Jewish compassion, banks, eco-systems and privatisation

31 May 2025

The tragedies in Gaza have moved Rabbi Jonathan Wittenberg, a leading authority on Judaism who feels the people of Israel are “like an extended family”, to write an impassioned article about Gaza.  Their people, he says are “caught between the contemptuous nihilism of Hamas and Israel’s attacks” and that Israel’s blockade, threatening many thousands of people with starvation, “runs counter to Judaism’s values of justice and compassion. It contradicts what we have painfully learned from our long history as victims of persecution, pogroms and mass murder:  that, despite the hatred to which we have been and often still are subject … we must endeavour not to treat innocent others as we have been treated.”

Shalom Aleichem, Rabbi Wittenberg.

Which? magazine has recently drawn attention to the closure of two thirds of the country’s bank branches since 2015.  The banks claim that they’re no longer needed as more people rely on online and mobile banking but the Financial Conduct Authority found that three million people in the UK continue to rely on money.  As a result of these closures, if I want to pay cash into my account, I have to drive 10 miles to the nearest branch, pay for parking, and then walk to the nearest branch to do this.  How do people with disabilities cope?

Another banking wheeze that seems to have been given little publicity is that the security given by ‘chip and PIN’ cards has largely disappeared.  Beg, borrow or steal somebody else’s card and you can spend up to £100 just by swiping the card without needing a PIN, and you can continue to do this in different places until either the card’s credit limit is reached or the owner realises it’s missing and cancels it. 

Other triumphs of the banking sector include Fred ‘The Shred’ Goodwin, the disgraced former boss of the Royal Bank of Scotland who was forced to surrender half his pension payments and had his knighthood stripped from him after he’d run up record-breaking losses and allegedly shredded a whole heap of incriminating paperwork.  The ‘wealth manager’ Quilter estimates that Goodwin’s now having to scrape by on an annual pension of just £598,000, poor old sod, how he suffers for his sins.

In March 2023, while he was trying to convince people that, this time, he’d make a good president, Donald Trump said of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that “There’s a very easy negotiation to take place. But I don’t want to tell you what it is because then I can’t use that negotiation.”  In May that year, he added that he’d stop the war in Ukraine “in 24 hours” if he was elected.

Well, he was elected and more than four months after he took over, Trump still has to prove this while Vladimir Putin is trying to establish what he calls “a buffer zone” by invading Ukraine’s north-east Sumy border region.  If Putin wants a buffer zone, why doesn’t he create it in his own country?

Meanwhile, the Financial Times writer Robert Armstrong has created an acronym to describe Trump’s policies – TACO, from ‘Trump Always Chickens Out’.  Particularly apposite when you look at his repeated U-turns on import tariffs.  I wonder if his brain’s big enough to grasp the information he’s been given about the climate crisis rather than encouraging companies to “drill, baby, drill” and actually accelerate the collapse? 

One of its symptoms is the increase in the number of endangered species, even those we’ve taken for granted all our lives.  We haven’t seen swifts, swallows or martins here for many years although a few swallows have nested a couple of miles away in the town by the river;  however we do have greenfinches, which are supposed to be getting rarer, but nobody’s told ours who are aggressive little buggers and control other species’ access to the birdfeeder.

Now the Labour government has withdrawn a provision in the planning bill to require housebuilders to fit at least one hollow ‘swift brick’, which provides nesting space for swifts, house martins and other birds to help boost their declining numbers.  Well, it would have cost housebuilders about £35 per house and we couldn’t expect them to pay that, could we?

Other companies just poison wildlife (and humans) by pouring untreated sewage into our waterways but at least Thames Water, the UK’s largest water company, has been fined £123m by Ofwat with a condition that it’s to be paid by the company and its investors, not by customers.  This total includes an £18.2m fine for continuing to pay dividends even though they’d failed to meet the required minimum financial and environmental standards.

Thames Water’s response was, naturally, to plead to be let off the fine because the management that had run the company to the brink of bankruptcy and renationalisation where it is now poised thought it would make it harder for the company to find a buyer.  Did the directors admit their guilt, return the money paid to them and resign en masse?  Is the Pope a Muslim?

Scotland is currently debating a bill that would criminalise environmental offences classed as “ecocide” and allow company directors who caused severe or reckless danger to be imprisoned.

In New York, there was an explosion on board a barge carrying raw sewage to the works where it is treated.  One worker died and one was injured and the clean-up afterwards can only be imagined.  It calls to mind a popular saying involving fans …

Better news comes with the White House’s official confirmation that Elon Musk will be leaving Donald Trump’s ‘cabinet’ and the Department of Government Efficiency.

If we had a DOGE over here, so many services have now been privatised and made their buyers’ fortunes while they bankrupted their companies that there’d be nobody left to run them if they were renationalised.  Ideologically justifiable, privatisation has (broad generalisation coming up) proved unworkable in practice.  Remember even Maggie Thatcher thought privatising the railways was a step too far.

Wars, dictators, the dangers of spaceflight, pensions and assisted dying

22 March 2025

Is the news getting worse or is it just me?

For example:  we’ve learnt that a terrorist, or anybody living under the flight paths, can close London’s largest airport by burning down one electrical substation.

Israel has broken the ceasefire and started killing Gazans again followed by a court agreeing that, “due to the renewal of the war”, Benjamin Netanyahu’s criminal trial for corruption, which could land him in prison, should be postponed.  I wonder if he thinks it’s better to start killing women and children again than risking going to jail.

In Ukraine, civilians are also still dying while hopes of an amicable settlement, never high, are receding.  Valdimir Putin has “demanded” that Ukraine demilitarises (Demanded?  He’s supposed to be negotiating, not bullying), while allied European leaders are deciding how best to support Ukrainian forces.

What Ukraine remembers is that, in 1994, it had the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world and relinquished all nuclear warheads as part of a move towards complete nuclear disarmament.  In exchange, it received security guarantees of its safety from America, UK and Russia.

When Donald Trump was elected, he had boasted he could bring peace to Ukraine in 24 hours but, amazingly, he’s failed to do this.  (I wonder if Trump’s a Russian mole?)

Just look what Trump is doing to his own country.  The biggest single worry is his obvious commitment to destroying the rule of law.  He only appoints people to the highest court in the land if they’ve had their noses stuck up his backside so he can tell them to overrule anything he doesn’t like.  Anywhere else, he’d be a dictator and, if the country had valuable mineral resources, America would be invading it to remove him from power.

He’s even targeting law firms which have done work he doesn’t like by threatening to suspend security clearances of their attorneys and terminating contracts the firms already have.

Trouble is, his Tweedledum and Tweedledee act with Elon Musk leaves the two of them bolstering each other’s judgement, beauty and business incompetence.  Musk has ‘done a Gerald Ratner’ in sucking up to Trump, causing Tesla’s shares to fall by 50% in three months.  He’s even been reduced to pleading with his employees not to sell their shares.

(If you own a Tesla, you can apparently now get stickers saying “I bought this before Musk went into politics”.)

Tesla has been missing its sales targets, still hasn’t produced the autonomous vehicles it promised a decade ago and is now facing increasing competition:  the Chinese manufacturer BYD will soon be selling electric cars that will take only slightly more time to recharge than a ‘regular’ car takes to fill with fuel.

Still, the collapse of Tesla’s share price made a lot of money for hedge-fund managers who had been busy short-selling Tesla;  the Financial Times estimated they made $16.2bn from the collapse.

Musk has even beaten his own record with X / Twitter which one academic has described as the worst-performing business in history (outside wartime) and, earlier this month, SpaceX’s latest Starship launch ended with a loud bang a few minutes after taking off, the second consecutive launch failure this year for the attempts to send Musk to Mars.

But, to be fair, it was Musk’s SpaceX Falcon rocket that got a replacement crew up to the International Space Station to relieve the two NASA astronauts who’d popped up there for a week and got stuck on it for nine extra months after the failure of the Boeing Starliner capsule that was supposed to bring them down again.  Their landing was marked by a pod of dolphins which swam round them, possibly looking for the fish they’d been eating before the splash frightened them away.

Actually, being weightless in space for long periods isn’t good for people.  The lack of gravity causes bone density loss, muscle wastage (including the heart because it doesn’t have to work as hard to pump blood round the body), reduced blood volume and a build-up of fluids that change the shape of their eyeballs and give the symptoms of a constant cold while accumulating in the brain.  So, by the time he gets to Mars, Musk will be a snuffly 9-stone weakling.

Next week, our very own snuffly 9-stone weakling, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, is expected to cut benefits that primarily affect disabled people while not increasing taxes on those who actually can afford it.  I thought this was a Labour government.  Where did I get lost? 

After Labour said they wouldn’t be increasing any taxes, Kemi Badenoch, the opposition leader, accused the government of planning to introduce a stealth tax by not increasing the threshold above which tax is payable, something that her own party did for years while they were in power and digging themselves still deeper into their financial hole.  Not the sharpest pencil in the box, Badenoch, but she’s lucky that even the prime minister doesn’t seem to care very much about anything.

My Conservative friend believes that self-made business owners shouldn’t be penalised for their success (or, as we cynics call it, their luck).  For the sake of peace and quiet, let’s accept this for as long as they’re still running the business, then charge them 100% tax on everything over a certain level when they sell shares to outsiders, or die. 

I’ve just had a letter headed “About the general increases in benefits” telling me how much my pension will be from April.  Benefits?  I’ve spent a lifetime buying my pension, it’s not a “benefit”, it’s my money they’re now giving back to me.  Talk about weasel words trying to make me feel grateful for getting my own money back.

But there is a little good news:  the Royal College of General Practitioners has voted to drop its longstanding opposition to assisted dying and joins the Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Surgeons, Royal College of Anaesthetists, and the British Medical Association in taking a neutral position on the subject.

GBNews, Tory leaders, national borders, abortion and Hermes’ incompetence

5 October 2024

GBNews has obviously been doing some research into their market because I received an unsolicited email from them last Sunday giving me the latest headlines.  It was obvious that they believe they know a lot about me so I’d open the email and jump at the chance to send them money.

The message was headed “For you:  Bringing you the stories that matter most to you” so I knew they really had worked hard at identifying my personal interests, and I felt warm inside that they’d gone to all that trouble.

The update was obviously designed to appeal to red-top readers and included just 12 pictures and headlines leading to the more important stories last Sunday.  Five of the them were about royals, three of them about Harry and Meghan, our ex-pat royals. 

There were also five stories implying that Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves might not be the best people to run the country:  pensioners having to return to work, more than 2m extra people now paying tax, “sick-note Britain”, “11 taxes Rachel Reeves could increase to fill Labour’s ‘black hole’” and an invitation to vote on “Do you trust Starmer and Reeves with this country?  VOTE NOW” which will give them a guaranteed scientifically unrepresentative view of Britons’ feelings about the Labour government for a future email.

The other two top stories of the day were “Virgin Media issues broadband warning to millions of UK households who break the ‘golden rule’ of good WiFi” and “Major car brands recall 350,000 vehicles amid fears engines will be replaced and airbags may injure drivers”.

Well, I mean, royals, politics, broadband and cars – right up there with crotcheting in my list of interests. 

I have to admit that I didn’t open all the links but the style of those I did read seemed to be aiming at readers of the Daily Mail, which is not one of my favourite news sources and comes way below Reacher books.  But I did love the reference to eleven taxes that could be increased.  I bet I could think of more than eleven.  Increasing taxes on champagne, olives, tofu, The Guardian, the Hampstead & Highgate Express and the wokerati are six for starters.

The Tories’ grasp of Britain’s problems was as obvious at their party conference as Labour’s conference the previous week had been innovative.  The only excitement on the menu was supposed to be the “Vote For Me” speeches from the four people stupid enough to want to be the party’s leader. 

There was a memorable reference in Kemi Badenoch’s pre-conference pamphlet which apparently used words to the effect of ‘Right is Left and Left is Right’.  I expected a ‘(8)’ at the end because it looked like a red-top crossword clue leading to the answer ‘oxymoron’;  surely she can’t have meant ‘Left is right’. 

Furthermore, all four speakers exceeded the time limit they’d been allocated which doesn’t augur well for whoever wins, if ‘win’ is the right word for a poisoned chalice.

Speakers at the Royal Institution are given an hour to explain their specialist subject to the public.  At the end of their hour, a bell rings and they wind up in a couple of sentences.  The neatest lecture on record is one speaker who heard the bell, finished a sentence and stopped.

A mudblood Trump could be about to cause some discussion in America when Melania’s memoir, to be published next week, reveals her to be a supporter of women’s rights to abortion while her husband is busy leading the Republicans’ efforts to limit women’s rights. Where do they see the dividing line between preventing women having abortions (good because that’s Republican policy) and making them cover their faces and bodies in public (bad because that’s Taliban policy)?

The border between Switzerland and Italy has recently been moved without a shot being fired.  Between Switzerland’s Zermatt region and Italy’s Aosta valley, it has traditionally followed the watershed or ridge lines of glaciers, firn or perpetual snow but, as the glaciers have retreated, so have the dividing lines moved.

Changes to the border were agreed by a joint Italian-Swiss commission in May last year and the Swiss have now approved the treaty.  Italy’s approval is still awaited but nobody seems terribly exercised by either the change or the delay.

Further east, Mount Everest is now an estimated 15-50 metres higher than it was about 90,000 years ago (no, I don’t know how it was measured that long ago).  It’s known to have been formed when the Indian tectonic plate crashed into the Eurasian plate and the collision threw up the Himalayas, a bit like pushing a sample of jam in a saucer to see if the surface rises, thus showing it’s cooked.  Neither the Himalayas nor the Alps are yet quite cooked.

In the UK, Hermes, whose policy is to call itself Evri in the vain hope of breaking with the appalling reputation it had earned as Hermes, is at it again.  I recently bought something from Temu who reported its passage through various depots and airports(!) before handing it over to Evri who proved they delivered it by sending me a photograph of its being put into somebody else’s letterbox. 

I was also told after I’d placed the order that Temu is apparently a marketplace for small suppliers in China.  If I’d known this, I’d never have spent £10 on some plastic bags that were going to be flown half way round the world.  Online, they just seemed to be the best quality at the price but burning carbon fuel to send them 5,000 miles to get Evri to deliver them to the wrong house is just crazy.  I won’t be using Temu again and I’m waiting to see how Evri respond to my complaint …

By the way, why has the English transliteration of the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy been changed from Zelenskiy by some, but not all, news sources, when it used to be Zelensky anyway?  Is it an attempt to acknowledge an almost inaudible extension of the last syllable?

US electioneering,UK’s leaders, radioactive peaches and oysters,

14 September 2024

Last week saw the first – and only? – debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump and immediate reactions, even from Fox News, were that Harris had won:  a snap poll by CNN showed 63% for Harris and 37% for Trump.  The Democrats no doubt also benefitted from the contrast between this debate and the earlier skirmish between Trump and Joe Biden, which Biden fluffed so badly.

Another move in Harris’s favour came from Taylor Swift whose AI-generated image had been broadcast by Trump and appeared to show that she and her fans were Trump supporters, and an earlier post that had called her a “childless cat lady”.  Having stayed away from the tussle so far, this brought her into the open and she has now endorsed Harris for president, saying “she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos”. 

She included a picture of herself with one of her cats and signed off as “Childless cat lady”.

Harris succeeded by being well-prepared and leading Trump into his usual, incomprehensible rants about unrelated topics.

It’s a bit like how to reply when somebody is aggressive and swears at you or insults you:  leave a slight pause and ask what they said.  They then repeat it and you say “I thought that’s what you said” and you stop, turn away and walk off, ignoring any attempts they make to amplify the original comment.

One of the ads that pop up on my computer claimed that there are 10 different measures of intelligence.  I naturally didn’t click on it but I did have a vision of Trump getting one answer right in each of the 10 tests and then claiming he scored 10 out of 10, or 100% …

Me, I’d vote for Harris because she’s beautiful, looks intelligent and has an irresistible smile.  My Conservative friend would vote for Trump because he’s not Biden or his protegé.  Aren’t they both great reasons for helping elect a new Commander-in-Chief!

Out in the field, the Republican candidate for the Senate in Montana, a state that could decide which party controls the Senate, is busy rewriting his CV.  Records written at the time show he left the military because of injury, disillusionment over military personnel policies and refusing the offer of a desk job but, on the campaign trail, he’s now claiming to have been “discharged” because of wounds suffered while he was on duty.

Over here, OfCom, which fined Royal Mail £5.6m last year because it failed to deliver 20% of its first class post on time, is now saying they might let Royal Mail off delivering second class mail on Saturdays, reducing the contractual commitments they demanded of Royal Mail when the service was privatised.  This seems stupid since postal workers will still have to do their rounds on Saturdays to deliver first class mail so why not take second class letters as well?

The aim is presumably to reduce staff costs while increasing profits for the owners while, quite coincidentally, its parent company is currently considering an offer (which is subject to a national security review) from the Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky.

I no longer understand quite how the Post Office, Royal Mail and Parcelforce are now related.  I stamped an envelope recently and took it into the local post office to add the extra costs of ‘Signed for Delivery’.  We can’t do that, I was told, because the stamp is Royal Mail and getting mail signed for is the Post Office.  Or possibly vice versa

The decision to remove the winter heating payment from people who don’t receive pension credits has been widely criticised and it does appear that it might not have been properly thought through.  One commentator has pointed out that the £1.3bn saved will barely cover 8 weeks’ spending on “the useless HS2 – spending that is set to continue for the next five years”.

They go on to say that Keir Starmer must stop rubbishing the Tories and show how Labour can save “prisons, hospitals, schools and care homes” (something the Tories so disastrously failed to do in 14 years).

On the other side, there seems no great enthusiasm within the parliamentary party for any of the Tories who want to take over from Rishi Sunak (and the rest of us couldn’t give a hoot).

In Japan, they are still facing problems over the removal of 880 tons of extremely dangerous radioactive material that is still in Fukushima after the 2011 earthquake destroyed three of the nuclear plant’s six reactors.  Radiation levels in the debris are still so high that the Tokyo Electric Power Company has had to develop specialised robots to extract a tiny sample for testing.

They’re also promoting food grown in the Fukushima area and Harrods now sells Fukushima peaches (£80 for a box of 3, but that’s Harrods for you).  The peaches are apparently known for their juicy, sweet taste – and possibly because they glow in dark kitchens when night starvation takes you in there for a fruity snack.

Now here’s a confession:  I’ve never liked oysters.  Apart from a feeling of distaste at eating something that’s still alive, twitches when you dribble lemon juice on it and has the consistency of fresh snot, all you can taste is salt (and lemon juice). 

Anyway, conservationists are now employing oysters’ skills at filtering water (an adult oyster can filter 200 litres of water a day) to create oyster reefs which will attract other species to the filtered water and help rebalance the marine ecology.  Thames Water will probably start selling packs of three oysters for £80 because they won’t just taste of oyster but will have the added gustatory subtleties extracted from untreated sewage and retained in their bodies.

The next, obvious step is to do away with all those expensive sewage treatment plants and create oyster beds in the outflow systems.

I’m now going to find a quiet place and lie down for a bit.

Paying more tax, a lettuce and Banksy

24 August 2024

We have a new government and many people will be paying more tax.  One of the new Chancellor’s first decisions was that the Winter Fuel Payment of up to £300 to pensioners who don’t receive pension credit or other means-tested benefits is being scrapped for all.  (I hope its withdrawal will be subject to ‘marginal’ adjustments so that somebody who gets, say, £10 more than the means-tested limit doesn’t suddenly lose the £300.)

However, I must admit that I applaud the principle.  We have received this in the past but didn’t really need it ourselves so we gave ours to friends who needed it more and to a charity such as The Trussell Trust (who, incidentally, give a list on their website of household goods most welcomed by foodbanks, and where your nearest collection point is.)

Other hopeful signs that our new leaders realise that, once the family silver has all gone, you need to cut unnecessary costs and find another source of income.  Limiting winter fuel payments is a positive step towards the former, as is the decision to write off the £700m already spent by the last government and cut the £10bn they had planned to spend over 6 years sending asylum seekers to Rwanda.

Rachel Reeves has also indicated that the autumn budget is likely to be tough but at least some of us are hoping she’ll feel able to unfreeze the ‘personal allowance’, which people can receive before they have to pay tax;  the Tories thought this was a brilliant wheeze because it was worst for those who didn’t earn very much – which is exactly why I hope she will unfreeze it so people on the borderline do start to get some help meeting the ever-increasing costs of life’s little luxuries, like food and heating.

Spain’s socialist government tried an interesting experiment in 2022 when it introduced a “temporary” solidarity wealth tax to be collected in 2023 and 2024 from those whose net wealth exceeds €3m (£2.6m).  It’s estimated that it will only apply to 0.5% of the households in Spain.

The Tax Justice Network is a British group of researchers and activists, founded in 2003 which “believes our tax and financial systems are our most powerful tools for creating a just society that gives equal weight to the needs of everyone.”  It focuses on tax avoidance and tax havens and has calculated that a similar tax imposed worldwide would free up trillions of dollars to give help where it’s most needed, from relieving those suffering from starvation and ill-health to helping slow climate change.  If it were introduced just in the UK (which Reeves has sadly ruled out), it could raise some £25bn a year …

This is of course a dream, but what a wonderful one!  Let’s start with small steps and, full disclosure, I’d be happy to pay more tax despite not being in the top 0.5% of Britain’s wealthiest people, but nor am I in the bottom 0.5%.  There’s enough wealth in this country for everyone to be able to live comfortably so why don’t we spread it around more evenly?

Reeves has said she is inheriting the worst financial position in 80 years and has accused the Conservatives of being economical with the truth about a forecast overspend of £22bn in government departments.  While nobody really believes her predecessor was the sharpest pencil in the box, it is traditional for the incoming Chancellor of a new government to make things look as bleak as possible to throw the blame onto the previous government so we must expect some over-reaction in her first budget.

She’s already said she’s planning to raise more revenue from inheritance tax and capital gains tax and to cut public expenditure.

She’s likely to face the usual threats from the very rich to leave the country if they have to pay more tax but, despite similar threats when three Scandinavian countries introduced wealth taxes, only 0.01% of the richest households did actually move out.  That’s one in ten thousand of them.  Pessimistic estimates of similar migration rates from the UK in similar circumstances reckon that 0.02% (one in five thousand) of the richest families might leave the country.

Bon voyage!

(At this point, I realise that I can now expect an outraged email from my Conservative friend who believes that entrepreneurs should be allowed to grow businesses from scratch and build them up into huge corporations, becoming unconscionably rich in the process.  Of course his opinion is valid, I just disagree because I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the greatest number of people.  Nor do I believe that everybody receiving state benefits is milking the system and should just get on their bikes and get a job.)

Luckily, some people retain a sense of the absurd and the satirical artists’ collective ‘Led by Donkeys’ recently lowered a banner behind Liz Truss while she was giving a speech supporting Donald Trump’s attempts to get re-elected, showing a lettuce over the words “I crashed the economy.”  (Remember The Daily Star newspaper featured a lettuce while she was prime minister to see if it would still be alive when she had to resign as prime minister, and it was?)

Led by Donkeys had predicted she’d say “That’s not funny” and storm off the stage.  In fact, she said “That’s not funny” and stormed off the stage, adding that the group were “far left activists” and “I won’t stand for it”.  Sit, lady, sit.

Another iconoclast is Banksy who has been active for longer than most of us realised.  He’s done thousands of pictures, many of which just raise a smile but some of his works make clear social comment which is then endlessly analysed by critics who want his work to have deeper meanings.  He remains anonymous, he doesn’t obviously do his work for money, and he seems to accept the transience of all graffiti.


Motion and change, Israeli pogrom and private sewers

6 April 2024

We know that everything is in motion, from sub-atomic particles, to the corpuscles churning through our veins, to the fragmentation of Gondwanaland to the moon revolving round the earth which is revolving around the sun to the expansion of spacetime itself.  We also know that if nothing moved, everything would stop and become no more than a snapshot on the wall of the gods’ dining room on the second floor of the ninth dimension.

We also know that motion changes things, and that change involves motion.  Everything moves all the time, some things faster than others, but everything is in motion.

Just imagine time stops.  No ticking clock, no beating of the heart.  Everything is frozen because things can’t move without taking time to do it.  Or imagine, things stop moving.  How do you know if you haven’t got time to measure that time has passed but nothing’s moved.

All this means is that time and space (i.e. just stuff, from ants’ breakfasts to dark energy) are inseparable and that’s where we live, in spacetime which is constantly changing, so there’s no point trying to resist change.  Or to welcome it come to that;  we just have to accept that things are changing all the time.                                                        

Luckily, our awareness of these changes is limited to those that affect the way we live and those we are hear about here and now.  Of course the past influences us now but, if we did something yesterday that we now regret, we can’t go back and change it.  If it affected someone else, we can apologise and try to put it right but, if we can’t, we shouldn’t worry about it.  People who feel regret or sadness for something that happened are living in the past, which can’t changed.

The flipside is that if we worry about what might happen tomorrow or the next day, we’re living in the future, and all we can do is take precautions today to protect us when tomorrow comes:  save money now for a pension and, if you haven’t got enough money to do this, stop worrying about it;  worry won’t give you a pension fund but it will make you feel bad.

In practice, we need to make some preparations for the morrow, but we can only make them now.  If I haven’t got a clean pair of pants for tomorrow, I’ll do a wash today and make sure they’re dry before I need them;  there’s nowt worse than soggy pants, and I speak as someone who waited till the transfer bus came into sight before I left the sea in Corfu, pulled my jeans over a wet bathing costume, added a T-shirt, picked up my case and boarded the bus.

Six hours later, we were all still sitting sealed in a plane at Corfu airport as it got hotter and hotter while the crew tried to start the engine.  They finally gave up, bussed us to a local hotel and checked us in for the night.  In the room I stripped off my (by then) damp jeans and hung them over a chair on the balcony, then put my wet swimming costume in a plastic bag.  There are some joys in life that we don’t recognise until we experience them.

There seem to have been too many changes in the world recently and the only one that even veers in the right direction is the internal combustion of the Tory party.  Incidentally, of which man was it recently written by one of his own people saying “His madness has been described as “delusional” and “terrifying”, adding “This man is putting us all at risk:  Our future, our children’s future, the strategic alliance that is the keystone of [our country’s] national security.”  Others, also of his own people, have said he’s “off the rails” and an existential danger to [his country].  He must be gone from our lives”?

  • Boris Johnson
  • Donald Trump
  • Benjamin Netanyahu
  • Vladimir Putin

The correct answer is Netanyahu but it could be any of them and that’s what frightens me. 

His recent murders included precision attacks on an aid convoy run by World Central Kitchen that killed seven people in three trucks that weren’t travelling in convoy but had up to a mile between them, taking supplies to people who are being exterminated by Israel.  You’d think that, knowing what had happened to Jews in the Second World War, some of the Jewish leaders of Israel would see the similarities with what their state is now doing to Gazans.

Even Joe Biden, hitherto having failed to condemn Israel, seems to have come off the fence and more than 600 UK lawyers, including three former supreme court justices, have warned the government that it’s breaking international law by continuing to send arms to Israel.  A friend has said “Aha, but we import more arms from Israel than we export to them.”  I have no idea if this is true but, if it is, why don’t we increase our imports of weapons from them to reduce the stocks they’re using to kill charity volunteers and starving Gazans who Israel has forced out of their homes into concentration refugee camps?

Back at the ranch, all we can offer is the chance to share what used to be the clear waters of rivers, lakes and beaches with piles of shit, shredded lavatory paper and used condoms.  The water companies that were privatised (surely one of the stupidest decisions a UK government every made) (well, along with the railways) knew they were taking on crumbling Victorian sewerage infrastructure but, rather than plan for its replacement, chose to give a lot of its income to its management and shareholders instead.

Britain’s biggest water company, Thames Water, now seems to be on the point of being renationalised and South West Water blames its problems on having more coastline than any other British water company.  Really?  And this wasn’t known when it was privatised?  You’ll probably find Slartibartfast’s signature in one of Cornwall’s smaller coves.

Kindness, transphobia, dying in Alabama, love, money and repentance

10 February 2024

An impressive example of kindness and compassion was reported this week when Esther Ghey’s, Brianna’s mother, said she’d be open to meeting the mother of one of the teenage thugs who horrifically murdered her daughter to tell her she “does not blame her for what her child has done”. 

Brianna Ghey was an ‘out and proud’ transgender girl and the judge decided this was the “driving force” behind her “exceptionally brutal” killing.  The two murderers, whom I refuse to humanise with names, were given sentences of 22 and 20 years.

This kindness was disappointingly balanced by the unkindness and insensitivity which Rishi Sunak demonstrated at Prime Minister’s Questions last week when, even knowing that Brianna’s mother was in the gallery, he implicitly showed his transphobia and then refused to apologise.

My heart also goes out to Brianna herself, imagining what she must have suffered in the last few minutes of her life as she was repeatedly stabbed and bled to death.

Have we learned nothing since various prophets and leaders preached peace and understanding?  I have no more right to impose my views about, say, trans people on other people than they have to impose their views on me?  We can discuss our differences but failing to accept another’s views doesn’t justify a death sentence. 

You might remember that I wrote last September about the state of Alabama spending over an hour in 2022 trying to find a vein into which they could insert the needle full of poison that would kill Kenneth Smith.  (You have to be a very special sort of person to be prepared to do that.)

Well, they beat him in the end and killed Smith on 25 January using nitrogen gas, previously untested on humans but claimed by the state to be “perhaps the most humane method of execution ever devised”.  It took him 22 minutes to die, during which an eye-witness reported that he “writhed and convulsed on the gurney. He took deep breaths, his body shaking violently with his eyes rolling in the back of his head.”

Rev. Jeff Hood, Smith’s spiritual adviser, who was present during the execution, said prison officials in the room “were visibly surprised at how bad this thing went.”

When our older dog’s time had come, the vet gave her an injection and she fell asleep and died in less than a minute with no visible discomfort.  He said it was a mixture of a barbiturate and a diazepine and you’d think that, somewhere in Alabama, somebody would be clever enough to wonder if this would be a painless and fast way to kill a person.

I rather admire our new king who has broken tradition by announcing he’s had treatment for an enlarged prostate so as to encourage other men of a certain age to get theirs tested.  He’s also been found to have cancer, though its location and stage haven’t been released.  Wouldn’t it be great if people generally did admit to their medical problems, particularly with mental health, to reduce the social stigma sometimes attached to them and demonstrate just how many people are currently suffering in silence.

An incidental benefit of this might be to realise that your nearest and dearest has a shorter life expectancy than you’d hoped so we should all tell people today that we love them before it’s too late, even if they already know.

Keir Starmer seems almost as determined to undermine Labour’s chances at the next election as the Conservatives are.  His watering down a commitment to funding green energy has sadly overshadowed his commitment to allow everyone a right to equal pay.  I didn’t know that Conservatives believed black, Asian and minority ethnic workers and disabled people aren’t worth the same as white Brits so they can be paid less.  How disgusting is that!

A new government will also need money to repair what’s been broken by the Conservatives in the last 13 years, perhaps starting with the NHS, and that might mean previous pledges would have to be updated.

The Tories have become adept at sneaking tax increases under the counter while boasting about tax cuts.  For example, over the last few years, they’ve given local authorities more ‘autonomy’, or responsibility for providing local services, but failed to give them enough money to do this so all of us council tax payers have to pay more for them.

They’ve also taken money from us by increasing the age at which people can claim the state pension.  The UK pension age was 65, is now 66, is set to rise to 67 between 2026 and 2028 and possibly to 71 by 2041, not just because people are living longer but because nobody dared do the sums to show the chances that, when every child born in any year, they would claim a pension 65 (as it was) years later.  Why was this so difficult?  Because it was after the next general election and getting themselves re-elected was more important to politicians than the future of the country.

Sadly, one person who only qualified for his pension last year died in January.  I first discovered Erwin James when he regularly wrote his humane – and often very funny – articles in the Guardian about his life in prison.  After his release, he wrote about his shit childhood and the descent into crime that ultimately led to his receiving in 1984 a sentence of 14 years for murder when he gave himself up after he’d spent some years hiding in the Foreign Legion.   The sentence was later increased to 25 years and subsequently reduced to 20 for good behaviour – he was only lucky not to live in Alabama.

While he was incarcerated and still facing many years in prison, James discovered the joys of the education he’d never had, worked hard, was awarded an Open University degree in history and started writing.  On his release in 2004, he became a journalist and writer, and wrote about his life in ‘A Life Inside’ (2003), ‘The Home Stretch’ (2005) and ‘Redeemable’ (2016).

The world needs more people like James and fewer people like … (fill in the name(s) of your unfavouritest people here).

Paying for votes, far right gains, California leads the way

25 November 2023

The Tory party is now desperate enough to try buying votes with a budget that left next year’s promised pension increase unchanged and eased some of the restrictions on ISAs for rich people with money to spare;  yes, they increased Universal Credits but they also said that shirkers and scroungers who refuse to accept jobs will lose all rights to state benefits including free prescriptions and help with energy bills.  Quite right too.  Why should the rest of us support shirkers like disabled people and people with long-term chronic illnesses and mental health problems and single parents with young children who need jobs to fit round school hours and term time? Let them eat cake. 

The Tories are also boasting about how they’ve recovered almost half what they’ve lost since they’ve been in power and imposed austerity, and that inflation is half its recent peak even though it’s still more than twice their target.  And look at the money they’re saving by not spending money on public services;  I mean, who needs public services anyway when you have spare money to put into ISAs?

So, while we’re celebrating all these brilliant achievements, let’s have an early election to re-elect the Conservatives and they can do it all over again.

But perhaps we should be grateful for small mercies.  It seems that, in a way that makes our own dear Tories seem relatively moderate, the far right is gaining ground in other countries.  In France, Marine le Pen is gaining followers and, in the recent Dutch elections, Geert Wilders’ party, the anti-Islam party PVV, got more votes than any other single party.

Wilders himself looks relatively normal from a distance but, in 2007 (and again in 2008), described the Qur’an as a “fascist book” and has proposed “a head rag tax” of €1,000 on headscarves.  He specifically doesn’t like Moroccans and got a criminal record in 2014 for “unlawful discrimination [by] insulting a group”.  He brought to mind a line from a Richard Thompson song:  “Everybody don’t like something and we all don’t like you”.

In 2015, he argued for a closure of the Dutch borders and said the Dutch parliament was “fake” because it didn’t agree with him.  It remains to be seen whether he can now get enough support from other parties to form a government.

In Argentina, the anti-woke “libertarian” Javier Milei has won a landslide victory in the presidential elections, despite having a hairstyle that comes a close second to Donald Trump’s.  He calls his predecessors “socialist” because they legalised gay marriage and abortion and even threatened to tax the rich.

And, of course, there’s still Trump himself bleating in the shadows, planning to punish anybody who has criticised him (“vermin” as he calls them), when he’s elected next year and to disempower American idiosyncrasies such as democracy and the rule of law, the justice department, the FBI and other federal agencies, leading the country towards total authoritarianism

You’d think these people, especially the Dutch, would remember this has been tried before and that people like Adolf Hitler, Idi Amin and Saddam Hussein are now, I hope, in a secure area of Hell where they have to build walls around themselves that collapse just as they’re trying to fit the capstone.  (Outside their cage, Sisyphus is watching their endlessly fruitless endeavours, thinking “There but for the grace of Satan go I”.)

But we do have our own Scheißmeisters here in England even though they’re rather feebler than the Big Guys. 

At kindergarten level, the Home Secretary, James Cleverly, was accused of dissing Stockton after the Labour MP for Stockton North, Alex Cunningham, asked Rishi Sunak at Wednesday’s PMQs why 34% of children in his constituency were in poverty and Cunningham, who was obviously listening to the answer, heard Cleverly say “Because it’s a shit-hole”.

Cleverly initially said he’d never say that, then someone in his office said “James made a comment.  He called Alex Cunningham a shit MP.  He apologises for unparliamentary language.”

Suitably briefed, Cleverly subsequently apologised for using “unparliamentary” language about another MP.

Oh please!  Nobody with an IQ greater than their age would have said that one in three children are suffering because their constituency’s got a shit MP.  All he achieved by trying to cover his back was to lose a lot of votes in Stockton for the Conservatives.

Why couldn’t he just say “It was meant as a joke but it was totally tasteless, and I’m sorry”?  Why can’t more people just fess up and apologise?

In eastern Missouri, a committee in the St Charles city-county library system has plumbed similar self-defeating depths of stupidity by banning the book Bang Like a Porn Star: Sex Tips from the Pros, thereby giving worldwide publicity to a book about sexuality and sexual health for gay men which the committee thinks is unsuitable.

Better news came from the town of Tracy, California where the first commercial direct air capture plant opened last week.  It uses limestone, apparently the second most common mineral in the earth’s crust (after silicon dioxide, SiO2, which is most commonly found in sand and quartz), to absorb carbon from the air.  The limestone is heated to 899oC (1,650oF) when it breaks down into carbon dioxide and calcium oxide.  The carbon dioxide is locked up again in concrete that can be used in construction while the calcium oxide is in the form of a grey powder which is sprayed with water and then absorbs carbon from the air.

Also in California, there are more than 100 projects using state-funded solar panels which will, by 2030, produce enough power for 150,000 tenant families in low-income rental buildings across the state.  Over here, we’re still reducing stocks of council housing by letting tenants buy them so they can move and rent them out to councils at twice what they were paying.

The bad news for those of us wanting to go into space is that studies of astronauts’ physical condition after spending some time in space have shown that, in addition to wasting muscles, thinner bones and increased risk of getting cancer, the men may be more prone to erectile dysfunction so, when we colonise the moon, we’ll have to send out a new bunch of men every generation.

The quote of the week came from Professor Sir Chris Whitty at the Covid enquiry when he was asked if he had seen the then prime minister as indecisive or chaotic and said “I think that the way Mr Johnson took decisions was unique to him.”  How exquisitely phrased.

The Peter Principle writ large, and rocket science

21 October 2023

In 1968, Laurence J Peter published The Peter Principle which drew attention to the fact that, for as long as they do their job competently, people get promoted until they reach a job they can’t do and they become incompetent in the new role.  (He added the caveat that this wasn’t necessarily because they were intrinsically incompetent but because the new job required skills and experience that their previous job didn’t.)

So, he implies, there’s a tendency for people at the top to be incompetent, whether they’re politicians or directors / trustees, but their failings are concealed by the churn factor:  people leave and are replaced by new people, some of whom are competent and prevent complete collapse.

It’s not an anglophone monopoly and examples can be found all over the world, from Myanmar to Afghanistan, and it’s worst where incompetent dictators and military rulers are able to impose their incompetence on whole countries.

The most shocking example last week was when, Israel Katz, Israel’s energy minister, said in response to claims that Hamas is believed to be holding about 200 hostages in Gaza: “Humanitarian aid to Gaza? No electrical switch will be turned on, no water hydrant will be opened and no fuel truck will enter until the Israeli abductees are returned home. Humanitarianism for humanitarianism. And no one will preach us morality.”  Does Katz not understand what “humanitarianism” and “morality” actually involve?

He also seems to have swallowed the false syllogism:

  • Hamas is a terrorist group
  • Hamas is based in Gaza
  • Therefore everybody in Gaza is a terrorist.

Over here last December, a senior civil servant formally recommended to Lee Rowley, the building safety minister, that he should order a formal investigation into crumbling concrete in schools and public buildings and social housing blocks (remember the Ronan Point collapse in 1968?).  Rowley returned the recommendation for a “substantial rewrite” and demanded it include the option of doing nothing.  Then a primary school ceiling collapsed.

China’s Central Commission for Discipline Inspection has had Liu Liange, former chair of the Bank of China, arrested for taking bribes and illegally approving loans.  Ah well, bankers will be bankers.

The EU has U-turned on its decision to ban the most toxic chemicals in consumer products.  I wonder if the UK is ahead of the EU and has already banned them?  If so, there’s one real advantage of Brexit.

The first European to land in Australia was the Dutch navigator Willem Janszoon in 1606 (or, more likely, one of his crew whose name has been lost in time who secured the ship so Janszoon wouldn’t get his feet wet).  29 other European explorers followed in the 17th century and it became known as New Holland.  Then, the best part of two centuries after the first landing, Lieutenant James Cook mapped the east coast, ‘claimed’ it for Britain and it became known as Australia.  Nobody thought of consulting the people who’d lived there for the previous 65,000 years and believed that ‘owning’ the land they lived on was as stupid as ‘owning’ the air they breathed.

Last week, Australians voted on whether the Aboriginal peoples should be recognised in the country’s constitution and be allowed to advise parliament on matters concerning the indigenous peoples;  the immigrants voted not to give them these rights.  It sounds barss ackwards to me; shouldn’t the indigenous people have voted on whether the immigrants should have a say in running their country?  (Interestingly, the only state to vote for the proposal was the ACT, which was created to house the immigrants’ parliament.)

In New Zealand, just across the water from Australia, many Pakeha New Zealanders (New Zealanders of European descent) were shocked by the result since Māori people participate fully in their country’s government.

Perhaps it’s because Britain populated Australia with its unwanted convicts and New Zealand with its aspirant kiwi-fruit farmers.

Forbes magazine publishes an annual list of the 400 wealthiest people in America and, for the second time in three years, Donald Trump isn’t in it.  Trump’s response summarises his whole approach to life:  “I demand a full apology from the failing Forbes magazine” he wrote on Truth Social, his failing social media platform.  What a sad man, to care whether or not he’s on a list, particularly a list published by a magazine he thinks is “failing”.

In Northern Ireland, pollution has poured so much waste into Lough Neagh that it’s covering of blue-green algae is so extensive it can be seen from space.

In the UK as a whole, accurate estimates of when people will be able to draw pensions can be made from the day they’re born* and allowances can be made for the proportion of them who will die before they reach retirement age.  In the same way, it’s not rocket science** to forecast the probable future need for ‘social housing’ from projections of demographic trends.

In 1980, most care homes were run by local authorities, the NHS and charities which provided 225,000 beds while the private sector provided 47,000 beds.  Last year, despite an ever-increasing number of older people, only 25,000 beds were provided by local government, the NHS and charities while the private sector provided 380,000 beds and people forced to live in homes run by the larger private companies donated between 8% and 42% of their fees to the homes’ owners.

In the same period the demand for social housing has grown while successive governments have reduced the number of units available by selling them to their occupants.  This has in turn contributed to the rise in house prices that has prevented so many people buying their own properties, thereby leading to an increased demand for social housing …

The Labour party has promised to build 1.5m new homes in the next 5 years, 300,000 a year, including a huge increase in the number of ‘affordable’ homes, and claims to be prepared to take on local opposition to do so.  However, its conference was sadly reticent about the need for low-carbon buildings and the environmental impact of new developments.

However, we must take all politicians’ promises with a grain of salt since another politician has recently reduced ‘promises’ to homeopathic levels by downgrading them to ‘pledges’, and then to ‘aspirations’, and then to ‘not a chance in hell’.

*          I’m not suggesting this is actually done, merely that it’s possible.

**        My physicist / engineering son says rocket science is a doddle – fuel, oxygen and a cigarette lighter – it’s rocket engineering that’s difficult.

Ship of Fools, taxing the unwise, social care in the UK

28 January 2023

Plato forecast the decay of our government almost 2,500 years ago.  The captain of the 2023 ship of fools has the telescope to his blind eye and says he can’t see any ships (his two predecessors were forced to walk the plank), the first mate is facing about 25 charges of bullying from the crew, the navigator learnt his trade on a small pool of K9P, the bursar has run out of money but refuses to ask the owners for more, the sailmaker had given millions to his grandmother’s knitting circle for sails that can’t be used, the surgeon can’t afford to stay warm, the quartermaster spent so long fiddling the books that he didn’t get enough food for the voyage, the serjeant at arms spends her time repelling boarders who are bringing them more provisions, and the lookout in the crow’s nest is on strike.

Every week I promise myself I’m not going to mutter about politics and every week some politician does something irresistibly stupid or is caught not evading taxes.  In this case, a tax expert talking about the various levels of penalty said that, basically, if someone’s made an honest mistake, HMRC impose no penalty and they just have to pay the extra tax due;  if they’ve “made an error” and been negligent and/or careless, the penalty can be anything up to 30%, if they’ve been wilfully dishonest, the penalty can be between 30% and 200%.  Guess who only just scraped into the negligent / careless penalty.

Then Jacob Rees-Mogg wrote about Brexit in the Daily Mail and said “The moment of national renewal has come.  We can embark on this new age with confidence and excitement.  Over two millenniums since mighty Augustus quelled the unrest and strife in ancient Rome …”  Hang on a minute.  ‘Millenniums’?  Surely he knows that should be ‘millennia’, or was he making allowances for people who read the Daily Mail?

Anyway, enough of politics, sort of.

Governments have known since we were born exactly when we were going to retire but did that lead anybody to save enough money to pay our state pensions 65 years (and many governments of all colours) later?  Not entirely;  so they delayed retirement ages to take a few years’ pension from everyone.  In the financial field, this would be called a Ponzi scheme, using today’s investors to reward yesterday’s investors, leaving no money to pay back today’s investors unless they can attract more new investors (or, as the government prefers to call them, taxpayers).

The biggest problem now facing the government is the increasing number of older people needing care.  This too has been predictable from when people were born and could have been adjusted for demographic changes and medical advances as necessary.  Unfortunately, for the last 13 years, those in charge have believed money is more important than people and the visible result of their financial mismanagement is the frighteningly increased gap between the obscenely rich and the desperately poor.  

But the rich can spend huge sums on private medical treatment and care, and if the poor have to sell their electric fire to get enough money to buy food, tough, they should have worked harder. 

About 80% of care homes are run by private companies whose prime raison d’être is to make the owners and directors richer by underpaying staff and overcharging residents. 

No wonder care homes currently have more than 165,000 vacancies and are so short-staffed that many have been downgraded by the Care Quality Commission from ‘good’ when they were last inspected to ‘needs improvement’ as their standards have declined in the last few years.

One random example publicised recently, almost certainly neither the best or the worst, is Runwood Homes which claims to be “a family-led, residential care, dementia care and nursing care provider with over 62 beautiful homes and day centres to choose from. We pride ourselves on delivering innovative, personalised care with a real emphasis on celebrating the lives of each and every one of our residents” etc etc.  The firm is owned by Gordon Sanders who has taken at least £21m out of the company (i.e.  from his staff and residents) in the last 5 years despite inspectors finding multiple rule breaches in his firm’s homes.

As a carer myself, I know that a professional carer down here is paid slightly more than the minimum wage but gets only a small proportion of the £10,000 a year the business charges us for 45 minutes a day, and full-time care in a residential home can easily cost £100,000 a year.

Our firm’s owners, William and Sara Flint, trade in Devon as Bluebird Care and their company’s wealth increased by £666,000 (Aleister Crowley might have had something to say about this number) in the two years to March 2022.  This is in addition to anything they paid themselves as directors (which isn’t publicly available) and they borrow money from the company so it isn’t taxable as income. 

They therefore keep almost 30 times as much money for themselves as the average (full-time-equivalent) pay they allow their carers.  And the owners don’t even work full-time so the multiple is actually even greater. 

The archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, has called for checks on “unscrupulous people making profit inappropriately from social care” and the archbishops’ convention has called for taxes rises to fund a new NHS-style universal social care system that would cost an extra £15bn a year.

Sir Rod Steward, formerly a devoted Conservative, has offered (in a live programme on Sky News) to pay for some of the people waiting for hospital scans and said “I personally have been a Tory for a long time but I think this government should stand down now and give the Labour party a go at it, because this is heartbreaking for the nurses.”

I’m now drafting a letter:  “Dear Rod, well done, could you now look at how the Tories are failing the 900,000 people needing care?”