11 November 2023
Why is it that the motivations of people who reach ‘the top’ are rarely obvious until it’s too late? Looking round the world today, we can see that most so-called leaders are sociopaths, and can only guess which were born sociopathic, which learned sociopathy and which had sociopathy thrust upon them. I wonder sometimes if their sociopathy is what makes them want to be low on the totem pole*.
One of the most recent and obvious examples is Benjamin Netanyahu who is happy to continue slaughtering civilians en masse, including children, until Hamas releases the hostages they’re holding. He admitted earlier this week that he wants to retain “indefinite control” over the Gaza Strip followed but, two days later, he U-turned and told Fox news “We don’t seek to conquer Gaza, we don’t seek to occupy Gaza, and we don’t seek to govern Gaza.”
Of course actions of the leaders of Hamas who ordered the 7 October attack are just as unforgiveable and their holding civilians as hostages and reportedly torturing and murdering Israeli people is condemned by all right-thinking people. As are Israel’s claims – if they’re true – that Hamas leaders are sheltering in and under hospitals and refugee camps so it’s OK for Israel to kill hundreds of medics, patients and refugees in the hope of killing a Hamas leader.
Nor must we forget the sociopaths Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping and the leaders of oppressive countries like Afghanistan and Myanmar and North Korea and rather too many in Africa. At least in America and the UK, there are still enquiries and courts that expose the extent of the sociopathy and, in both countries, former leaders are being proved dishonest and untrustworthy.
However, in Donald Trump, America not only found the classic sociopath but elected him as president and, despite all his crimes and misdemeanours, there’s a terrifying chance they might elect him again. We can only hope that, by election time, he’ll be in prison and bankrupt and something in the Constitution can be used to prevent a convicted criminal being president.
Our home-grown sociopaths pale into insignificance beside people like these but Boris Johnson came close – somebody who knows him well said they wouldn’t trust him to feed the cat – and Suella Braverman, our sociopathic Home Secretary, is emulating him with some the daftest comments we’ve seen for some time.
All over the world, pro-Palestine demonstrations have taken place to plead for a ceasefire between Israel and Gaza and today’s Peace March in London attracted an estimated 300,000 people (or tofu-eating, Guardian-reading, left-wing wokerati as Braverman might have said). The organisers, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, had invited “all people of conscience to join us in peacefully marching” and confirmed they were working with the police to ensure public safety.
In an article in the Times on Wednesday, Braverman described the event as a “hate march” organised by and for “left wingers” and “pro-Palestinian mobs” and she told the police to prevent its happening. Using suitably diplomatic language, the police reminded her of their operational independence and told her to piss off.
As I write, it appears a small counter-protest attracted a few burger-eating, Daily Mail-reading, right-wing reactionaries, more than 100 of whom were arrested for violence, but there have been no reports of any arrests on the march itself.
In defiance of the ministerial code, Braverman’s article had apparently not been cleared with Downing Street; various brown-nosed ministers have distanced themselves from her comments but Rishi ‘Never Do Today What You Can Possibly Put Off Till Tomorrow’ Sunak hasn’t yet fired her.
Not that this matters to a sociopath who wants to be prime minister next year; or, if the Tories lose the election, leader of the opposition, and is probably one of those stupid people who believes that any publicity is good publicity (what about the Yorkshire Ripper?)
At this point, I must admit to a personal feeling of sympathy for the sociopaths who are so insecure that they need something like power or money or admirers to give them any sense of self-respect. I also have great difficulty in believing that some people really are narcissists and wonder if they really think they’re wonderful when they’re constipated, or have diarrhoea.
But I do find it difficult to name powerful people in recent history who didn’t tend that way and, after some thought, could only come up with Barack Obama and John Major.
I also wonder how much of the damage they’ve suffered is down to their parents. For example, we know that Boris Johnson’s father never really achieved much (who’d even heard of him before Boris appeared on the scene?) and I suspect he’s one of those people who thinks it’s a compliment if somebody calls him ‘incorrigible’ which, while it seems to be used as a reluctant, semi-admiring description of somebody who is unable to change their ways, it actually means “incurably bad, or depraved” (OED) or “incapable of being corrected or amended” (Merriam-Webster).
Sociopathy and brown-nosing even enters the world of botany and zoology. The naming of newly discovered plants and animals follows an internationally accepted two-word system set up by Carl Linnaeus on the 18th century: the first word identifies the genus, the second the species, often using the discoverer’s name or that of another well-known figure. Some of these names are now being reviewed because their names related to people who have since been discredited, like a beetle named Anophthalmus hitleri in 1937. Actually, since it’s brown and eyeless and looks rather like a very small turd, that one seems OK to me, as does a moth discovered in 2017 that was christened Neopalpa donaldtrumpi because it has blond head scales and small genitalia.
Then, last week, the American Ornithological Society said it was changing the names of birds named after racists, slavers and misogynists. Perhaps Britain could follow suit and the Great Tit, currently Parus major, could become Parus Johnsoni.
* Despite ‘a low man (sic) on the totem pole’ being used colloquially to indicate low status, the importance of people pictured on a totem pole actually increases downwards. Well, you wouldn’t want to be the chief and have your image carved at the top where nobody could see it would you?
