematorium to one which costs three times as much as the old one.  They refuse to answer simple questions such as whether the new crematorium is part of the same group, or even why their vets don’t know that dying dogs tend to void their bladders.  (Freedom of Information Act?  Not here, mate.)

The Assisted Dying bill has now been passed by the House of Commons and goes to the House of Lords so we humans will soon, subject to some very important controls, be granted the same powers as pet-owners to choose a comfortable death rather than suffer months of slow and painful decline.

We’ve also seen Louise Casey’s report into the influence of ethnicity in gangs of adults who groomed children for sexual exploitation.  Her conclusion was, much to the delight of racist bigots, that a disproportionate number of Asian men were among suspects in the North Midlands even though she made it clear that, at a national level, the data is incomplete and inconsistent so it’s not possible to extrapolate her findings to say that the same is true of all grooming gangs in Britain.

It seems possible that an organisation dedicated to the persecution of Asian men could be registered as a church in America where the IRS only looks at the paperwork, not at the organisation’s aims, so some people have taken the mickey by registering daft churches.  For example, you can become an ordained minister of the Church of the Latter-Day Dude online, for free.  Its beliefs are sort of based on Taoism and entirely unconnected with the film The Big Lebowski but take much the same approach to life as the Dude;  for more details, have a look at https://dudeism.com/whatisdudeism/

One of my readers recently introduced me to the political campaigning group Led by Donkeys which was formed in 2018 as an anti-Brexit movement but has since broadened its base and contrasts what politicians (of all stripes) said in the past and the exact opposite they said more recently.

You know we all find our urine smells after we’ve been eating asparagus?  Well, not all of us do.  About 6 in every 100 people can’t smell the sulphur-containing compounds in the thiol family (which are also found in skunk spray), despite most human noses being able to detect the stuff in concentrations as low as a few molecules per billion.  Even curiouser, it’s thought that about 40% of these lucky people don’t produce thiols at all.  As usual (hem hem), I’m in the majority and am always amazed by how fast my body converts the asparagus I’ve just eaten into these thiols and then releases them with other liquid waste.  (There, isn’t that phrased with a delicacy for which I’m not renowned.)

And here’s a helpful hint if you’re alone in the house and nervous:  keep something impressive by your front door, like electric hedge-clippers or a hand-saw or, even better, a chainsaw.  Then, if somebody you don’t know rings on the bell, pick it up before opening the door and let them see you holding it.  But remember, if you have a chain on the door, stand to one side of the door when opening it because a good kick will tear out the screws holding most chains and, if you’re behind the door, it’ll hit you in the face.

On that cheerful note …

Lucky Wilbury, rapists, UK prisons, genocide, Trump’s latest gaffe, Brexit and dodgy lawyers

24 May 2025

Today’s biggest news is, of course, that Lucky Wilbury (aka Bob Dylan) has made it to his 84th birthday.  Who said mind-altering drugs were bad for you?  They helped him become the greatest lyricist in the last 100 years …

Other goodish news this week (at least for us sadists) came when Shabana Mahmood, the Lord Chancellor, was reported to be considering chemical castration for the most serious sex offenders.  I know of two young women who were violently raped and suffered permanent damage and wonder if this goes far enough;  I’ve heard enough about these two people to be tempted to support the use of a pair of blunt bolt-cutters.

They’re also considering releasing and tagging killers and rapists half-way through their sentences.  Surely these are exactly the wrong people to release.  Shouldn’t they be releasing (and tagging?) non-violent offenders to release overcrowding in prisons and perhaps never giving first offenders custodial sentences if their crimes didn’t involve violence against people?

Talking of criminals inevitably makes me think of Benjamin Netanyahu who is committing war crimes in the name of Zionism and then accusing his critics of being anti-Semitic.  I don’t know enough about him to know if he actually is that stupid or if he’s intentionally manipulating the truth because he wants people to think he’s slaughtering Palestinians in the name of a religion rather than for political reasons.

Gary Lineker has been fired by the BBC after re-posting a pro-Palestinian video criticising Zionism on social media .  Unfortunately, it included a picture of a rat which was, apparently, used by the Nazis to associate Jews with vermin.  Lineker later apologised and said he would “never knowingly share anything antisemitic” and he’d deleted the post “as soon as I became aware of the issue”.

Still, it’ll save the BBC a fortune because they grossly overpaid him.

Even the UK is taking a stand and the Foreign Secretary David Lammy has suspended negotiations over a free-trade deal saying calls from some of Israel’s cabinet ministers to “purify Gaza” by expelling Palestinians were abhorrent, and he condemned their refusal to allow thousands of aid deliveries to reach starving Palestinians.

Israeli troops fired what they called “warning shots” at an international group of diplomats from 31 countries who had been invited by the Palestinian Authority to see what was happening in Gaza.  Israel’s explanation was that the group had deviated from the route they’d tried to impose on the delegation in a country which they’d invaded where they have no legal rights to impose a tax on bread.

The leader of the Israeli opposition has said Israel “kills babies as a hobby” and even Ehud Olmert, a former prime minister of Israel, has said what Israel “is doing now in Gaza is very close to a war crime”.  “Very close”? What haven’t they told him?

Netanyahu’s apparent lack of intelligent reasoning seems rather like Donald Trump’s more stupid outbursts which last week included accusing South Africa’s president Cyril Ramaphosa of “white genocide” which Trump ‘proved’ to his complete satisfaction with pictures taken in the Democratic Republic of Congo.  Ramaphosa himself remained dignified and stood up to Trump by drawing attention to his apparent attachment to far-right conspiracy theories.

Trump could, I suppose, have responded by saying that one of his latest ploys has been to suggest that women with more than five children should be awarded a National Medal of Motherhood in attempt to increase the population.  Doesn’t this sound like something Mao Zedung would have done if he hadn’t been encouraging people to kill flies though I don’t think even Trump would believe Mao was on the far-right so his at least his delusions are balanced.

Over here, my Conservative friend is trying to convince me that, because Brits voted for Brexit, it’s undemocratic for Keir Starmer to be negotiating with the EU to remove some of its daftest consequences.  However, he refuses to accept that an even greater majority of Brits elected Starmer’s party, which empowers the prime minister to reduce some of the inconveniences such as queuing with other ‘aliens’ to enter an EU country, and allowing EU citizens to be given visas and permits to work in the UK, a right that already exists for young Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders and South Koreans.

In a different arena, another friend recently discovered the unfairness and misleading claims of ‘no-win, no-fee’ lawyers.  They had a perfectly good case against their landlords (a housing association, also registered as a charity, with assets of almost £1bn!) who took 5 years to act on reports of damaged window frames.

Unfortunately, one of these firms managed to convince them they could get compensation from the landlords so they drew up a case which went to Court on the day before the Easter weekend when people wanted to rush things and get home early.  I accompanied her as a McKenzie friend and discovered that the solicitors, who are based in Liverpool, had instructed a barrister from Cardiff (well, Cardiff, Exeter, they’re all south of Crewe aren’t they) to represent her in court.

I know some KCs and this one didn’t impress me nearly as much as he impressed himself. He didn’t discuss either the case or what sort of compensation they would accept with my friend, instead talking about his personal life and showing us pictures of his house.  He also ignored a specific instruction that costs were to be in addition to compensation (since he didn’t know what the costs would be) but, after some to-ing and fro-ing with the other side, he announced that he’d agreed a settlement out of court, without saying what it was.

This turned out to be a lump sum which included costs totalling more than 80% of the total so the actual compensation was derisory and, so far, the lawyers have ignored the Court’s instruction that payment should be made within 21 days and my friend has so far received nothing.

I’m now trying to help my friend put this right but the main lesson I’ve learned is never to use no-win no-fee lawyers because at least some of them don’t know what’s written on their tin.

Space flights, quotations, trans people, death row and car parks

19 April 2025

The really big news this week is that Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin spaceflight programme launched one of their phallic-symbol pods ‘manned’ entirely by ‘chicks’ into space for 11 minutes so they could patronise show the world how enlightened they are.  Blue Origin is, of course, targeted at the tourism industry rather than any serious exploration of spacei.

Wouldn’t it be better if space programmes were crewed by the people who could contribute most to scientific research regardless of what gender was assigned to them at birth (which is known to be an arbitrary judgement in some cases)?  Sadly, as Bob Dylan said “I don’t think it’s liable to happen / Like the sound of one hand clappin’.”

Donald Trump has of course banned diversity, equity and inclusion programs so they can happily exclude females, with or without penises, in future unless the PR justifies it.

Bezos’s Amazon gave $1m to Trump’s 2024 election campaign and Bezos himself stopped the Washington Post publishing an editorial supporting Kamala Harris.  By a complete coincidence, Trump’s gang has just awarded a $2bn contract to Blue Origin. 

(I’ve a friend who, as far as I know, doesn’t have any particular problems with his own penis but gets tremendously agitated about where trans women should be allowed to ‘wash’ if they haven’t undergone a full physical transformation;  I can only think this is because he thinks he’s a traditional man who knows how to protect chicks better than they do themselves.)

The same friend also seems to think that I must support Labour because he’s sussed I’m not a great fan of Trump or Elon Musk – why does my computer keep printing Muck when I’m trying to write Musk? – or any of the 22 Conservative leaders we’ve had in the last few years (fact checkers should note that I have guessed how many leaders the Tories have consumed in the last 35 years and 22 might be wrong).

In fact, I think Labour’s proposal to reduce benefits is stupid and their decision to take the gender assigned at birth as definitive reminded me of the old saw “For every complex problem, there’s a simple solution, and it’s wrong”.

Last week, I also came across a quotation from the 20th century economist Walter E Williams who said “Most of the great problems we face are caused by politicians creating solutions to problems they created in the first place.”

More interesting reading is likely to be found in Corinna Lain’s book Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection, which is to be published on 22 April.  She describes her motive in writing this as “I was trying to figure out why states are so breathtakingly bad at a procedure that we use on cats and dogs every day”, something I’ve often wondered.

Her answer is that a significant factor is who performs the executions and she offers Missouri’s chief executioner from 1995-2006, Dr Alan Doerhoff, who was responsible for 54 of the state’s 65 executions, as an example;  he has since boasted that “Nobody will ever do as many [executions] as I have.”  There are a lot of words that describe such people, most of them ending in ‘pathy’.

Prisoners on death row were allowed to employ lawyers to carry out a (limited) inquiry into Doerhoff’s experience and, under oath, the executioner testified that that he had problems mixing the drugs “so right now we’re still improvising”.  He also said that he “sometimes transpose[d] numbers” and that he was dyslexic (he later denied this saying he just sometimes just got numbers muddled).

In Arizona, one of the ‘IV team executioners’ had once been a nurse but their licence was suspended after they’d been arrested multiple times for Driving Under the Influence while impaired by alcohol or other drugs.  In one 10-day period in 2007, they were arrested three times in Arizona.

Another member of the team had no medical licence and also had a record of DUI as well as bouncing a cheque. Their only relevant experience was once serving in a military medical corps (although they hadn’t actually inserted an IV for 15 years).

Aren’t these people on the wrong end of the needle? 

As at 1 January 2024, 2,241 people were on death row in America;  58% of them are not classified as ‘white’. 

Not all states use injections for executions so perhaps frustrated British shooters who are being stopped from killing wildlife on peatlands over here would like to satisfy their urge to kill by applying for these jobs?

For some reason, this brings to mind a recent article in Which? magazine on the different types of parking tickets issued in the UK.  This was all new to me and I can do no better than quote from their article:

“Most parking tickets will be one of these three:

Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) or Excess Charge Notice (ECN) – usually issued by the council on public land, such as a high street or council car park.

Parking Charge Notice – issued by a landowner or parking company on private land, such as a supermarket car park.

Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN) – issued by the police on red routes, white zig zags or where the police manage parking.”

They are enforced in different ways and the private parking companies have the empathetic public-spiritedness of Hitler’s Waffen SS.  Even when they allow people 20 minutes free parking, if you spend 10 minutes there, then spend 9 minutes finding a working payment machine and queuing behind people trying to get it to work, then take 2 minutes getting back to your car and leaving the car park, tough.  Leave it and £1.90 goes up exponentially – the highest I’ve heard of so far is £180. 

Which? also offers advice on dealing with usurious increases, but there are no guarantees of success.

Good news about bookie lookalikes, U-turns, intelligent millionaires and climate action

12 April 2025

Lots of cheering news this week, including that wonderful picture of Donald Trump holding up his tariff board and looking exactly like a bookie on the hill at Epsom on Derby Day.

Amy Coney Barrett, a Republican member of the American Supreme Court has, for the second time in recent months, voted against her Republican colleagues in a ruling against Trump to put justice before politics.  Who’d have guessed she still had the integrity to do that.

Trump did a Liz Truss by imposing a 10% levy on imports from Ukraine and the UK, and 20% on imports from the EU (and 0% on imports from Russia), financial markets worldwide crashed and he was forced into a humiliating U-turn, which just goes to show that if you say “Boo!” to a bully, they’ll chicken out.

Jaguar Land Rover had immediately suspended all further exports of their cars to America, thereby boosting the owners of ones already over there by increasing their second-hand values.

Trump’s tariffs also provided a wonderful excuse for our Labour government to rethink its economic policy and Keir Starmer has said “old assumptions should be discarded” so they can forget their crazy undertaking not to raise taxes.

All over America, there were demonstrations against Trump’s “authoritarian overreach and billionaire-backed agenda” with an estimated 500,000 people taking to the streets in Washington, Florida and about 1,000 other places, including state capitals.

There have even been rumours that Elon Musk will be leaving the Department of Government Efficiency, possibly because people have sussed that he thinks cutting expenditure must automatically improve efficiency.

Both Trump and Musk were started in business with inherited capital but, while Musk has increased his with some successful businesses, Trump has lost a large amount of his inheritance with his unbelievable incompetence in running businesses – remember his casinos were bankrupted, beating the odds that were stacked in his favour by the rules of the games.

Another millionaire who inherited wealth is Abigail Disney, one of my heroes, who has acknowledged she is rich “only because of some quirks in the tax system, some good luck, and some very loving grandparents. But nothing else.”  She has for many years been giving large sums of money away and a member of The Patriotic Millionaires, an American organisation dedicated to changing the system so that its members and others with even more money pay more tax.

Last year, she wrote that “Extreme wealth concentration in the hands of a few oligarchs is a threat to democracy the world over.”  She accepts that instituting a global minimum tax on the very rich will be complex, but not impossible, and she pointed out that, four years ago, 136 OECD countries “joined an accord to enact a 15% global minimum tax on multinational corporations”.  She added that “If we can institute a tax floor for the world’s largest corporations, there is no reason we can’t do the same for the world’s wealthiest individuals”, pointing out that a 2023 survey found that even millionaires in G20 countries support the idea.

More good news over here is that the planning application for a deep coalmine in Whitehaven, Cumbria has been withdrawn after the High Court ruled that the permission granted by Michael Gove when he was in charge was unlawful.  This follows another, earlier decision by the Supreme Court that quashed planning permission for an oil well at Horse Hill in Surrey on the grounds that the impact of burning coal, oil and gas must be included when the climate impact of a proposal must be included.

The Labour government is also proposing to extend restrictions on the burning of peatland which has led to the degradation of 80% of them in England.  They are comparatively uncommon but, when they’re allowed to remain undisturbed, they store huge amounts of carbon – an estimated 3.2 billion tonnes in the UK alone.  The Conservative government started with a small step in the right direction by limiting the burning to areas of ‘deep peat’ (over 40cm deep) in Sites of Special Scientific Interest in conservation areas and some even smaller sites.

Labour’s plans include reducing the definition of deep peat from 40cm to 30cm and would do away with the limitation to conservation areas, increasing protected areas by two thirds to a total of 368,000 hectares, but this still leaves almost half the total area unprotected. 

Needless to say, organisations like the Countryside Alliance are up in arms.  They don’t care about the wildlife, such as adders, toads, and ground-nesting birds, that are killed when land is burnt but they’re horrified that this will restrict the land where otherwise relatively normal people pay a lot of money for the sheer delight of blowing the heads off the grouse that live there bringing up their families.

I have no real problem with somebody shooting something to take home to eat (actually, of course, picking up and eating roadkill avoids the slaughter and is much cheaper, but remember fresh blood is good, maggots aren’t) but shooters don’t even get to keep the birds they killed without paying for them;  and what worries me more is the thought that some people actually get pleasure from killing, and are willing to pay to be allowed to do it.

Still on the subject of corpses, I’m always fascinated by the facial reconstructions of Neanderthals and other people who have been for tens of thousands of years just from a skull that’s been dug up by an archaeologist.  I know pictures are sometimes drawn using similar techniques in attempts to picture the faces of bodies that haven’t yet been identified but I wonder whether any research has been done reconstructing the faces from the skulls of people who’ve died more recently, and of whom there are photographs, to see how accurate they are? 

They’re welcome to use my skull for a test when I’ve finished with it because I find it hard to imagine how they could guess where my wrinkles are from the underlying bone so it would be an interesting test of their system.