More ‘magic’, billions, water companies, justice and immigration

17 May 2025

After last week’s mutterings, a friend suggested migration could be added to the list of currently inexplicable things, which made me realise I’d inadvertently been anthropocentric and ignored insects, birds, fish and mammals that migrate for thousands of miles.

The best known is probably the arctic tern which commutes some 15,000 miles between summers in Shetland and summers in Antarctica but they have the ability to sleep while flying, closing down half their brain while the other half keeps the wings moving. 

Perhaps more impressive is the monarch butterfly which migrates annually between North America and Mexico and, though less well-known, the painted lady butterfly which travels between Africa and Northern Europe.  How do they do it?  It’s been suggested that they use the earth’s magnetic field to control their journeys but this is constantly changing as the magnetic poles move so they have to allow for the effect of the deviation if they want to get to the right place.

However, what I find most impressive is the fact that monarch butterflies don’t live very long and each migration is undertaken by newly-hatched butterflies that have never done it before so the route, and the allowance for magnetic pole movements, must somehow be genetically imprinted in their brains.

What will they do when the magnetic poles swap positions, which the alignment of magnetic particles in ancient rocks has shown they do?  It’s thought the swap doesn’t happen overnight and takes a very long time so perhaps the poles just drift away from the geographical poles until they reach the other end of the earth and the North Star becomes the South Star while the Southern Cross becomes the Northern Cross.  And, of course, half-way they’ll be the Eastern Star and the Western Cross, or possibly vice versa.

Many readers may remember my continuing problem with envisaging large numbers, like anything over 10.  Well, I’ve come across another example of just how impossible it is to grasp large numbers and the differences between them.  To help me picture the difference between a million and a billion, I was told to think in seconds:  one million seconds is about 12 days while one billion seconds is about 32 years.

Aaarrrggghhh!

I hope the people with more billions in the bank than they can ever spend will, if governments are too frightened to make them pay more tax, give it away to those people and countries whose need is so much greater.  I also hope that the wind is changing.  Last week, 40% of Centrica’s shareholders voted against the board’s recommended pay plans.  Chris O’Shea, the group’s chief executive trousered £4.3m last year and, yes, he took almost twice as much the previous year but the energy crisis encouraged them to impose huge increases on their customers’ energy bills, taking many of them even further into debt, while O’Shea (and other senior managers) get away with daylight robbery.

Thames Water (the one on the verge of bankruptcy) has a new CEO, Chris Weston, who took a £195,000 bonus after only three months in post and was asked by the Defra Select Committee to justify this.  “Because I’m worth it” he replied.  Can anybody can think of any sensible justification for saying this?

The government is now planning to block the payment of huge staff bonuses from a £3bn emergency loan to Thames Water, which claims these bonuses are vital to retaining its management and that they are its most valuable asset.  Whaaat?  Aren’t these the same managers that screwed everything up in the first place and led to the company being fined millions of pounds?

Down here, South West Water is owned by the Pennon Group and has increased our bill by 30% for the next year while chief executive Susan Davy generously waived her right to bonuses in the two years to March 2024 leaving her with a paltry £860,000 in the latter year (including the deferred reinvestment of shares).  My heart fails to bleed for her.

There’s also something wrong with our justice system when a peaceful Stop Oil protestor is sent to prison for 4 years and a violent child rapist gets 18 months.

And Peter Sullivan, 68, has spent the last 38 years in prison for a murder that forensic evidence has now decided he didn’t commit.

Another interesting comment came my way this week, something I hadn’t heard before, that the late Archbishop Desmond Tutu once said, “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”

So which side should I take on Labour’s latest plans to curb immigration?  Keir Starmer this week spoke of a need to end the “squalid experiment in open borders” in what cynics might describe as an attempt to win Reform voters.  What self-respecting Respect member would be willing to support Labour?  It’s believed Nigel Farage celebrated Starmer’s comments with a bevvy and a fag.

Others saw a connection between Starmer’s view and the ‘rivers of blood’ speech given by the Conservative racist Enoch Powell in 1968.

Next week, all state benefits will be scrapped to encourage recipients to get on their bikes and find work (thank you Norman Tebbit, another ancient Conservative politician, for that suggestion) and the Isle of Wight will be declared an independent territory with 0% taxes through which all UK ‘earnings’ over £250,000 can be channelled tax-free.

And an old story to cheer people up.  The King of Sweden once visited Sir Paul Nurse, a Nobel Prize winner who holds 50 honorary degrees and is former President of the Royal Society and Chief Executive and Director of the Francis Crick Institute.  On the royal arrival, the receptionist rang Nurse’s office and said “Gentleman here, he’s … er … watcher say yer king of, mate?”

Censored media, George Clooney, Tom Lehrer, Donald Trump and Hargreaves Lansdown

29 March 2025

Last year, for the first time, neither the Washington Post nor the LA Times published an editorial supporting one of the candidates in the presidential elections.  The break with tradition was caused by their billionaire owners, Jeff Bezos and Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong respectively, who instructed their teams to abandon the editorial independence they’d demonstrated for many elections by not publishing an editorial endorsement of the one of the candidates.  Even after the election, the latter asked the newspaper’s editorial board in December to “take a break” from writing about Donald Trump.

This seems very unfair to those of us who want to hear independent views which are untainted by the prejudices of plutocrat owners.  It’s even less fair to those who read and watch only reports that support their own prejudices and then believe everything they’re told by them (yes, fans of [redacted], I’m talking about you).

In the UK, all the national newspapers except the Guardian are owned by very rich individuals or groups of investors such as hedge funds and, apart from the BBC, the major radio and TV broadcasters are similarly controlled.  The BBC built its reputation for impartiality over the decades and gained worldwide respect through its BBC World Service (introduced in 1932) and a survey in September 2024 showed that two out of three viewers still rely on BBC One for news reports.

But the BBC’s share of the market is falling as the world political scene is drifting to the far right and people are now seeking less balanced media that tell them what they want to hear.

This is encouraged by the shameless agendas of people with axes to grind and a lot of money or political clout, who influence their media for their own purposes.  I wonder if, taking a completely random example, Bezos wouldn’t have spiked a pre-election editorial on the presidential candidates if he thought it was going to say how wonderful a president Donald Trump would be this time?

The actor and Democrat activist George Clooney said recently in an interview on the US TV news programme 60 Minutes that the battle between the press and the government is a “fight for the ages” and referred to both the Washington Post and the LA Times.

Trump, as thin-skinned as ever, immediately responded by Tweeting (Xing?) that Clooney is a “fake movie actor” who “never came close to making a great movie”.  Trump obviously hasn’t seen “O Brother, Where Art Thou?” but he probably disapproves of the Coen Brothers anyway.

“What does Clooney know about anything?” the fake TV ‘personality’ continued. “Clooney should get out of politics and go back to television.  Movies never really worked for him!!!”

In the 1950s, Tom Lehrer was a maths teacher at various American colleges, including Harvard, who interrupted the day job to write and perform satirical songs such as “I Got It From Agnes”, “The Old Dope Peddler” and “Poisoning Pigeons in the Park”.

His musical career was comparatively brief and he’s been quoted as saying he went back to maths because “Political satire became obsolete when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel peace prize.”  His songs remain acute (and very funny) in a world where the American President unwittingly parodies himself every time he opens his mouth.

Trump’s latest blunder is to excuse his administration’s embarrassing security breach after a journalist from Atlantic magazine was accidentally invited to a Signal meeting discussing specific operational details of plans to bomb Yemen, including details of US bombings, drone launches, targeting information of the assault, timings for the attack, descriptions of weather conditions and the specific weapons to be used to kill a “target terrorist”.

When questioned about the leak, Trump said: “It wasn’t classified information,” and it was “the only glitch in two months” both of which claims were palpably incorrect.

In just two months, Trump has already antagonised the only two countries that share land borders with America.  One curious result of this is that Canadians now need a passport to visit a library which was deliberately built to straddle the border between Stanstead, Quebec, and Derby Line, Vermont, as a symbol of cooperation and friendship between the two countries.  However, the entrance is in Vermont so Canadian readers have to take ID to walk down the side of the building into America to reach the door.  It’s a library for heavens’ sakes.  (“Anything to declare?” / “Just a book, look, Das Kapital.” / “Up against the wall, Canuck.”)

(In the south, rumour has it that groups of Mexicans have been chanting “tear down the wall”, and Roger Waters will be doing a gig in Juarez before leading a conga dance across the bridge into El Paso.)

Trump’s latest economic triumphs include the imposition of tariffs rising to 25% on imported cars and a trade war with China. 

What a good job he’s got Elon Musk’s social graces to help smooth his way forward.

Over here, research by the financial services company Hargreaves Lansdown (which obviously has a vested interest in the results) has shown that people should increase their ‘rainy day funds’ to cover three to six months’ essential expenditure as April price increases hit them, and said six months’ emergency savings should average £12,669.

What sort of world does Hargreaves Lansdown live in?  How many of us have this much set aside to cover price increases, household emergencies etc?  Have people on state benefits got any savings or have they already spent it on food?  I know a single parent with two small children who can’t even manage on universal credit and child allowances, and probably doesn’t even know what savings are.  This is just one family who I happen to know;  how many hundreds of thousands of other families I don’t know are similarly over-stretched?

(Remember Hargreaves Lansdown?  They pushed Neil Woodford’s funds at investors until his luck ran out and then they suddenly went completely silent – no apologies or anything.  More than 8,000 people whose money was lost by Woodford are now backing a legal claim against Hargreaves Lansdown which could total £200m.)

Dentists, evolution, forthcoming wars, Mars and sex

18 January 2025

Having expensive teeth, I was attracted by a Google ad offering ‘seniors’ cheap dental treatment so, rather than clicking on the link, I googled Nation.com whose website includes a Union Jack (why does this make me wary?) (though not as much as the St George’s flag). 

Its mission is “Nation.com puts in the work to find the most specialized and trustworthy sources for the information you need. We then vet and gather information, then share it in a digestible manner.”

Anyway, under the heading “How to Access NHS Dental Care”, it says “Accessing NHS dental care involves a few straightforward steps … The NHS website also provides a search tool to locate nearby NHS dental practices.”

Isn’t that great!  The only thing that doesn’t appear anywhere in the guidance is how to find an NHS dentist with vacancies; rumour has it that there are no such dentists anywhere in our entire county.

They’re a bit like skyhooks:  really useful.  The only trouble is finding one.

I reckon my grasp of the English language isn’t too bad but I recently came across a sentence comprising three words and I had to look up two of them.  Try it:  “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”.  ‘Ontogeny’ refers to the development of an individual from fertilisation while ‘phylogeny’ refers to the development of a species.

This was originally proposed by Ernst Haeckel in the 19th century but has since been discredited by what appears to be a belief that the development of individuals and species is more complicated than that.  The origin and evolution of species might have turned out rather differently if Haeckel had been right.

But perhaps evolution is too limiting a word.  With people like Donald Trump thundering over the horizon, perhaps the word ‘devolution’ is an alternative in some individuals.

Trump’s already added Canada and the Panama Canal to his list of takeover targets but I wonder if he’s realised that if he also takes over Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica, his troops could have a clear run through to Panama to protect America’s right of passage (geddit?) along the canal which he thinks is controlled by China. 

In fact, although Hong Kong has stakes in a couple of ports, ships using the canal are charged fees based on the ships’ weight and size regardless of nationality even though Trump said last month that, if Panama cannot ensure “the secure, efficient and reliable operation [of the canal] we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question”.  Once again, he refused to rule out taking economic or military action.

The history of the canal and the Canal Zone, which included a strip of land on each side of the canal itself, is certainly complicated but The Panama Canal Treaty and Neutrality Treaty, signed by America (and others) in 1977, transferred American control of the canal to Panama on 31 December 1999. 

Other uncertainties about Trump’s forthcoming reign will include the durability of an Israel / Hamas ceasefire, how long Elon Musk will continue to support him, whether he can maintain the economic improvements achieved during Joe Biden’s term and whether he’ll finally understand the ever-increasing impact of the climate crisis (about which he is in denial).  Perhaps somebody will explain to him in short, simple words why ice is melting in Greenland, exposing valuable mineral sources, and why traffic through the Panama Canal is being restricted because severe drought in Panama has reduced the volume of water kept in lakes to top-up the canal.

A report issued by America’s Justice Department last week quotes the special counsel who investigated him as saying that Trump would have been convicted of crimes over his failed attempt to cling to power in 2020 if he hadn’t won the presidential election in November because the department’s policy prohibits the prosecution of a sitting president;  which makes ‘Justice Department’ sound like an oxymoron.

Do you think he’d be immune from prosecution if he drove a Humvee at speed into a large crowd of Muslims kneeling at evening prayer?  Geneva Convention – pah! It doesn’t work in the West Bank where an ambulance stopped at the Balata Palestinian refugee camp in Nablus and five heavily-armed Israel troops got out and did some target practice on people, including an 80-year old woman who’d frightened them. 

Musk of course is a creative thinker with lots of ideas, some brighter than others, and more money than he can use (money is no use if it’s taken out of circulation and locked up in banks and long-term assets like yachts and islands). 

He’s still aiming to colonise Mars and has said that he’ll be launching the first Mars ‘Starships’ “when the next Earth-Mars transfer window opens” in two years’ time , despite Thursday’s launch failure when they managed to recapture the booster but the rocket engines failed one by one and it exploded.  This was shortly after Jeff Bezos’s rocket New Glenn got a satellite successfully into space but its booster was lost.  Why don’t the two of them cooperate? 

I wonder if Musk will be the first man to set foot on Mars or if he’ll be too busy in 2028 campaigning to be America’s next president.

More cheeringly, or not, depending on your age, is that research has linked continuing sexual activity, including straight, LGBT+++, and self-service, into old age (which was defined as anything over 50 – I refrain from guessing the age of the researchers who chose this definition) seems to help delay the onset of dementia.  It also helps lower blood pressure, reduce the risk of prostate cancer in men and can help people keep looking younger, as well as maintaining cognitive activity and verbal fluency. 

So, if you have sex once a week, you’ll be better at remembering what to buy for supper when you’re shopping;  and, presumably, if you have sex twice a week, you’ll be able to remember if you ate it.

Texan lunacy

5 September 2021

Sometimes I just can’t believe the viciousness and stupidity of mankind (with the emphasis on ‘man’), some of which make the Taliban look like Mother Theresa.

This week, it was the US Supreme Court’s chickening out (by 5 votes to 4) of blocking a new Texas state law that bans almost all abortions in defiance of the federal law established by Roe v Wade in 1973, when the Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution protects a pregnant woman’s right to have an abortion.

Texas isn’t a nice state at the best of times – in June, the creeps in charge there passed a law that, from last Wednesday, allows anyone to carry a handgun without a permit or training – and they have just passed a law which does not allow state officials to interfere (so it doesn’t directly defy the Constitution) but instead offers a $10,000 reward to anybody who snitches on people who carry out abortions, or any woman who is more than 6 weeks pregnant and planning an abortion, or anybody else encouraging or supporting or helping her in any way, like telling her which way to turn at the crossroads.

The 6 weeks is apparently to be measured from their last period despite many women not even knowing they’re pregnant at six weeks, especially if their periods are irregular.  So a woman who has been made pregnant by a rapist must live with the rapist’s child growing inside her for another 7½ months.  I wonder what this will do to suicide rates amongst pregnant women in Texas.

Apart from making large numbers of Texan health workers unemployed, it is also likely to lead to new and remunerative opportunities for bounty hunters (who started seeing if they could trick clinics into breaking the new law within hours of its introduction).

In the second largest state in the ‘United’ States, the new law will most seriously affect those who can’t cross the border into a neighbouring state (from San Antonio, the nearest neighbouring state is about 400 miles away), which means that its impact will most seriously affect poorer and disadvantaged women, many of whom will be women of colour.

But what I find most horrific is that the majority of people who voted for this law were men, and men will have been between 50% and 100% responsible for the unwanted pregnancy in the first place.  Suppose a majority of women passed a law requiring rapists and other male sexual predators to have their penises surgically removed and for $10,000 rewards to be given to people reporting offenders.

What the Great Brains of Texas have failed to realise is the dangers of the precedent they have set by not being clever enough to think the implications through.

The ‘justification’ for the 6-week limit is that the heartbeat of a foetus can first detected about then, so the foetus is deemed to be ‘alive’ after that and an abortion would therefore be equivalent to murder. 

This arbitrary judgement leads to some worrying conclusions.  I’ve mentioned before the uncertainties about when somebody can be said to be dead but the Texan legislators have cut through all the scientific uncertainties to decide that having a heartbeat means you’re alive.  Which means that if somebody’s heart stops for any reason, they’re dead, there’s no point in resuscitation and you can cut bits out of them for recycling while they’re still warm. 

Even the President of America (himself a Catholic) has accused the Texan court of assaulting vital constitutional rights and ordered the federal government to ensure women in Texas still have the right to abortions.

I wonder if Mexico might be interested in taking over Texas (which would also, of course, solve the problem of Donald Trump’s ‘wall’ which is (a) incomplete and (b) collapses in strong winds and (c) can be scaled with a ladder just longer than the ‘wall’ is high)?