Bob Dylan 83 not out, Independence Day and election

25 May 2024

The big event of the week was of course that Bob Dylan celebrated his 83rd birthday yesterday (if anybody that age still actually celebrates birthdays).

It seems impossible to believe that it’s some 65 years since he left the mining towns of the mid-West and headed for New York with his guitar and complete confidence.  What’s even more impossible to believe is that, like Keith Richards, he’s survived so many drugs that are supposed to leave us all toothless and dead.

I first came across him in a TV play called ‘Madhouse on Castle Street’.  The BBC – as was the policy in those days – wiped the tape and recorded something else on top of it so no copy of it remains and the Holy Grail of his fans is to find somebody who’d taped it as it was shown and has the tape in an attic somewhere.  The only thing that sticks in my mind about the play is that one of the characters didn’t say anything but just sat on the stairs and picked away at a guitar and I liked his music so much that I remembered his name. 

Actually, I misremembered his name and thought for a while he was Bob Yellin of the Greenbriar Boys but a friend then lent me Dylan’s first two albums.  I wasn’t that impressed by his voice and returned the records but the songs stayed with me and, looking back, I wonder if it was the sheer energy of his first album.  A guy in his late teens had the chutzpah to take old blues and folk songs, make enough changes to get his name on the record as writer, pick up a guitar and harmonica and blast them into the microphone with the power of a Little Richard.

His second album was mostly songs he’d written himself although, even back then, he was more a lyricist than a composer and re-used old tunes for some of his words (‘Bob Dylan’s Dream’ uses the tune of ‘Lord Franklin’ and ‘Masters of War’ uses ‘Nottamun Town’).  It also included what’s probably his most famous song, ‘Blowing in the Wind’, although this was made famous by Peter, Paul & Mary.

His disdain for reporters and press conferences became obvious very early when he gave answers to stupid questions,  One hack asked him how many real folksingers he thought there were and he came straight back with “A hundred and thirty seven” (if I remember the number correctly).

He’s been through umpteen incarnations and still has the ability to surprise everyone by producing a good album after years of rubbish.  His voice hasn’t improved on the way and is now so wrecked that his latest albums involve his doing little more than talking his way through the lyrics to the accompaniment of a cello, a guitar and soft percussion. 

His lyrics have always been his real strength and he is often a sublime wordsmith.  He even got a Nobel prize for literature and what is widely believed to be his neuro-divergence / Asperger’s left him not knowing how to respond.  He’s certainly never given any signs that he cares what anybody else thinks of him and even a “thank you” at the end of a gig is now pretty rare.

There is a theory that, because he often changes words and adds or omits new verses in performance, he’s a perfectionist and constantly trying to get exactly the right word;  others (like me) thinks he just tries different words because it seemed a good idea at the time.  He sometimes even seems not to decide on a word until he’s singing it:  in ‘Series of Dreams’, he sings “Past the – tree of smoke” and there’s a microsecond pause before “tree” as if he didn’t know what the word was going to be until he sang it.

The other argument against perfectionism is that he’s written some really terrible lyrics and just left them as they are.  Strange really how he’s become so godlike to some fans.  Why His Bobness and not, say, The Boss?

Anyway, Bobbie, happy birthday for yesterday.

The other, comparatively minor, bit of news this week was that we’re going to have a general election on the 4th of July, Independence Day in America.  Perhaps we can remember all the achievements the Conservatives have wrought over the last 14 years and choose our own independence from them.  But let’s recall their achievements before we vote: Dave introduced the disastrous austerity years and then asked the wrong question about Brexit, thereby getting the wrong answer, and resigned;  Theresa drew red lines which were likely to be drawn in blood in Northern Ireland and resigned;  Boris didn’t take Covid seriously until far too late and resigned;  Liz tanked the economy and resigned and Sunak vowed to “Stop the Boats” by deporting people to Rwanda.  This last pledge has been so effective that the thought of being deported to Rwanda has led to a record number of people crossing to the UK so far in 2024.

The day after his announcement of the date, all four of the serious papers – the Daily Telegraph, the Financial Times, The Guardian and The Times – ran banner headlines on the front page that used the words “bet” or “gamble”, despite Sunak’s new pledges to delay his £500m scheme to fly nasty people to Rwanda till after the election, and to stop his brilliant no-smoking plans that would have been so profitable for the free-black-market.

Sunak even stooped so low as to visit a warehouse where a number of people wearing hi-vis jackets so they looked like workers asked some questions.  It turns out they were actually Conservative councillors and asked really tough questions like “Do you agree you’re the best person to be the next prime minister?”  (Nobody asked if we are all better off after 14 years of Conservative misrule but we all know the answer to that:  according to umpteen surveys and analyses, it’s “No, unless we were already rich and overpaid in 2010”.)

This was after he’d abused Keir Starmer and the Labour party for a lack of policies and solutions to all the problems that had arisen during the last 14 years of his own party’s government.  I sometimes think Sunak isn’t the sharpest pencil in the box.

Liars, pronoun problems, BRICS, raisins and Cormac McCarthy

17 June 2023

Wasn’t it fascinating last weekend to watch the UK’s best-known liar resign because he believed somebody had lied to him after he had himself been judged to have lied to (“misled” in parliamentary language) the House of Commons.  Followed by his remaining fan stamped her little foot and resigned, saying she was “heartbroken” (!) because she wasn’t given a peerage, except her resignation letter has not yet been received.  It’ll be interesting to see how ‘the people’ vote in the by-elections the resignations caused.

Reactions to Boris Johnson’s petulance were predictable, and occasionally laughable. 

One of the more serious views was that “As a master of public manipulation, Boris Johnson has few equals … The announcement [of his resignation] has familiar characteristics: ‘convicted by a kangaroo court’ [and] ‘undemocratic’ is difficult to square with the ultimate responsibility that the committee places on the House of Commons. The Labour chair is thrown into the mix to give his friends in the popular press a hook onto which to hang their anti-Labour propaganda … He can continue to cause damage to the party as he has done so conspicuously in recent years, because he retains a following in the country.” 

This could have been seen as sour grapes from one of the tofu-eating wokerati had it not been penned by Lord (Michael) Heseltine, deputy prime minister in John Major’s Conservative government from 1995 to 1997, who is clearly keen to reunite the Conservative party.

On the lighter side, the Sunday Times quoted one of his close friends who said “He is making loads of money.  He needs money. He likes money.  I think he’ll use the money to try to buy back all the people he lost in his life.” 

With friends like that, who needs enemies?

Or, as Bob Dylan wrote “All the money you made will never buy back your soul.”

A different view was taken by Gillian Keegan, the Education Secretary, who has said – apparently with a straight face – that people need to live within their means as the Government works to bring down inflation;  and that public sector pay rises risk increasing inflation and making everyone poorer.  She then produced a classic example of ‘the pronoun problem’ and said “We too must show restraint when it is needed”.

Where does this “we” come from?  Is that “we who struggle through on six-figure pay packets” or we whose existence she denies, like a friend of ours who is a young (= no pension) single-mother with a challenging 5-year old who found it hard enough to survive on child support and universal credit even before she got long covid and prices went through the roof and she can’t get a job that fits round school hours and holidays?

Not quite as unrepresented is the former American president Donald Trump who apparently had difficulties finding lawyers to represent him after several had declined to defend him at his latest court appearance.  After all, who’d use a law firm that had unsuccessfully attempted to defend prisoner 41283649 Trump Donald.  “Well, we only did it for the money” doesn’t impress.  “We did it so we could all admire his new haircut” would be better.

That evening, Fox News showed a live broadcast of Trump’s speech and, towards the end, split the screen to show side-by-side pictures of Joe Biden and Trump under which one of Trump’s loony fans in Fox had written the chyron “Wannabe dictator speaks at the White House after having his political rival arrested.”  The text remained up until the following programme and Fox News said they had “addressed” the situation – possibly with a bottle of champagne?  Fox rivals CNN and MSNBC had declined the opportunity to broadcast Trump’s rant.

South Africa is supposed to host this year’s BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) summit to discuss closer partnership between the five countries.  The problem is that R’s president is one Vladimir Putin who is wanted by an international court on charges of war crimes and, as a party to the Rome statute on which the international criminal court is based, South Africa would be required to arrest Putin on his arrival and send him to the Hague for trial.  The summit may therefore be relocated to China or India, who don’t believe suspected war criminals should be arrested.

By the way, a recent study published in the journal Current Biology claimed that worms also get the munchies when stoned.  They soaked worms in a cannabinoid solution and the worms starting eating more.  Actually, I don’t get the munchies but I do get terribly thirsty.

We ordered a food delivery this week and were sent an email saying some items we’d ordered weren’t available so they’d substituted them.  So far, fair enough since we can return unwanted substitutions but we’d ordered a 1kg packet of Sainsbury Raisins, Seedless, and they’d only got 500g packets so they substituted what we wanted with just one packet of the latter.  Wouldn’t somebody, anybody, even someone with the brains of a stoned worm, have realised two packets of 500g would have given us what we’d ordered?

The Pulitzer-winning novelist, Cormac McCarthy, died this week.  His most famous work was probably ‘The Road’, or ‘No Country for Old Men’ both of which were filmed, the latter by the Coen brothers almost straight from the book and the funniest line in a (very violent) film came directly from McCarthy’s words.

One of my favourite McCarthy quotations uses the pronoun problem to much better effect.  It comes from ‘Cities of the Plain’, one of the Border Trilogy, when someone is telling a friend about his plans to rebuild a shack on a top of a hill, miles from the nearest road.

“You think you’re goin’ to be able to get the truck up here?”

“I think we might, could comin’ up the other side.”

“What’s this we shit?  You got a rat in your pocket?”

M&S blow it, greedflation, and the shame of being British

4 March 2023

NEVER buy a present from Marks & Spencer for a friend.

I had a present at Christmas, bought at M&S, which looked good but was the wrong size so I drove 12 miles to the nearest store to exchange it, explaining it was a present.  “Can’t do it because the barcode’s missing and I don’t know how much it was” said a particularly grumpy sales assistant.  I explained the barcode had probably been removed because it showed the price and offered to get an identical pair off the rack so they could read the barcode.  “Can’t do it – NEXT!” was their friendly ‘customer services’ response as they looked at the person behind me in the queue.

I emailed ‘customer services’ and the answer was that the stores can’t change things without barcodes and I’d have to buy a new one the right size and return the old ones for a refund.

So I bought a new one and returned the original (still in its pristine packing) to the store where I thought it had probably been bought, explaining the situation and, guess what, they posted it back again (!!) with a standard form of words that I précised as “Bugger off”.

I then wrote to Stuart Machin, their chief executive, explaining the problem again and got a letter from one of his people that I précised as “Bugger off, not even the CEO can override the system”.  So I now have to write back and say I didn’t think the CEO needed to override the system but I’d assumed he had the power to authorise an ex gratia refund and/or compensation when his people had been rude and stupid and wasted my time.

If that doesn’t work, it’s the small claims court.  If some of us don’t stand up for our rights, big companies just get away with it.  All this for a [expletive deleted] pack of socks.

(Check their reputation on Trustpilot – I was shocked to see that 66% of 4,800 customers only gave them 1 star and another 9% only gave them two stars.)

Sadly, we all know what motivates chief executives.  The latest affront is BP’s CEO who could get a special bonus of up to £11.4m on top of the measly £1.4m salary and 2022 annual bonus he gets.  One leading shareholder has said the payment would be “a blatant grab”.  The only sliver of good news is the nominative determinism involved:  his name is Bernard Looney.

Which reminds me, I recently heard of a carpenter called Richard Wood and a local doctor called Katharine Gurney.  How glad I am that my family name isn’t something like Greedybastard or Draincleaner.

“Blatant grab” is a phrase that could also describe what the European Central Bank fears is happening – the unions are calling it “greedflation” (what a lovely word) – as companies that are keeping wage levels in the sub-basement increase prices by more than their costs increase so they can hide an increase in the profit margin.

As the minutes of the ECB’s February meeting are reported to have said: “Profit growth remained very strong, which suggested that the pass-through of higher costs to higher selling prices remained robust” and they will therefore be monitoring “profits and mark-up” as well as wages.  Let me know if you’d like that translated into plain English.

But some big businesses are motivated by power.  Take Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp empire which influences millions of people all over the world.  His News of the World hacked phones and some of his Fox News presenters repeatedly lied about the 2020 election having been stolen from Donald Trump.  Murdoch himself has admitted in his submission to the $1.6bn Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit against Fox News that he knew Fox News was spreading lies and allowed them to continue.  By sheer coincidence, this wasn’t reported in the Times, which he also owns.

The only body that can control this sort of thing is the government and we all know where they’re at.  ‘That Woman’ started it all when she started to sell the family silver because she was too stupid to realise that, when you’ve sold it all, you have to eat with your fingers, if you can still afford food.

The most heinous example was her 1980 Housing Act that allowed local authorities to sell council properties to their occupants so we now have a desperate shortage of state-owned properties, huge waiting lists and property developers straining at the leash to build overpriced and overcrowded estates in the green belt.  Meanwhile, council houses that were bought by their tenants are now contributing to the shortage of cheap accommodation as today’s owners let them out at inflated rents.  This week brought news that Foxtons, the estate agents, are advertising an ex-council flat in Pimlico for £3,900 a month, or £47,000 a year. How many of our incomes are more than £47,000, even before tax?

This short-termism is of course another argument for proportional representation which would give much greater continuity in policies compared with our current electoral system in which policies are based on what’s most likely to get a government re-elected at the next election and policies get shorter-sighted as an election approaches.

Earlier this week, I was talking to a medic who was injecting botox into the back of my neck and she said that the government’s closure of cottage hospitals and rehab unit beds made her “really angry”.  More family silver into the capitalists’ smelters.  You’ll just have to guess if I agreed with her.

A retired supreme court judge, Jonathan Sumption, once defended his “puny £1.6 million a year” by referring to the much larger amounts paid to comparable individuals in business, sports and entertainment – and this was way back in 2001.  Anyway, he has commented on last week’s decision about Shamima Begum’s British citizenship.  He agreed that, because the law requires the home secretary’s approval to deprive someone of their citizenship, the commission couldn’t override this, but nor was it able to consider what he describes as “the real scandal” of Begum’s exclusion.

Sumption points out that a person cannot be deprived of “British citizenship if it would render them stateless” and reminds us that, although she was 19 when this was done, her theoretical ability to claim citizenship of Bangladesh (because her parents were born there) was provisional and lapsed when she was 21.  She never even visited Bangladesh which has now disowned her anyway, so she is now 23 and “As a result of the home secretary’s decision, she is stuck in a camp in Syria, with no citizenship anywhere and no prospect of one.”

He adds “Children who make a terrible mistake are surely redeemable. But statelessness is for ever.”

I feel shamed by what I’m supposed to consider ‘my’ country. Why can’t another home secretary return her passport?  What sort of country has Britain become?  I’d be perfectly happy to let her stay in our spare room.

I didn’t know that some farms and warehouses use remotely-controlled vehicles but there’s apparently thought of delivering rental cars to their destinations on public roads by remote control.  The Law Commission of England and Wales foresees “difficulties in enforcement” which could ban remote driving in the UK from overseas “until appropriate international agreements are in place”.  I foresee difficulties, whatever appropriate agreements are in place, caused by the time lag in getting a signal from the car to the driver plus the driver’s response time plus the time taken to get the signal back to the car. 

You see the delay when UK-based TV interviewers are talking to reporters in remote countries and the delay can be up about 5 seconds.  (Have you noticed the producers tend to switch the picture from the studio to the OB unit about half way through the gap to distract viewers from the delay?) 

I reckon this means that two cars heading towards each other, each travelling at 60 mph, will get nearly 300 yards (270 metres) closer, still at a combined speed of 120 mph, in the 5 seconds before the remote-controlled car starts braking, and if there’s a bend or a dip in the road, the cars could be less than 300 yards apart before they can even see each other.  Ho hum.