14 June 2025
Labour’s spending review last week allocated more money to housing, nuclear power, carbon capture, new rail links and defence. Defence? For heavens’ sakes, what can we offer on the world stage by allying with or against the big world powers of America, China, India, Russia, and even the EU? The days of empire are gone. We’re not even part of the EU now. Britain is just a small island that, apart from renting property to USAF bases, is militarily irrelevant even when compared with states in the Middle East and North Korea.
Surely the money could be better spent?
Almost certainly, but not on corporate failures like Thames Water, whose horrific incompetence continues to make headlines. Its potential buyers are now asking to be let off its £123m fine for environmental and other criminal breaches of its licences and permits, including intentionally diverting millions of pounds it was granted for environmental clean-ups into bonuses and dividends.
KKR, an American private equity firm, has already pulled out of the auction, worried about its politicisation and its inadequate assets and only a bunch of bondholders who lent the company some £13bn remain. If their bid isn’t accepted, it’s probable that Thames Water will return to public ownership but a recent report has suggested this could be done without spending a penny; and people spending pennies is one of their problems (younger readers may need to ask what ‘spending a penny’ means because it now seems to cost anything between four and ten shillings).
A recent report by Common Wealth, a not-for-profit group formed in 2019 to “reimagine” the relationships between ownership and society at large, has disputed the cost £99bn reported as the total cost of renationalising of all English water companies, pointing out that this figure was produced by a thinktank funded by water companies. Common Wealth has suggested that the government could use a process called ‘special administration’ to return Thames Water to permanent public ownership and that when its debts and past dividends paid to shareholders are set against its supposed regulatory capital value, the cost would be much less, possibly even close to zero.
Israel has recently admitted to a novel approach to war: arm enemy criminals. Israel Defence Fund officials have confirmed they have been supporting a Palestinian gang, led by Yasser abu Shabab, known locally for his involvement in criminal activity, in an attempt to undermine Hamas after 50 members of this gang have been killed in recent months.
Then, to distract attention from its culpability in Gaza, Israel attacked targets in Iran to stop them making nuclear weapons. Does Benjamin Natanyahu really believe it’s better to get your defence in before an attack? Iran has now promised the attack that would ‘justify’ its response. They’re like squabbling children, except they’re potentially squabbling over the world’s future instead of which is the best YouTube clip of people falling over.
Except squabbling children don’t risk starting World War III, even if it appears Netanyahu would accept this if it would keep him out of prison for longer.
There’s more confusion in Germany where Joachim Streit, a German MEP, is campaigning to get the EU to admit Canada as a member. I wonder how he fared in “Geografie” at school.
In America, Donald Trump’s trying to start Civil War II by calling in 700 marines and 4,000 members of the national guard to control protests against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement detentions taking place in Los Angeles. The ICE raids targeted immigrant workers in the city but the California governor, Gavin Newsom, and other civic leaders called the mobilisation of troops “authoritarian” and “a brazen abuse of power”, that has “inflamed a combustible situation”.
By Monday, even more residents were taking part in protests and sympathetic protestors were starting their own demonstrations in places like New York, Austin, Chicago, Dallas and San Francisco.
In Los Angeles, national guard troops and marines are reported to have told their families and friends they were not comfortable about being used as pawns in politically-motivated domestic operations, while Trump is trying to convince people it’s all a foreign conspiracy.
What makes it all the more poignant is that the actual insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol have been pardoned and released from earned prison while those protesting peacefully in the streets against ICE raids face the US marines.
Even a Republican senator, Rand Paul has described Trump as “a delusional narcissist and an orange-faced windbag” while another dedicated Trump supporter, Marjorie Taylor Greene, has admitted she didn’t actually read Trump’s tax and spending bill before voting for it and that, if she had, she’d have voted against it.
Public records show that, during hubby’s first 100 days in office, Melania, Mrs Trump, spent just 14 days in the White House, which might appear to a cynic to imply a marriage not entirely based on mutual infatuation.
Jonathan Haidt has written a book, The Anxious Generation, which proposes four “norms”: no smartphones before the age of 14; no social media until 16; phone-free schools; and far more unsupervised play and childhood independence.
I’d add “no more crisps and pop” to the list (and would limit sugar because I’ve seen too many sugar rushes in children). My own experience last week came when shopping and I bought a Robinsons orange and mango drink as part of a ‘meal deal’ (“no added sugar, real fruit in every drop”).
Puzzled by its bitter taste I took a magnifying glass to the list of contents, printed in a white 4-point typeface reversed out of an orange background, a combination not recommended by the Royal National Institute of Blind People. There was, predictably, more water than anything else, followed by fruit juice from concentrates (apple 16%, orange 1% and mango 1%), citric acid, acidity regulator, antioxidant, carrot and apple concentrate, orange and other natural flavourings, stabiliser, sweeteners, and natural colour (carotenes). That’s the last time I buy an apple and carrot drink described as an orange and mango drink. Back to Adam’s Ale next time.
